Peers warn tenant access could hinder social housing electrical safety checks

Tenant refusing an electrician entry for electrical safety checks at a social housing property.
12:01 AM, 15th October 2026, 3 weeks ago 2

The government has acknowledged the challenges social housing landlords can face when tenants refuse access for electrical safety checks.

A House of Lords debate on electrical safety checks in the private rented sector and social housing also discussed the introduction of Phase 2 of Awaab’s Law in social housing.

The news comes as the government has launched a consultation on extending Awaab’s Law to the private rented sector.

Difficulty gaining access

During the debate, Baroness Pinnock from the Liberal Democrats raised the question of what happens when a tenant refuses entry or does not answer the door to allow essential safety checks such as electrical tests.

Lord Jamieson from the Conservatives also raised the issue of tenants’ responsibilities when it comes to electrical safety checks. He questioned whether everything should be down to the landlord and said that a tenant’s view of what is reasonable may differ from that of the landlord.

In response, Labour’s Lord Wilson of Sedgefield said social housing landlords must be able to demonstrate that they have taken reasonable steps to comply with electrical safety requirements, even when difficulties arise in gaining access to a property.

He said: “A social housing landlord is not in breach of their duty to comply with the remedial notice served under the regulations if they can show that they have taken all reasonable steps to comply.

“A social housing landlord could show reasonable steps by keeping copies of all communications that they have had with their tenants and with electricians as they try to arrange the work, including any replies that they have had.

“Social housing landlords may also want to provide other evidence that the installation is in good condition while they attempt to arrange work. The government are aware of growing concerns regarding the legal framework surrounding access to social housing. Ministers and officials are giving careful consideration to the matter and are working closely with residents, providers and other experts to examine whether future clarification is necessary.”

Awaab’s Law does not apply to overheating

Lord Wilson of Sedgefield also clarified that Awaab’s Law does not apply to overheating.

He said: “Awaab’s law does not apply to overheating which is due solely to outside temperatures being particularly high, including because of climate change. It is about ensuring that landlords take prompt action where a defect or deficiency in a home is creating a serious excess heat hazard for a tenant.

“For example, this could include a window that cannot be opened, defective ventilation or a fault with a heating system that is causing excessive indoor temperatures. That is fair, because social housing landlords cannot be blamed for outdoor temperatures and climate change, but the social housing landlord can address these practical issues.”

The government has launched a consultation on extending Awaab’s Law to the private rented sector. However, the government’s own impact assessment admits that extending the legislation could have financial implications for landlords and cause some landlords to leave the market.


Share This Article

  • Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1645 - Articles: 1

    9:14 AM, 16th October 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    “ … the government’s own impact assessment admits that extending the legislation could have financial implications for landlords and cause some landlords to leave the market.”

    When will government realise that the majority of issues that Awaab’s Law seeks to rectify is down to tenant lifestyle and out of the hands of PRS landlords.

    Can a landlord force a tenant to open windows? No
    Can a landlord force a tenant to adequately heat their home? No
    Can a landlord force a tenant to do cleaning in their home? No
    Can a landlord stop a tenant hanging wet/damp washing indoors on Aires’s or radiators? No
    Can a landlord stop a tenant from taping up air vents? No
    Can a landlord stop a tenant from switching off extractor fans? No
    Can a landlord force a tenant to put lids on saucepans and frying pans when cooking? No
    Can a landlord force entry to inspect their properties? No

    When the photos, videos and written documentation on checkin and even prior advertising show a rental property’s condition and that condition deteriorates for reasons not due to building faults then the fault can only be down to tenant lifestyle. Not the fault of the landlord.

    To be fined for something that a landlord has no control over is not only ludicrous but unjust and will see many, not just some, landlords leaving the PRS business.

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3783 - Articles: 5

    12:05 PM, 16th October 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    all this article goes to show is that the tenant themselves is the biggest factor of all.
    How many social LL’s make sure the tenant is even aware of the electrical compliance checks the provider has to make for example and that it is a legal requirement?
    I think its more of a case of not bothering to engage with them until something needs doing, then when it does make it very official (demand like) , then fall back on the ‘lack of access’ as a way of giving an excuse for not being able to carry it out.
    Councils/HA are well behind on the basics still like gas and elec certs despite this requirement being in place for YEARS. One look at the SH Ombudsman reports and you can see the level of non compliance. All this cant always be down to lack of tenant access….
    They simply don’t want to admit the importance of the checks. Why rattle the tenant cage and lead them to potentially using the lack of compliance as a stick to beat you with? Nope – keep quiet, and just blame it on lack of access.
    The PRS though on the other hand and good landlords are more concerned with compliance as property it is a personal asset. I make it very clear to tenants that if they do not allow access (plenty of notice etc given, often weeks) then they are in direct breach of their tenancy if there is any unnecessary/unreasonable obfuscation to delay it. All details are recorded on their rental record.
    Only last week I got possession (under old S21 & S8 claim) on basis that I have been unable to carry out a gas check for 9 months because of the tenant never ensuring there was gas and electric flowing to be able to carry the checks out. (refusing to top up the meter and not following up on DHP’s to ask for further financial help).


Related Articles