1 week ago | 7 comments
Following on from last week’s theory about the purging of small landlords from the private rented sector (PRS), here comes the first trap.
It’s obvious that many landlords don’t engage closely with the sector since best estimates put the number of private landlords in England at around 2.6 million, but a significant chunk will not have heard of the Renters’ Rights Act (RRA).
Just this week, Property118 reported that only 153,000 downloads of the RRA Information Sheet had been made with nine days left.
To underpin this, my oldest friend has several flats, and he looked at me askance last week when I raised some of the changes that are now law.
The rent money lands every month, he is known as a good landlord, but I fear that he, and many other decent landlords, are in for a huge shock.
Landlords must provide all tenants named on a written tenancy with a copy of the government-produced Information Sheet by 31 May – that’s this Sunday.
Miss that deadline and the usual fine is £4,000, rising to a maximum of £7,000 depending on aggravating factors.
But let’s face it, there’s no chance a council will miss this opportunity to open our wallets.
It gets considerably worse: if the breach continues beyond 28 days, or if a landlord commits a second offence within five years, penalties can reach £40,000.
That’s simply ludicrous, but it tells us three things: the government, both Labour and Conservative, has never really liked landlords; neither party has ever genuinely understood the private rented sector or shown any appetite to; and millions of landlords are about to receive their first RRA spanking with a fine for not telling tenants they are now, effectively, in charge.
The RRA is a missed opportunity to truly level the playing field.
As usual, things have gone off half-cocked.
If landlords can accept that there are bad apples in our ranks, and most of us can, then surely everyone can accept that there are bad tenants too?
Non-payers, late payers, tenants wrecking properties and simply walking away. But we can’t say that out loud, can we?
It is estimated that there are already more than 170 rules and regulations applying to the private rented sector: Gas Safe certificates, electrical inspections, deposit schemes, licensing, EPC requirements, and yet the political conversation treats landlords as if they operate in a regulatory (and moral) vacuum.
If you are a landlord reading this column because you have searched Google for something like ‘fine for not giving Renters’ Rights Act Information Sheet’ then welcome.
You are probably bewildered at being threatened with a fine for not handing over a piece of paper.
I have this to say to you: I am sorry. Sorry you are a landlord.
Sorry you were just getting on with your life and providing a quality home.
I’m sorry your career, your family, your actual existence distracted you from the relentless tide of legislation.
You must now appreciate that keeping your head down and just getting on with it means you are late to the party.
To bring you up to date: We have been royally turned over, and no one in Westminster cares.
The loss of Section 21, which I will wager you will have never used, the move to periodic tenancies, two months’ notice required from day one and near-impossible possession grounds grinding through overwhelmed courts: these aren’t minor tweaks.
They are a structural dismantling of the small landlord’s ability to manage tenant risk.
And the fines are absurdly disproportionate to reality.
Up to £7,000, that’s PER PROPERTY, for not posting or emailing a PDF?
If you own several properties and missed the memo, the maths gets very quickly brutal.
If you don’t know where to look for the tenant’s Information Sheet, then it’s on the .Gov website.
Obviously, no one is making the case for the decent majority of landlords.
No one in power is interested in the landlord who keeps the boiler running, accepts the occasional late payment and has never seen the inside of a courtroom.
The system is now designed around the bad actor, and the rest of us have become unimaginable collateral damage.
You are not a villain.
You are just a person who bought a property, gave someone a home, and hoped to bolster their pension in the process.
Unfortunately, in 2026, that’s akin to being the country’s current pantomime villain.
Until next time,
The Landlord Crusader
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Private rented sector key to solving London housing crisis – NRLANext Article
Potential pitfalls when inheriting rental properties
1 week ago | 7 comments
2 weeks ago | 15 comments
4 weeks ago | 11 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 3266 - Articles: 81
10:20 AM, 29th May 2026, About 7 hours ago
I keep saying it cause hopefully one day, someone in power with commode sense reads our side of the story:
April 2026 Govt now fining us £7000 each tenant for every RRA act letter we cannot prove we’ve gave to the tenant-In ten years time. We get fined £7000 for an admin error for a letter the tenant can get off the internet just like we have to. This time Govt gone too far. We Housing Providers. Many of us don’t want the houses & only keeping for the tenant. And you want to fine us £7000 for an error where no one has got hurt?
£7000 for a paperwork error each tenant & even if you have gave em the sheets, if you lose your proof, you’ve had it. I can stab someone & get less. Parking ticket £60. No car insurance £200. Letter that tenants not bothered about £7000?
I tell me Landlord mates in the gym, they can’t believe it. I say It’s really easy, go on Google put £7000 fine Landlord in. They come back next day & say Wow cannot believe it, I would never have never known, that’s it, I’m selling.
I bike Sundays with 10-15 lads. Some have houses, I tell them, they flabbergasted, they had no idea.
I’ve got several expensive (for Nottingham) nice bungalows nice areas I was maybe never gonna’ sell. I’m even selling them now if/when the tenant should ever leave. Govt gone too far now. Renters group love it, but someone please tell em, they’ve now voted for something that’s made their houses more expensive & cut supply. My tenants understand fully what the Govt & Councils are doing to them, they’ve known for years I wish to sell but they now can’t get anywhere any more. All started since George Osborne Sec 24 2015, then Selective Licensing 2018, then UC, the list goes on.
Member Since May 2017 - Comments: 791
10:27 AM, 29th May 2026, About 7 hours ago
170 rules and regulations and now the RRA – it goes a bit beyond my ‘Armchair’ investment
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3591 - Articles: 5
10:56 AM, 29th May 2026, About 6 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by JB at 29/05/2026 – 10:27
Its true that the act of receiving rent is passive. There is no action by the LL when this ‘transaction’ occurs.
BUT the act of or reason for someone paying you rent is because they have entered and agreement with you on the basis that you are providing not only accommodation, but an associated service that ensures this accommodation is up to legal standard.
The accommodation and the service are not mutually exclusive. One cannot exist without the other. A person can rent one house or 100 houses. Rent is paid regularly and the tax is also paid on this in the same manner. The income is not dependant on the rise and fall of the economy or markets.
The regular income is not generated from the gain of the asset. It is regular income which is taxed, like income form any other job which provides a wage.
To therefore say a landlord does not work for their income, or the rental income is from an investment is factually incorrect.