9:16 AM, 5th September 2011, About 15 years ago 2
Text Size
Categories:

"Development company fined £14,000 for unsafe student accommodation"
Builders who took safety shortcuts in a purpose-built private student hall of residence were ordered to pay more than £14,000 in fines and costs in court.
Cost Design Ltd and UK Real Estate Ltd – part of developers MCR Group – admitted breaching building regulations before Manchester Magistrates Court concerning the development in Grafton Street, Ardwick, Manchester.
The court was told that the 55-flat development failed to meet basic fire safety standards.
Magistrates were told the building was a ‘death trap’ as builders had not installed self-closing fire safety doors or fire barriers to stop a blaze spreading. Windows that should have opened for ventilation were obstructed by scaffolding and a fire escape opened on to a building site.
Firefighters said they would have had difficulty entering the building if a fire broke out.
Cost Design was fined £4,500 with £2,605 in costs and UK Real Estate was fined £4,750 with £2,624 in costs.
The building was inspected after students moving in complained the block was little more than a building site. The council ruled the block unsafe and students were moved elsewhere until safety work was completed.
Councillor Nigel Murphy, of Manchester City Council, said: “Allowing this building to be occupied when it was so flagrantly unfit for occupation is inexcusable. The two MCR Group companies let their own self-interest take priority over the safety of students and the council had to step in to make sure vital safety work was completed before the students could move back in.”
MCR Group’s CEO is Aneel Mussarat, who has had a place in the Sunday Times Rich List.
The council has also warned other developers not to cut corners.
“The lives of students were put at risk by those involved with this development,” said Councillor Paul Andrews. “The court has rightly hit them in the pocket. This should serve as a warning to all developers that they need to ensure properties are fully compliant with regulations before tenants move in.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Marketing UK Property Events & Increasing Attendee NumbersNext Article
Buy to Let Insurance Basics
Rob
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since April 2014 - Comments: 985 - Articles: 2
13:21 PM, 5th February 2019, About 7 years ago
So how did this slip through the Council’s final building regs inspection? Surely this would have been required prior to students taking up residence in any of the rooms? There are a series of inspections, I can’t believe the Council did not see what was happening!
Ian Narbeth
Read Full Bio
You're Missing Out!
Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 1965 - Articles: 21
17:51 PM, 6th February 2019, About 7 years ago
The fines for each company work out at about £100 per flat. Given that a landlord who forgets to serve a Prescribed Information notice on time can be “fined” three times the amount of the deposit, this seems very lenient.