Nottingham's landlord licensing creates £114.9m in 'social value'?

Nottingham’s landlord licensing creates £114.9m in ‘social value’?

Nottingham housing licensing graphic showing terraced homes, inspection paperwork and figures of £114.9m social value and £4.62 returned per £1 invested.
8:01 AM, 29th May 2026, 9 hours ago 5

Nottingham’s landlord licensing schemes have created £114.9m in social value over five years, according to the first evaluation published by the city council of their wider impact.

The calculation reveals that £4.62 was returned for every £1 invested between 2020 and 2024.

The independent study examined £24.9m invested in the city’s licensing schemes, assessing their effect on renters, landlords, neighbourhoods and public services including the NHS, police and fire services.

Of the total social value identified, £91m was linked to improvements in renters’ health, safety and wellbeing.

Who was consulted?

However, well-known Nottingham landlord Mick Roberts told Property118: “This report bears little resemblance to my experience of licensing in Nottingham.

“The council describes £24.9m as an ‘investment’, but landlords have funded this scheme through licence fees, costs which inevitably affect what can be spent on properties and, ultimately, rents.

“When the scheme began, it appeared to support a substantial licensing operation, reportedly involving around 78 staff in 2018.”

He added: “I have been one of Nottingham’s largest providers of homes for homeless tenants receiving benefits over the past 29 years.

“Yet neither I nor, to my knowledge, my tenants have ever been asked whether licensing has delivered value for us.

“Before the council celebrates these findings, it should explain who was consulted and how the claimed benefits were measured.”

How many have benefitted?

Mr Roberts continued: “I accept that licensing may have improved some poor-quality homes and helped bring some properties up to standard.

“However, that is not the whole story. In my case, money that would have gone towards new kitchens and bathrooms has instead gone on licensing costs.

“My tenants understand that, because they are the ones living in homes where planned improvements have been delayed.”

He continued: “That is why I strongly challenge the claim that 14,500 tenants have benefited.

“Some undoubtedly will have done, but the council should also account for tenants whose landlords have had less money available for improvements, and for the wider costs created by its housing policies.”

Social Return on Investment

Councillor Jay Hayes, Nottingham City Council’s executive member for housing and planning, said: “It is the first time in England that the social impact of private rented housing licensing has been measured using a Social Return on Investment approach.

“In doing so, it moves the debate beyond whether licensing works, to what difference it truly makes.

“The findings are striking. Over five years, housing licensing in Nottingham generated nearly £115 million in social value, improving lives, strengthening neighbourhoods, and reducing pressure on vital public services.”

He added: “Every £1 invested delivered £4.62 in value back to the city.

“These figures represent warmer homes, safer buildings, fewer hazards, and greater peace of mind for thousands of residents.”

More compliant landlords

The findings also show that more than 14,500 renters benefited directly from improvements made to their homes.

More than 7,400 unlicensed landlords were brought into compliance during the period covered by the assessment.

And 36% of landlords reported improved knowledge of their responsibilities.

The council’s report also recorded a 48% reduction in anti-social behaviour and a 45% fall in waste complaints in licensed areas.

Further value was attributed to avoided fires, NHS savings and carbon reduction benefits arising from improvements to homes and enforcement work.

Good landlords are supported

Councillor Hayes said: “This report tells a powerful story about what housing licensing actually delivers on the ground.

“It shows that good landlords are supported, renters are better protected, and neighbourhoods are stronger and safer as a result.

“What makes this report unique is that it moves the conversation beyond cost, and instead focuses on value – value for residents, for responsible landlords, for partners, and for the city as a whole.”

He added: “Nottingham is proud to be leading the way with a report that is already informing national discussions.

“Ultimately, this evaluation shows that housing licensing is not just a regulatory tool, but a long-term investment in people, communities, and the future of our city.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since May 2025 - Comments: 77

    8:50 AM, 29th May 2026, About 8 hours ago

    I assume this means selective licensing although it is not explicitly mentioned. I fail to see how this creates value. In Great Yarmouth where has been reintroduced again I have simply increased by tenants rent by 3.8%. Of this increase 60% is basically these new “taxes”. I have made it very clear to my tenants where the increase has come from and asked them to email the counciller asking him to explain and justify. With regards to anti social behaviour – the council pretty much does nothing. A neighbouring social housing property was fly tipping waste on my property. Council did nothing so I installed CCTV and recorded the incidents. Again they did nothing saying it was private property. In the end I installed security gates to stop the councils rogue tenants gaining access. I’ve had enough and am waiting for the tenants to move out so I can sell.

  • Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 3266 - Articles: 81

    10:21 AM, 29th May 2026, About 7 hours ago

    My full take on it:

    They not right in the head are they.
    The money is not invested, it is wasted by tenants having rent increases to pay for the scheme to pay for something like 78 staff in 2018.

    Landlords spent £ millions on having thumbturns fitted before we got that overturned cause many tenants didn’t want it. Nor did some Licensing staff.

    Makes u laugh, I’m Nottingham’s biggest provider over 29 years to homeless Benefit tenants and the council in this evaluation survey has not once asked me nor my tenants if we’ve had any value. So who they asking?

    Granted, they will have some bad houses better, some EPC’s improved, but my houses have 100% got worse. As Licensing has had the money that I was gonna spend on new kitchens and new bathrooms. My tenants know this.

    This is utter lies, 14,500 tenants haven’t benefitted. Some will have, but lots more are worse off. And where are the figures the council are now spending extra on temporary accommodation?
    And the £3200pm there were spending on putting families with children into one room in hotels cause they now decided 3 bed houses, third bedroom couldn’t be classified as 3rd bedroom now 2cm smaller than Legal room sizes definited by the Govt but now enforced by Council?

    So they acknowledging 64% of Landlords already knew their responsibilities and had to pay for something they already knew and were complying with?

    So if the ASB has improved, why did Licensing have to renew the scheme after 5 years?
    ASB has improved has it? Aah right, so why did someone get stabbed at back of one of my Licensed houses in March? Licensing didn’t stop that. And the perpetrator was a Council tenant without Licensing.

    I’ve had zero support. Trying to sell all my houses with tenants in and Licensing has done nothing but try to make me evict and sell empty demanding £900 Licensing fee instead of listening to common sense, that it would be upmost foolish to pay £900 for a licence for 3 weeks only for the new Landlord to pay £900 again on the SAME house.

    Councillor Hayes who knows nothing of housing the homeless by the way, is masking the destructional cost of Licensing and with the word value. Oh it was good value that cause we all had a good time.

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3591 - Articles: 5

    10:33 AM, 29th May 2026, About 7 hours ago

    Reply to the comment left by Mick Roberts at 29/05/2026 – 10:21
    How are you getting on with the SL issue? I know they were trying to make you pay even though some T;s are being evicted and some of your houses up for sale. Managed to get them to give you a further exemption while these are going through??

  • Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 3266 - Articles: 81

    11:03 AM, 29th May 2026, About 6 hours ago

    SL generally leave me alone. It’s when new young staff member comes in that doesn’t know me and has no common sense that it starts all over again.

    They didn’t seem to budge on the exemption, from the initial gal several months earlier trying to help me. Tenant left in the end, but to want me to pay £900 for Licence for 3 days and the new Landlord pay another £900 utter bonkers.

  • Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 42

    11:41 AM, 29th May 2026, About 5 hours ago

    I bought the property next door to my own. I called the council for advice on the SL. Lady told me that the licence for the previous LL was still on her desk to finalise. Even though it had been inspected a few months before, I had to start from scratch and supply every certificate she already had in front of her. No discount, no refund for previous LL. Inspected again.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles