LVT - Service charge

LVT – Service charge

3:48 PM, 16th June 2014, 12 years ago 10

My name is Rony Aga and I own a flat in east London.

A few weeks ago the leaseholders on our building got an invoice to pay an excess service charge for 2011 – 2012 with a calculation document from the management company. LVT - Service charge

Forty leaseholders decided go through the LVT process but in the meantime some of us have received a remainder to pay the invoice in 10 days or get a fine of £120 pounds. It says that if we don’t pay that the management company will let their solicitors to handle that.

I need advice on what to do.

Should I just await to the LVT  judgement or pay now the excess service charge even without any explanation for it?

Regards

Rony


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since January 2011 - Comments: 12205 - Articles: 1397

    3:50 PM, 16th June 2014, About 12 years ago

    I suggest the group finds itself a legal advisor, each chipping in say £100 would buy you all quite a lot of advice from a Direct Access Barrister. See >>> http://www.cotswoldbarristers.co.uk/
    .

  • Comments: 226

    3:56 PM, 16th June 2014, About 12 years ago

    Hi Rony,

    Non payment of service charges can produce a breach in the T and C’s of your mortgage conditions.

    My advice would be to phone the management company and speak to a senior Property Manager, explaining the situation and saying that you will pay the service charges, subject to the outcome of the LVT.

    If the LVT finds in your favour, then you would expect to receive a refund, or for the excess funds to be held on your account as a credit.

    If you don’t take action, the amount starts to add up as they add fees for debt collection etc.

    Phone the management company, get an agreement, and then put it all in writing to them so you create the necessary paper trail.

    Hope that helps?

  • Member Since August 2013 - Comments: 109

    5:19 PM, 16th June 2014, About 12 years ago

    Tread carefully, it could be considered safest to pay and then fight, withholding is a very tricky path to follow.

    I believe that if the possible costs are not notified within 18 months they are not recoverable, however the notification can be very vague and still be valid.

    I have heard the opinion that you should make the case with one LH first as this reduces the opportunity for a legal fees feeding frenzy. Too late for that…

    Can you join the existing action, 40 of them must have paid for some advice already, or at least make sure you are included in the part that asks for legal charges not to be put on the service charges (s20.c ?).

  • Member Since November 2013 - Comments: 252 - Articles: 10

    8:17 PM, 16th June 2014, About 12 years ago

    Dear Rony,

    I would be happy to look at a copy of the demand and then have a free 15 min telephone discussion with you about your options.

    There is certainly strength in numbers for any situation such as this, so it would be helpful to gather the lessees who have not gone to the LVT together.

    Please email me via my profile.

  • Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 7

    7:59 AM, 17th June 2014, About 12 years ago

    Thank you all for the interesting comments.I already sent an application to join the LVT case i am waiting for approve.Our building is from 2010 and on the two previous LVT cases we won and got a credit for that,last month we paid Service Charge for six month and we got a rise of almost 60% for an extra costs(boilers issue) and now they asked an excess Service Charge for 2011-2012 with now explanation and when we tray to contact them by the phone or by email they avoid us.

    Regards,Rony Aga

  • Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 7

    8:26 AM, 17th June 2014, About 12 years ago

    Reply to the comment left by “Mark Smith (Barrister-At-Law)” at “16/06/2014 – 20:17“:

    Thank you Mark I’ll contact you.

    Regards,Rony Aga

  • Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1632 - Articles: 3

    4:02 PM, 18th June 2014, About 12 years ago

    Reply to the comment left by “Mark Alexander” at “16/06/2014 – 15:50“:

    Rony, I have suffered the same problems with 2 landlords, and the law says you must pay first, then go to the FTT. However, you are legally entitled under s22 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to inspect all the invoices and documentation which supports the Service Charge.

    You mention boiler work accounted for a significant amount. Did the landlord send you the requisite notice and obtain quotes to have the work done?

  • Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 7

    7:55 AM, 19th June 2014, About 12 years ago

    Reply to the comment left by “Lou Valdini” at “18/06/2014 – 16:02“:

    Lou hello
    Thank you for your comment,until now we suffer a luck of communication with the management company so we don’t have the documents that support the excess service charge and That is way we join the LVT case,regards the boiler work the landlord didn’t sent me the requisite notice to obtain quotes to have the work done i was in a hurry to pay that extra service charge because of this emergency situation i lost a tenant that said that he want to renew the contract for one more year but a week before the and of the previous tenancy agreement he decided to leave because of the hitting problem but my letting agent find very quick a new tenant so i didn’t suffer from a void period.

  • Member Since August 2013 - Comments: 109

    9:39 AM, 19th June 2014, About 12 years ago

    You have rights – now what is it the youngsters say – ROTFLMAO!

    http://www.lease-advice.org/information/faqs/faq.asp?item=29

  • Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 7

    10:29 AM, 19th June 2014, About 12 years ago

    Reply to the comment left by “Chris Amis” at “19/06/2014 – 09:39“:

    Thank you Chris i appreciate that.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or