London councils' landlord Capital Letters faces closure amid market challenges

London councils’ landlord Capital Letters faces closure amid market challenges

London councils' landlord Capital Letters faces closure amid market challenges
9:25 AM, 8th April 2025, 1 year ago 4

Capital Letters, an organisation established by several London councils to tackle the growing homelessness issue and cut costs on temporary housing, stands on the verge of closure, according to Inside Housing.

Launched in 2019, Capital Letters describes itself as a ‘not-for-profit landlord and service provider’.

It was connecting private landlords with 21 member boroughs to provide homes for homeless families at Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rates.

However, the firm now intends to cease operations once its current agreements conclude, with most staff facing redundancy by the end of May.

Inside Housing says that insiders report that the firm’s final leasing pact with Merton Council will finish before the wind-down.

Crunch decision on future

A Capital Letters spokesperson told Inside Housing: “The members are considering the options available to continue the great work of Capital Letters. No decisions have been made.”

A crucial meeting is scheduled for today (8 April), where the company’s board and representatives from London boroughs will decide whether to remove Capital Letters from the Companies House register or keep it as an inactive entity.

Since its inception, the organisation has seen four finance directors and altered its operational model.

Initially backed by government funds, it aimed to alleviate pressure on local authorities by matching tenants from housing lists with private rentals to help relieve councils of their obligations.

Despite securing significant agreements, such as a £1.5bn plan in 2021 to lease 4,000 mostly new properties, and a recent £750m deal with charity Home Safe Housing to renovate 2,500 homes for mixed rental rates, Capital Letters has struggled.

One issue has been escalating rents in London which have deterred landlords from participating at LHA rates, preferring higher private rents instead.

Became a private landlord

The shift to a private sector landlord model in 2023, coupled with a £50,000 annual membership fee, led 11 partner boroughs to withdraw.

This transition yielded only 12 property acquisitions and plans to become a housing association were abandoned due to unmet regulatory standards.

Two years ago, a leaked 2023-28 strategy to The Municipal Journal hinted at potential dissolution if the private landlord approach failed to generate enough revenue by 2024-25.

Last November, the journal highlighted a drastic 90% drop in property offers to boroughs since 2022, attributing it to the widening disparity between LHA and skyrocketing private rents in the capital.

Data up to March 2024 showed offers plummeting from 2,615 in 2022 to just 257, underscoring the acute challenge faced by the agency in a tightening market.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 85

    10:42 AM, 8th April 2025, About 1 year ago

    And it’s geniuses like this, that cannot even run a not- for- profit company that like to give us advice about being a landlord.
    I see that the not for profit company were trying to charge £50k for membership. Really!
    Many people think that there is some miracle about not-for -profit that will somehow make the companies cheap to run. But economics does not work that way. I can have a not-for-profit company by paying myself a huge salary. You always need more coming in than goes out folks, whatever you want to call it.

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 754

    12:03 PM, 8th April 2025, About 1 year ago

    “Since its inception, the organisation has seen four finance directors and altered its operational model.” I wonder why? Because it doesn’t work. The challenges are too great.

    Some learnings here for the current Government. Will they take heed and stop piling on the regulations etc for LLs, sending them out of the market and exacerbating an already perilous situation?

  • Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1581

    12:49 PM, 8th April 2025, About 1 year ago

    Y local Housing Association is not for profit. Three of the directors earn £500,000 between them.

    Many of their housing stock was gifted to them by the Council.

    Their rents are comparable to mine and the houses are not as well maintained. However, I pay more in tax that I earn myself,

  • Member Since January 2016 - Comments: 473

    2:22 PM, 8th April 2025, About 1 year ago

    The 1.5 billion and 750 million mentioned in the article- did Capital Letters receive that money? Where did the £500,000 money for directors’ salaries come from? How many people did they organise dwellings for?

    I don’t dare say what I think here lest I become another victim of two tier justice…

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles