9 months ago | 4 comments
Private renters across England and Wales are being deprived of £169 million in potential interest from their tenancy deposits each year, Generation Rent says.
It says that with £5.37 billion in deposits held in government-accredited schemes generate just £17 million in benefits annually under the current system.
The organisation is now calling for a Renters’ Support Fund, inspired by an Australian model, which would consolidate existing deposit schemes into a single, non-profit custodial system.
This would ensure all deposits earn interest for tenants, rather than landlords or agents.
It also says that the money generated will help tenants sue landlords over their living conditions.
Generation Rent’s deputy chief executive, Dan Wilson-Craw, said: “Renters face many disadvantages in the housing system.
“Around half lack savings, making moving home a more painful process than it should be.
“Limited access to legal support means it is hard to take action if your landlord is failing to keep your home safe.”
He added: “So it is a scandal that the billions of pounds of renters’ money tied up in deposit schemes is not being used to improve the experience of renting, and in many cases sees landlords and letting agents collecting the interest.
“With deposit schemes’ contracts up for renewal, the government has a golden opportunity to get renters’ money working for renters.”
Generation Rent claims that if the entire deposit pool were invested at the Bank of England’s 4.25% base rate, it could yield £226 million annually.
After accounting for £40 million in administrative costs, the remaining funds could support tenants in multiple ways.
That would include £50 million to bolster legal aid, enabling renters to challenge landlords over unsafe living conditions.
Another £25.5 million would facilitate deposit ‘passporting’, allowing tenants to transfer deposits between tenancies, cutting moving costs by an average of £817.
Also, £6.7 million would support deposit guarantee schemes for renters facing financial hardship or homelessness.
Generation Rent says that any surplus interest could be returned to tenants, separate from landlord claims.
Generation Rent is now urging the government to phase out these insurance-backed schemes in favour of a unified custodial model.
Its research also found that 16% of tenants borrowed to cover moving costs, while 29% dipped into savings.
For those unable to afford deposits, unregulated ‘deposit alternative’ products—often non-refundable fees—are common, particularly among disadvantaged groups.
Seven percent of tenants used such schemes, with 51% receiving benefits and 28% reporting disabilities, compared to 39% and 24% of the overall sample, respectively.
This reliance on costly alternatives underscores, the organisation says, a ‘poverty premium’ for vulnerable renters.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Government to buy empty homes to house asylum seekersNext Article
Rents are £417 a month higher than five years ago
9 months ago | 4 comments
9 months ago | 11 comments
9 months ago | 9 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 1996 - Articles: 21
11:18 AM, 29th July 2025, About 9 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Smiffy at 29/07/2025 – 08:51
Sorry, but that is not a good idea. I explained here why “passporting” does not work.
Member Since December 2021 - Comments: 161
5:35 PM, 29th July 2025, About 9 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 29/07/2025 – 11:18
I had a different idea of how it would work. Based on your interpretation, it wouldn’t work.
Personally, I’ve gone the insurance route, and the deposits sit in my account earning me a return. The gain it makes, will go towards any damage/rent shortfall that the deposits don’t cover. My tenants tend to stay for longer periods, typically 5-10 years, so the insurance cost isn’t an issue.
In the event of a tenant leaving, I’m more than happy to transfer it directly to their new landlord, on return of an undamaged property. If it could be done within DPS, that could work, but it doesn’t worry me either way.
Member Since May 2023 - Comments: 224
9:04 AM, 14th August 2025, About 8 months ago
GENERATION BENT ARE LIARS
The data shows that their allegation is a lie.
80% to 90% of tenants get their rental deposit back claims new data https://share.google/DXS7ctLgSwhiJFUsZ
Member Since January 2016 - Comments: 297 - Articles: 1
6:29 PM, 14th August 2025, About 8 months ago
“Around half lack savings, making moving home a more painful process than it should be”
Well fancy that?