0:00 AM, 26th November 2025, About 2 weeks ago 1
Text Size
Categories:
The tenancy started smoothly, with no mention of pets. But months later, the landlord discovered two large dogs living in the property. The tenancy agreement made no reference to pets at all — neither granting permission nor prohibiting them. When complaints arose about noise and damage, the landlord found they had no contractual grounds to insist the animals be removed. Repair costs mounted, neighbours were unhappy, and the landlord’s options were limited.
Tenancy agreements should include clear terms about pets. Since 2021, the government’s model tenancy agreement has been updated to make landlords consider pet requests reasonably, but that does not mean landlords must accept them. Without a clause, disputes become harder to manage. In this case, the lack of wording meant the tenant could argue they had not breached any terms. What could have been a straightforward contractual issue became a drawn-out dispute.
The lesson is simple: clarity upfront saves problems later. Landlords should decide their policy on pets, write it clearly into tenancy agreements, and, if granting permission, ensure any conditions (such as pet deposits or cleaning obligations) are recorded in writing. A missing clause leaves landlords vulnerable to both damage and neighbour disputes.
Do you allow pets in your rentals? How do you balance tenant demand for pet-friendly homes with the risk of damage?
Source: Gov.uk model tenancy agreement
Landlord Lessons: The AST date mistake
Landlord Lessons: The missing inventory
Landlord Lessons: The verbal agreement trap
Landlord Lessons: The gas safety lapse
Landlord Lessons: The unprotected deposit
Landlord Lessons: The unlicensed HMO
Landlord Lessons: The electrical safety lapse
Landlord Lessons: The Right to Rent slip
Landlord Lessons: The ignored repair
Landlord Lessons: The insurance blindspot
Landlord Lessons: The rent-to-rent risk
Landlord Lessons: The Section 21 error
Landlord Lessons: The Section 8 misstep
Landlord Lessons: The selective licensing oversight
Landlord Lessons: The EPC blindspot
Landlord Lessons: The rent increase mistake
Landlord Lessons: The service charge shock
Landlord Lessons: The tax record slip
Landlord Lessons: The guarantor gap
Landlord Lessons: The referencing shortcut
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Freda Blogs
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 737
15:27 PM, 26th November 2025, About 2 weeks ago
AST clauses are immaterial when it comes to tenant compliance. Government and judiciary consistently ignore them. Contract terms are only for LLs to comply with. .