Non-development covenant on an ex-LA house

Non-development covenant on an ex-LA house

11:00 AM, 23rd November 2017, About 6 years ago 14

Text Size

Help sought, please, to get around a non-development covenant on an ex-LA house.

We live in an ex-LA semi on a corner plot in a commuter town in Hertfordshire. The plot is large enough to add at least one more dwelling, and there are smaller (non-LA) plots nearby that have had two and even three new houses built on them (probably not ex-LA), so Planning is not likely to be an issue.

However, at the time it was sold off to the previous owner under Right-to-Buy, the LA put a covenant on the property preventing the plot being split. I asked the LA a few years back about relaxing that part of the covenant, and they replied:

“In the event that the Council is able to agree to a particular proposal as not being detrimental to the neighbourhood, the Council is bound under s123 of the Local Government Act to obtain full value for the landed interest being granted” [in modifying that covenant]. You will appreciate that this would be the same with any private landowner. The price sought is an equal share of the net profit arising out of the relaxation. The net profit is the actual benefit produced after allowing all outgoings including any diminution in the value of the existing property.”

So even though we would be doing all the work and taking all the commercial risk for the construction works and sale, they would expect to take half the net profit created by building and selling any extra dwellings. This killed the idea at the time, but I am hoping things may have changed with this housing crisis?

One solution could be building to let (i.e. never selling them off), but their definition of “benefit” in their last sentence above, might still trigger such a payment to them.

Has anyone faced and overcome similar situations?

Richard


Share This Article


Comments

RichDad

9:16 AM, 26th November 2017, About 6 years ago

Neil: that link and the section "Local Authorities as Covenant Owners" look useful as a starting point, thanks. Research continues ! 🙂

Neil Harvey

20:26 PM, 5th January 2018, About 6 years ago

Richard,
Any updates?

RichDad

10:48 AM, 7th January 2018, About 6 years ago

Hi Neil,
To be honest, I've been too busy (Christmas, major refurb/extension/HMO conversion, daily matters) that I haven't had time to focus enough time and energy to pursue this one too. That's why I was seeking a shortcut via the forum in the first place. I'll get back to it shortly, though! 😉
Regards,
Richard

Ray Mo

16:51 PM, 7th January 2018, About 6 years ago

Sorry for the detour, appreciate anyone's views:

Just by way of background for my own case, I had a 12 month tenancy agreement (March 2016) which has since rolled onto a periodic tenancy agreement.

This agreement was for a tenant and I "thankfully" had their guarantor included in the tenancy agreement.

Separately, for the tenant's deposit (as far as I am unaware is unrelated to the guarantor), I had only given prescribed info to the tenant and nothing for the guarantor.

Have I landed myself in hot water.

I have so far only issued a section 21 (no rent arrears)...

When it comes.to the possession order I had intended to bundle in all the court related fees by way of a Money Judgement. But now wary I'm case my prescribed information was not sufficient due to omitting the guarantor.

Appreciate any thoughts on my situation...

Thanks
Ray

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now