1 year ago | 3 comments
Scotland’s housing emergency will worsen in 2025 without rent controls, the Green Party says.
Along with ‘robust’ rent controls, the Greens also demanded last month that tenants should be protected ‘permanently’ from eviction in the winter months.
Also, rent controls would protect tenants from ‘skyrocketing rents’.
The party says that homes are ‘not for profiteering’ and more effort must be made to bring empty homes back into use.
Green MSP Maggie Chapman said: “If real rent control measures are not put in place, I am worried that we will see the housing emergency getting even worse, with tenants forced out of their homes.
“There must be justice for renters who face insecure tenancies due to soaring costs and are being forced to shoulder the financial burden so their landlords can profit.”
She adds: “The government’s current proposals for this bill would enshrine perpetual rent increases into law and undermine local authorities’ ability to protect tenants by preventing them from bringing rents down.”
Ms Chapman says that rent controls are fundamental to ‘building a fairer and better housing system’ for Scots – and controls must be enforced this year.
The Greens point to ‘eye-watering rent’ rises and an average rent for a one-bedroom property reaching £710 per month.
A two-bedroom home costs around £893 per month and the Scottish Government must ‘bring forward as robust a Housing Bill as possible this year’.
Ms Chapman said: “Homes should be for living in, not for profiteering. They are not luxurious, nice to have extras in life.
“They are necessary, vital spaces. Everyone has the right to have access to a warm, safe, secure, affordable place to call home whether they own or rent the property.”
She added: “When this Housing Bill was introduced it promised protection for tenants, redefining housing as a human right.
“It gave hope to many struggling while relying on the private rented sector for a place to call home here in Scotland.
“This must be the year that we begin to repair our broken housing system.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
1 year ago | 3 comments
1 year ago | 19 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since October 2023 - Comments: 201
3:32 PM, 8th January 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 08/01/2025 – 14:08
Another supermarket analogy, is if I went into Tesco and smashed the place up, I would get arrested pretty sharpish.
BUT, if I was a tenant who smashed up a rental property, the police, council, government and judiciary would all look the other way, as it a “civil matter”
Member Since July 2017 - Comments: 51
9:11 AM, 11th January 2025, About 1 year ago
there are rent controls , it is called LHA levels which are well behind the market level for many private sector housing. They have hardly gone up in a decade. They could put this level up to a reasonable level . Like all goods in life, prices go up, otherwise not only would the tenants be homeless so would a lot of employees in other areas. The housing shortage is the govt responsibility, why are they not buying these empty properties , likewise why is Shelter not doing it.? They want the credit for cheap housing without the rules, regulations , cost and accountability , plus the problems with bad tenants.