1 year ago | 3 comments
Unlock the latest insights into the property investment world with our video on the landmark court ruling clarifying rent-to-rent liabilities. This will reshape how rent-to-rent operators approach their responsibilities and how property investors navigate the property market.
Are you part of the rent-to-rent strategy? Discover what this ruling means for you and how it impacts investment strategies in the housing market. Our expert, Andrew Roberts, breaks down the complexities of property legislation and offers actionable investment tips to ensure you stay informed and ahead in the game.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
1 year ago | 3 comments
1 year ago | 5 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since January 2016 - Comments: 67
1:32 PM, 12th November 2024, About 1 year ago
It is pretty obvious, who is liable should a rent-to-rent arrangement fail.
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 778
5:14 PM, 14th November 2024, About 1 year ago
Unfortunately I can’t see the ruling really helps, the authorities can go after the rent-to-renter but you will still get the problem back again. The tenants don’t go away so you then have an unlicensed property with tenants you had no hand in selecting with a contract you didn’t write.
So yes good news in part but I can’t see you can force them to be fully compliant, it is a hollow threat to claim the property back.
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1168
5:24 PM, 14th November 2024, About 1 year ago
I’m not sure what landmark ruling he’s talking about, but if it was Rakusen v Jepson, its old news and about to be overturned by the Renters Rights Bill