Renters’ Rights Bill will create a nightmare for student landlords

Renters’ Rights Bill will create a nightmare for student landlords

Packed boxes and essentials in a student dorm room ready for college move-in
12:01 AM, 22nd September 2025, 7 months ago 7

Student landlords fear the consequences of the Renters’ Rights Bill and plan to leave, according to new data.

Using landlord testimony and survey data, the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) reveals ongoing uncertainty for student landlords will drive up rents and reduce supply.

The NRLA points to data from Scotland, where fixed-term tenancies were abolished and replaced with rolling open-ended tenancies, which has resulted in the loss of around 40,000 private rented homes.

Open-ended tenancies don’t allow us to plan

According to the NRLA, the removal of fixed-term tenancies was the top concern of student landlords in relation to the Renters’ Rights Bill.

One landlord told the NRLA the removal of fixed-term tenancies will be a nightmare as they rely on predictable summer voids to complete maintenance and prepare for the next academic year.

The landlord said: “Open-ended tenancies don’t allow us to plan. It creates uncertainty for contractors, landlords, students. It’s going to be a nightmare for all of us.”

The NRLA also warns small student lets are especially vulnerable under the bill.

Ground 4A in the Renters’ Rights Bill, which is meant to let student landlords regain possession at the end of the academic year, only applies to HMOs with three or more tenants.

Despite members in the Lords trying to amend this, the Commons rejected an amendment, leaving landlords of one- and two-bedroom properties unable to guarantee possession over the summer.

A landlord told the NRLA they were frightened by the new rules and said: “I’m too frightened to advertise the property for the next academic year until the current students move out. I could be in the position of having two sets of tenants.”

Landlords considering selling due to EPC C targets

Data also reveals nearly three-quarters of landlords (74%) with properties below EPC C said they are considering selling one or more properties due to strict energy-efficiency targets.

All private rented properties will need to meet EPC C targets by 2030 and by 2028 for new tenancies.

Landlords told the NRLA many students will not allow EPC upgrades during term time, which only leaves a small summer window in order to carry out upgrades.

Other landlords also raised concerns over a lack of tradesmen to carry out the upgrades.

The NRLA warns that without adjustments to the bill, the student rental market in England could become like Scotland, where the number of PRS households shrank from 360,000 in 2016–17 to 320,000 in 2022, and around a quarter of students in Scotland rent in the PRS.

The NRLA writes on its website: “Without adjustments to timelines, tenancy rules, and funding mechanisms, the UK risks a contraction in student housing availability -as has already happened in Scotland. Smaller landlords play a key role in affordable shared housing.

“Three-quarters of student landlords with sub-EPC C properties are considering selling. If student landlords retreat, the unintended outcome could be fewer homes, higher rents, and greater reliance on expensive PBSA.”

NRLA landlord members are calling for the extension of Ground 4a to one- and two-bedroom properties and for more clarity and consistency in EPC standards.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 1013

    10:31 AM, 22nd September 2025, About 7 months ago

    The Government (aka the “Establishment”) are beholden to big business who own/run the PBSAs. Guess why PBSAs have an exemption from the changes in the RRB that affect the student lettings market. (it was no different under the last Tory Government who instigated this legislation in the first place).

  • Member Since September 2024 - Comments: 95

    10:43 AM, 22nd September 2025, About 7 months ago

    The golden age of profits from students is over. Universities have ploughed much of their excessive profits into their own student accommodation, the price of which is unregulated. With the numbers of overseas students falling, they will be seeking to close down the private sector competition. The days when family homes are taken out of the housing market in search of profit are over, rightly in my opinion.
    If you can’t switch to an HMO for non-students, you should sell now. There is no way a Labour government will do anything other than stick up for lefty students and lefty universities.

  • Member Since June 2015 - Comments: 333

    11:06 AM, 22nd September 2025, About 7 months ago

    The biggest worry I have with student tenancies is that if it is a joint tenancy just one of them needs to give 2 months notice and the tenancy ends. How is that going to work in reality?

    Right now the whole household knows they have a home for a fixed period (until the end of the academic year). If they fall out with eachother and one of them decides to move out they are still liable for the rent until the end of the tenancy or whenever they can find a replacement for themselves. The rest of the household still have a home.
    Moving forward if they have a tiff and one person decides to give 2 months notice it puts the other tenants and the landlord in a very difficult position. In reality would they all have to move out? How stressful and expensive would it be trying to downsize part way through the academic year? How difficult would it be to find a suitable random student to fill the gap? How many people are willing to sign a joint tenancy with a load of people they don’t know? That’s assuming the landlord allows the changed line up and doesn’t just accept the notice. What happens if the rest of the household decide not to move out at the appointed time? Or can’t afford to cover the extra rent if they stay? Students are supposed to be studying not worrying about homelessness, bailiffs or CCJs.

    The ability to regain the property at the end of the academic year is important but it’s also important to retain a viable tenancy throughout the academic year.

  • Member Since April 2021 - Comments: 95

    11:54 AM, 22nd September 2025, About 7 months ago

    Shouldn’t this have been raised months ago when the bill was being “consulted” and the NRLA was busy acquiescing on landlords’ behalf?

  • Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 1190

    12:23 PM, 22nd September 2025, About 7 months ago

    “All private rented properties will need to meet EPC C targets by 2030 and by 2028 for new tenancies.” Wrong……nothing has been put into law yet !!!

  • Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 781

    12:48 PM, 22nd September 2025, About 7 months ago

    This may become much worse if council tax gets replaced by property tax in November.

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 463

    9:28 PM, 23rd September 2025, About 7 months ago

    I’m sorry to run against the tide of wailing here, but aren’t student HMO landlords just being asked to share the same world as regular HMO landlords?

    There’s no particular reason why students should be able to rent as a group and have guaranteed accommodation in February, say, for a shared September start, or why their landlords should get the summer free for maintenance every year. Regular HMO tenants and their landlords don’t get such convenient arrangements. Surely students and their landlords are just going to have to work out different arrangements, if they really want their cosy world to continue?

    So, maybe students will say, when forming a group/partnership to rent a house, that if someone doesn’t move out in July like everyone else, or moves out early, then they are financially liable to pay penalties to their housemates and the landlord, and this will be written into a signed contract between them. Maybe an enterprising insurer will offer students a suitable insurance policy against such upheavals? Or maybe student landlords need to get together and insure themselves via a cheaper group policy?

    Either way, this is not an unsolvable situation and I don’t see why student HMOs should have some special status in law, different from regular HMOs. And if landlords choose to leave the sector, so be it. It’s no different from all the other landlords selling up!

    It’s also about time students had to pay council tax. Almost every other CT discount has been eliminated, including that for landlords and developers when renovating empty property,. Part-time students have to pay, this hated tax too. So why should full-time students in their hundreds of thousands still be feather-bedded?

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles