RLA writes to Ministry of Housing over electrical safety loophole

RLA writes to Ministry of Housing over electrical safety loophole

13:27 PM, 24th February 2020, About 4 years ago 31

Text Size

New regulations raise the prospect of the highest risk rental properties not being covered by a legally binding electrical safety regime for a prolonged period of time.

The changes, due to come into force from June this year, will immediately remove the obligation for landlords to carry out electrical safety checks in Houses of Multiple Occupation (HMOs). The obligation under the new rules will not apply until a tenancy is renewed or April 2021, whichever comes first.

This will leave some rental properties under no legally binding electrical safety regime for the interim period, leaving tenants without the assurance that properties are safe.

The new plans, which have been presented to Parliament for agreement, also contain weaker penalties for landlords failing to keep the properties they rent safe and complicate the process by which local authorities can issue penalties, making enforcement more difficult.

The Residential Landlords Associations has written to the Ministry of Housing to express its concerns about the loophole being created for irresponsible landlords who otherwise would not carry out these checks. It is calling on the Government to delay the implementation of the new framework to provide time to address the problems being caused.

David Smith, Policy Director for the Residential Landlords Association, said:

“Good landlords don’t need to be told to carry out safety checks, but these changes to regulations leave tenants vulnerable to those landlords who are not so responsible. It is essential for the safety of tenants that the loophole being created is closed and we urge the Government to delay implementation until that happens.”


Share This Article


Comments

Rob Crawford

19:04 PM, 22nd May 2020, About 4 years ago

I don't agree that there is a loop hole. Licensed HMO's currently have to comply with the LA's licensing conditions and these already include a 5 yearly ECIR requirement. The new legislation will not invalidate the LA's licensing requirement. Or am I missing something here?

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now