Renters’ Rights Bill amendments will safeguard possession rights

Renters’ Rights Bill amendments will safeguard possession rights

0:01 AM, 8th April 2025, About a month ago 2

Text Size

A new amendment to the Renters’ Rights Bill clarifies that landlords can still reclaim their properties by serving notice prior to the Bill’s enactment, even if they pursue a court order post-implementation.

The amendment is being championed by Baroness Taylor, the housing minister in the Lords, and the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) says this is a crucial change.

Under the original proposal, a three-month transition phase was set to permit landlords to use existing Section 21 and Section 8 notices.

However, outside of that window, if the landlord hasn’t begun proceedings the notice will become invalid, and the landlord will have to start again using one of the new Section 8 grounds.

Impossible to take action

The NRLA’s head of policy, James Wood, explains: “This would not only mean the action would be out of the landlord’s hands, but busy courts would find it almost impossible to make that happen in the time allowed.”

He says this highlights the potential for cases to be dismissed due to administrative delays beyond a landlord’s control.

The NRLA’s dialogue with government officials has led to the amendment, he says.

Mr Wood goes on: “We are pleased Baroness Taylor, who put forward the amendment, has listened to us, with the new government amendment makes it clear that landlords can use a valid Section 21 or Section 8 notice to apply to court at any time during the transition window.

“While hundreds of amendments have already been proposed that fact that this adjustment (and others) has been put forward by Baroness Taylor, means it will almost certainly be included in the final version of the Bill.”

RRB returns for debate

The Bill is scheduled for further debate in the House of Lords on 22 April during the Committee Stage, where peers will have the opportunity to suggest further tweaks and offer detailed critiques.

Ahead of this, the NRLA has been actively engaging with Lords’ members, advocating for practical alterations that enhance the Bill.

Among the changes they endorse are provisions allowing landlords to evict from all student accommodations, not just houses in multiple occupation (HMOs).

The organisation has also proposed establishing a minimum six-month tenancy period and refining the rent adjustment mechanism with oversight from the Valuation Office Agency to dismiss unjust rent challenges.

It also wants protection for landlords against non-payment of initial rent and evaluating the Bill’s impact on the private rental market.

Amendments need backing

Mr Wood warns that while these amendments are promising, their inclusion in the Bill still requires backing from the House of Commons.

To help explain the new amendments, the NRLA has produced this video:


Share This Article


Comments

Rob

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

16:34 PM, 8th April 2025, About a month ago

These amendments need careful consideration and this takes time! The NRLA's persistent attempts to get the Government to declare an implementation date, doesn't help this. In the proposed amendment to remove the section 21's 3 month deadline, what will the amended transition time be? How long will an already served section 21 be valid for after implementation of the TRB?

Judith Wordsworth

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

17:29 PM, 8th April 2025, About a month ago

Amendments proposed to the RRB, even if put forward by Baroness Taylor or anyone else, does not mean any "will almost certainly be included in the final version of the Bill".

This despotic Government will do as they please.

I am more worried by Labours election campaign promise that THEY will INSTRUCT the Courts to implement a hardship test for the new s8 Ground 1. ie Who will be in greater hardship should the Court grant possession to the Landlord.

Not only is the answer glaringly obvious BUT this IS the thin end of the wedge as far as our Constitution is concerned and the Separation of Powers and the checks and balances on the Executive (Government).

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More