Put it down to experience?

Put it down to experience?

Hand reaching toward a house-shaped safe representing secure rental deposits
1:26 PM, 4th July 2022, 4 years ago 16

A friend of mine, also a landlord, used a letting agency to find a tenant. She assumed the letting agency would also protect the deposit.

When the tenant came to leave, she found that the deposit had not been protected. She immediately refunded one month’s rent£2500.

Next, she received a solicitor’s letter asking for another month’s rent plus £600 in fees for legal costs, saying that if she went to court, they would claim three times the deposit.

Is this legal and correct?

Many thanks

Tom


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since January 2020 - Comments: 559

    10:58 AM, 6th July 2022, About 4 years ago

    Reply to the comment left by Suresh Parikh at 06/07/2022 – 10:51
    To be fair to Ian he did say you’d need to read the agent’s ToB to know definitively.

    Ultimately the buck stops legally with the landlord.

    If the landlord’s contract with the agent required the deposit to be protected by the agent, but they failed to do so, then they are in the wrong contractually, but it’s up the the landlord (not the tenant) to pursue the agent.

    If dealing with the deposit is silent in the contract then the agent presumably has no liability.

    As a long term landlord and agent I find it odd that an agent would not set out how to deal with a deposit, but perhaps I am not surprised. It makes we wonder what actually happened to the cash – is there more to the story than we are being told?

  • Member Since September 2021 - Comments: 213

    2:33 PM, 6th July 2022, About 4 years ago

    Thank you.
    I regret you have not understood my comment.
    Let us assume under the ToB, the Agent is not allowed or authorised to take a deposit.
    Or, simply, he just not deal with deposits.
    He then knows the limit of his express/implied authority.
    To use neutral words, in taking a deposit, he is not off the hook.

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 1996 - Articles: 21

    3:21 PM, 6th July 2022, About 4 years ago

    Unless Tom fills in the gaps I am not sure that speculation is profitable.

    If I did not have a managing agent I would not expect the letting agent to have the account with DPS or TDS but to have it in the landlord’s name.

    Did the agent take the deposit towards his 10% plus VAT commission for finding a tenant?

  • Member Since July 2022 - Comments: 2

    6:49 PM, 10th July 2022, About 4 years ago

    Perhaps I’m missing something amongst all the great and good looking to take a pitch at the agent, but wouldn’t the matter of the tenancy deposit and the scheme in which it is lodged or registered with, be set out in the tenancy agreement which the landlord either should have or, failing that, can request ?

  • Member Since September 2021 - Comments: 213

    12:10 PM, 11th July 2022, About 4 years ago

    Hi Nigel
    We are in the realm of law, and have to be careful of the words we use.
    A tenancy agreement is between the landlord and the tenant.
    In this thread, we are using Terms of Business (ToB) for any agreement between the Landlord and the Agent.
    Hope this helps.
    Yes, my AST does give all details about the deposit.
    I tell all my prospective tenants that the deposit is their money and the law makes me responsible for it. You have to pay me the deposit and not to the Agent. You may pay first monthly rent to the Agent.

  • Member Since June 2022 - Comments: 111

    12:33 PM, 11th July 2022, About 4 years ago

    The Lettings Agent always transfer the Deposit and the First months rent to me before the commencement of the tenancy.
    I can’t understand why a landlord would work this way

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or