Non compliant service charge regime since 1993?

Non compliant service charge regime since 1993?

0:01 AM, 8th March 2024, About 2 months ago 4

Text Size

Hi, my daughter is a newcomer in a block of flats. A young NHS carer and a first-time buyer the lease is for 999 years. A company (let’s call them X) holds the freehold via a share in the company she has a 1/35th share in the freehold.

The leaseholders (most of whom take little interest in the property) may elect directors there are 3 directors. Born 1939, 1942 and 1950. Appointed in 1996, 2010 and 2021 respectively.

The X company appointed a “new” managing agent in 2006. That agent is a sole trader and is regulated by RICS. The managing agent has produced year-end accounts for company X to 30th June each year in accordance with the Accounting Reference recorded for company X at Companies House. These accounts purport to be an account for both company and service charge purposes.

Service charge “requests” are however issued for the year commencing 1st January each year – not 1st July. These requests do not purport to be “interim” or payments on account. There is no balancing charge raised at the year’s end.

I have seen the Service Charge Requests issued in December 2022 and 2023. Neither carries the usual statutory notice. In both “requests” there is an estimate of £10k PA for the water however the bill is presently running at £18 to 19K – clearly a case for a balancing charge or payments coming out of “unspent service charge” from years past. This seems very wrong to me.

There are other miscalculations and indeed omissions which make the debit balance much worse. It all seems so wrong. The situation could be improved if there were to be a final year account and balancing charge. Is there a mechanism? YES!

The 1982 lease provides that proper books shall be kept with a year end of 31st March each year. An accountant is to certify the total and proportionate service charge costs. Within 3 months of the account (31st March I presume) the company is to serve a written notice confirming the total and proportionate amounts so certified.

The leaseholder is to pay within 21 days of service of the notice (or receive credit for) the balance by which the proportionate amount exceeds or falls short of the total sums paid by the Lessee to the company X. Clearly this is not happening. Why not?

At the last AGM with reference to the service charge liability the Chairman who has been 10 years in post said he was not going to require payment of service charges which people could not pay!

I have asked whether there has been a change to the lease either in the form of a deed of variation signed by all the leaseholders (in which case it has neither been disclosed to my daughter or registered at HM Land Registry) or a pursuant to a tribunal hearing (but why would there be a need to seek a variation to the lease where there is already what appears to be a perfectly good structure in place?).

I have not received a reply to written or verbal requests the last being at the company AGM on 25th November 2022. (Yes – we have not had notice of one since and still await the accounts for the year end 30th June 2023!)

The Board refused to speak at the last AGM. The Board appointed the Managing Agent to chair the meeting. Table A Regs 55 & 56 were not followed. The question raised at the AGM is not reported in the Minutes. Neither is the managing agent’s failure to respond.

The Board now seek to exclude me from further meetings. They say that my daughter cannot appoint me as her proxy. Since the last AGM the board has again sent out a service charge request for the year commencing 1st January 2024 without the statutory notice on the reverse.

The history
Companies House records show that no accounts have been filed with a year end 31st March since 1993. I understand that one can have an accounting reference date other than 31st March for company X and still maintain a service charge accounting period ending 31st March.

The chances of this happening are remote to non existent given the extensive accounting paperwork I have and recent accounts and service charge accounts issued to my daughter consistent with the abandonment of the 31 March accounting date. I therefore believe that the service charge accounting process has been non-compliant since 31st March 1993.

Am I alone in smelling a rat? Any thoughts as to how to address the issue at modest cost?

Thanks,

Paul


Share This Article


Comments

Graham Bowcock

13:17 PM, 8th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Clearly the directors are clueless as to their legal obligations.

When you say your daughert is a newcomer, it begs the question as to why she bought minto the flat as her solicitor should have flagged the problems. I've seen leasehold sales unravel for far less serious problems. Her solicitor should have requested up to date accounts and company records (what about fire safety and the like?) before agreeing the pruchase contract. If these documents were not forthcomning then I'm staggered that the solicitor did not draw a line under it.

As for modest cost, I'd be more concerend about getting it right and get a decent property lawyer on it pdq.

Kizzie

14:45 PM, 8th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Agree with previous post except before you go to a solicitor properly experienced in leasehold law, I would do your own homework.
Your daughter bought a lease to a flat with a share of the freehold.
This means her primary obligations are to the Memorandum & Articles downloadable at companies house and the Companies Act of this limited liability company, and separate role to comply with her obligations under her lease a legally binding contract. With
a share of freehold she has freeholder obligations and fiduciary duties along with the
Directors to the M&A under CA 2006.
Your daughter has legal shareholder rights and its usual to allow proxy votes. Google the forms.
Company accounts are different from
service charge accounts must be protected in a trust/client account for the Lessor’s block maintenance costs in her lease under section 42 landlord &tenant act 1987 in name of man.co. and individual lessee.
Read the lease. Your post suggest the sc not disposed of in accordance with her lease and may be false accounting.
The risk is the man co will be struck off and her lease invalid and the flat unsaleable
Yet another conveyance where there was no due diligence nor aml
check by solicitor/conveyancers.
This situation is not uncommon.

2 Lucerne

10:55 AM, 9th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Graham Bowcock at 08/03/2024 - 13:17
Thankyou.
I have already anticipated that avenue of approach.
My daughter has already sent for the complete conveyancing file.
Having asked for the file I understand that the solicitors are having a little difficulty and are asking why she needs the file!
The solicitors came as part and parcel of a Lloyds Bank "finance package".
Having banked with Lloyds for 66 years I anticipate an interesting conversation with my "relationship manager"

2 Lucerne

10:58 AM, 9th March 2024, About 2 months ago

Many thanks

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now