7 months ago | 3 comments
The number of Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) stock drops by more than half (60%) in some parts of England as landlords leave due to HMO stigma, according to new data.
Research by HMO management platform COHO reveals in England, the number of available house shares has fallen by -15.2% between June and September 2025.
COHO claims an HMO landlord exodus is underway as many leave due to the increased “HMO stigma being peddled by certain corners of Westminster” and before the Renters’ Rights Bill becomes law.
According to COHO’s research, demand has fallen in 11 of the 12 major English cities that COHO analysed, with Bradford (-59.1%) and Leeds (-55.4%) seeing more than half of the available stock leave the market.
Meanwhile, stock has diminished by more than 20% in Manchester (-33.3%), Brighton (-32.9%), Leicester (-24.6%), Nottingham (-23.7%), and Sheffield (-21%).
London is the only city to have seen an increase in house share stock, with numbers rising by 4.7% between June and September.
Meanwhile, house share demand data shows that over the same time period tenant appetite for house shares has increased by just 3.3% in England, growth that is not strong enough to explain such a drastic decline in availability.
In Bradford, where availability has dropped by almost -60%, demand is up by just 14.3%, while in Leeds, home to the second most severe stock drop, demand has actually fallen by -1.1%.
COHO believes the drop in supply could be down to the fact that between June and September, many students will have secured last-minute accommodation.
However, the management platform also believes HMO landlords have started exiting the sector, claiming they’re “being driven out by the increased HMO stigma being peddled by certain corners of Westminster and the press in relation to England’s migrant housing crisis.”
COHO Founder and CEO, Vann Vogstad, said: “Any data that points towards a declining supply of shared houses should be a real cause for concern on Downing Street. The HMO sector is a vital tool in the nation’s battle against the housing drought, but the sector is facing hard battles from two fronts.
“First there’s the fact that the entire sector is being unfairly maligned on the Right of the political spectrum, placed at the centre of some kind of batty migrant conspiracy theory. We already know that this is causing planning councils to shy away from approving new shared living schemes, but is it now also causing HMO landlords to cut their losses and sell up.”
Mr Vogstad adds the Renters’ Rights Bill is another factor causing HMO landlords to leave the sector.
He said: “The incoming Renters’ Rights Bill looks like it is going to be given the green light, full steam ahead, without proper consideration given to the ways in which it disincentivises landlords, again causing many to leave the rental sector. Then we’ve got Labour’s rumoured proposal of taxing rental income.
“This in particular, is going to be a huge blow to HMO landlords whose rental income per property tends to be greater than your standard buy-to-let. We can’t be surprised now if swathes of HMO landlords decide that enough is enough and leave the sector altogether.
“If this is indeed happening, there’s no prize for guessing what comes next. Further rental supply shortages which in turn means a massive hike in rent prices. Everybody loses.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Landlords lose confidence in the EPC system as many plan to sellNext Article
Lenders reduce rates and launch new buy to let deals
7 months ago | 3 comments
7 months ago | 2 comments
7 months ago | 6 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 204
12:57 AM, 23rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
I don’t own any HMO’s and do not wish to buy one but in my younger days I have lived in them and without them, I would not have been able to travel for temporary work.
The government say that they want to create jobs, but without HMO’s skilled workers that are not available locally will not be able to fill the positions.
Both this and the last government are so hell bent on getting rid of landlords that they can not see that they are preventing skilled people traveling for work in different areas.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 1996 - Articles: 21
1:37 PM, 23rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
I have owned HMOs for 12 years and know a lot of landlords who own HMOS. We provide accomodation to young (and some not so young) working people. Our local Council are happy with the standard of our houses.
Unfortunately, there are bad HMO slumlords out there who give the sector a bad name. The Councils are, rightly concerned about them but many, wrongly, tar all landlords with the same brush. A lot of selective licensing conditions in effect prohibit HMOs because they require that the property is occupied by a single household.
One of the problems we will face is dealing with anti-social behaviour (and in an HMO behaviour that is much less than ASB can upset other tenants and cause them to leave). The abolition of section 21 means taking the tenant to court. It is crazy to expect complainants to live under the same roof and share the same kitchen and living space as the anti-social tenant for many months until the case gets to court. There is no guarantee that the bad tenant will have to go. Good tenants may give notice and leave.
The Bill will provide that where the person against whom the order is sought is a tenant occupying an HMO, in considering effects of the anti-social behaviour, the court must have particular regard to the effect on other occupiers who share with that person accommodation or facilities within the HMO.
All well and good though one would hope the courts already took that into consideration. The problem is the delay in getting to court and of getting victims to give evidence.
Member Since June 2021 - Comments: 51
3:41 PM, 23rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
For the past few years, there have been lots of hmo’s for sale in my town. I have kept mine for now, but the other year, when I was increasing my portfolio, I went for traditional BTL’s because the time difference in managing HMO’s is so much more than a family house, it’s not always worth the extra money.
Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 106
5:42 PM, 23rd September 2025, About 7 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 23/09/2025 – 13:37
Totally agree with you that this has not been well thought out at all, and will lead to seious problems.
I have been running HMOs for nearly 20 years, at the upper end of the market with young professionals, mainly engineers, lawyers, and the like. I have had hundreds of tenants, all carefully selected.
And yet I have had to use S21 three times, in each case it was a male tenant who was harrassing a female tenant. Nothing that would have stood up in court, but without the S21 tool to be proactive, it is very possible that more serious things would have happened.
It’s clear that this bill is largely about posturing, and not written by people who understand or care about the complexities of the rental market.