1 week ago | 7 comments
The private rented sector in the UK is currently facing an existential threat, not from market forces, but from a persistent, dangerous economic illiteracy taking root in local and central government.
As England’s landlords cautiously navigate the complex compliance requirements of the Renters’ Rights Act, a new breed of politician has emerged in the recent local elections.
This is someone who views property not as a business asset, but as an ideological battleground.
Take, for instance, the recent rhetoric from Hackney’s deputy mayor, Dylan Law.
In an interview with Politics JOE, he said: “I don’t see why any landlord is making profit off rent, off housing. If I pay rent to my house, it is for a human right. I’m paying just to maintain that home. I think that should be the basis. So if it has to be a thing where a two-bedroom flat literally is £600 maximum then it is what it has to be. And for all the landlords who complain about that…it’s tough luck.”
Don’t believe that someone like that can be elected to a position of power in local government? Then watch the first 18 seconds of his interview. The shrug at the end tells its own story.
The hard part for me is that lots of people hear this nonsense about rent controls and agree with him. There’s no doubting what he says.
Dylan’s suggestion that the rent for a two-bedroom flat should be capped at £600 is not just detached from reality; it is beyond economically illiterate.
He is saying this in a borough where average rents are £2,600, so suggesting a 75% reduction is not a housing policy; it is a de facto eviction notice for the entire private rented sector in that area.
When politicians propose such simple ‘solutions’, they betray a fundamental misunderstanding of how the world works.
They also ignore the most basic law of economics: when you artificially suppress prices below market value, you destroy supply.
There’s no appreciation, naturally, of a landlord who cannot cover their mortgage, pay maintenance or meet their tax liabilities because of a politically motivated price ceiling.
Landlords will not suddenly find a way to operate at a loss. They will sell.
And when they sell, those properties are often removed from the rental market entirely, usually bought by owner-occupiers and not by other landlords who face the issue of not being able to make the home pay for itself.
Having a ludicrously low rent cap means landlords will be subsidising the rent and going hungry while someone lives the high life in their prized asset.
The ideology also ignores the real-world fact that rent controls have never worked anywhere.
Property118 regularly highlights this because the result is always the same: a decline in the quality of housing stock, a black market for rentals and a severe shortage of available homes.
Despite this mountain of evidence, we are seeing this virus spread.
Scotland is currently legislating for a restrictive rent cap framework and in Wales, the debate remains volatile and was an issue raised in Senedd campaigns.
Landlords in Northern Ireland are aghast at the increasingly flirty noises being made for similar populist price-fixing measure, even after its government implemented a one-increase-per-year rule.
For the professional landlord, the Renters’ Rights Act was already a significant hurdle and then we have the EPC debacle on the horizon.
Its expensive mandate to force all rented homes to reach an EPC C rating by 2030 really threatens the viability of older housing stock.
When you layer the cost of mandatory energy upgrades on top of restricted rental yields and the threat of arbitrary local rent caps, the result is a perfect storm that will force thousands of small-scale landlords to exit the market.
Why do voters support this?
Because it is easier to sell the dream of ‘affordable rent’ from exploitative landlords than it is to address the difficult reality of supply.
It is a seductive, populist narrative that paints landlords as villains to avoid the uncomfortable truth that our housing crisis is a decades-long failure of planning, construction and fiscal policy.
We must move past the Green Party style of ideological posturing.
If these politicians truly cared about renters, they would focus on incentivising new builds and reducing the tax burden that makes high rents necessary.
Instead, they pursue policies that punish investment and destabilise the very sector that provides housing for millions.
Landlords are not the problem; we are the essential providers of a service that the state has consistently failed to supply.
If we allow ideology to override basic economics, we aren’t just driving landlords out of the market, the same zealots will be systematically evicting the tenants who rely on us to survive.
It is time we made the economic case for our survival, loudly and clearly before the ignorant among us really do bring an end to the private rented sector as we know it.
Then they will have something to shrug about.
Until next time,
The Landlord Crusader
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
1 week ago | 7 comments
4 weeks ago | 20 comments
2 months ago | 7 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 127
10:21 AM, 15th May 2026, About 41 minutes ago
Very well said. I cannot understand the black hole of ignorance that doesn’t link the rise in rents from 2022 with the BOE rates rising from 0.25% to 3.5% in the same year. A 3% rise on a mortgage rate costs the homeowners around £7.5k/year extra on a £250k loan. Primary residence homeowners have had to suck this up but some renters feel they should be exempt somehow, probably because they haven’t bothered to find out why. Much easier to blame personal greed rather than an economic problem that started in 2008.
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 806
10:26 AM, 15th May 2026, About 36 minutes ago
By coincidence I saw a video from New York, exactly the same issue is happening there with the same flawed logic pushing the rent control argument.
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 3256 - Articles: 81
10:40 AM, 15th May 2026, About 22 minutes ago
It’s not our job to provide that basic human right. He could buy all mine off me & provide that basic human right for the prices he wishes if he likes, not sure he’d be covering the mortgage money though, so who would be paying the mortgage?
I can earn 7k pa more with money invested elsewhere, than in a house without being threatened of going to prison if tenant takes battery out smoke alarm or 7000 pounds fine if I don’t give tenant an information sheet, so yes tell u what, let’s take money out bank and house these people at a loss.
Member Since May 2017 - Comments: 776
10:56 AM, 15th May 2026, About 6 minutes ago
Food is my human right. I’d like a big full trolley load for £20