MPs claim EPC upgrades are no excuse for landlords to hike rents

MPs claim EPC upgrades are no excuse for landlords to hike rents

EPC graph with a house and on up arrow and a paound sign
12:01 AM, 29th July 2025, 8 months ago 35

An Early Day Motion (EDM) to prevent landlords from hiking rents following EPC upgrades has received support from Labour and Green MPs.

EDMs are mainly symbolic and rarely debated in Parliament, but Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy argues that the Renters’ Rights Bill does not do enough to protect tenants from eviction or rent increases after energy efficiency improvements to a property.

Generation Rent has previously claimed landlords can easily afford EPC upgrades because they are mortgage-free.

The Labour government has proposed that all private rented properties must meet an EPC rating of C by 2030, with a 2028 deadline for new tenancies.

Protect renters from rent increases

Ms. Ribeiro-Addy, who tabled the EDM, claims the Renters’ Rights Bill fails to protect tenants from rent hikes when landlords receive government grants for energy efficiency upgrades.

Green Party co-leader Carla Denyer and Independent MP Jeremy Corbyn are among the MPs who have signed the motion.

The MPs claim that government grants for energy efficiency upgrades should be classified as contributions made by the tenant, not the landlord, to protect renters from rent increases.

The motion says: “The Renters’ Rights Bill is a positive first step in addressing the power imbalance between tenants and landlords, but does not offer sufficient protections for renters in the case of retrofitting. We are concerned that, without further protections, renters, particularly those on low incomes, will not enjoy the benefits of a warmer home and lower bills.

“We believe the government should protect renters from rent increases through classifying grants as an improvement contributed by the tenant, not the landlord, at the First-tier Tribunal rent assessment process and protect renters from eviction through introducing a protected period from eviction after a government grant is used to retrofit a privately rented property.”

Landlords spend thousands of pounds on EPC upgrades

Despite MPs’ claims, landlords spend thousands of pounds on energy-efficiency improvements, with the average cost of upgrading a sub-C rated property to a C or above in England costing more than £7,000.

According to estate agents Benham and Reeves, despite the improvement being expected to create an annual energy bill saving of £280, it would take the average landlord an astonishing 26.4 years to meet the expected annual cash savings.

The government have also rejected an amendment in the Renters’ Rights Bill which would have given renters stronger protections against rent hikes when a landlord receives a grant.

The Labour government has also seemed to confirm that landlords can raise rents to pay for EPC upgrades, with Justice Minister Sarah Sackman confirming in Parliament that landlords can legally factor in the cost of improving a property’s EPC rating when setting ‘higher market rents.’


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since January 2025 - Comments: 13

    8:31 AM, 2nd August 2025, About 8 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 02/08/2025 – 08:22
    I guess I was being generous! But yes, to all those points. And yes, landlords are running a business. A business which carries risk, which is why many landlords are now incurring the additional cost of rent insurance.

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1999

    1:52 PM, 4th August 2025, About 8 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 02/08/2025 – 08:22
    Yes and that’s part of the problem. Because you are unable to offset your finance costs against your rents the amount of rent increase that you need to apply is higher than would otherwise be the case. In effect, the government is making you a tax collector and the tenants are paying the price for that.

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5

    2:37 PM, 4th August 2025, About 8 months ago

    if I improve the quality of the PRIVATE property I let, then I have every right to charge for the cost of the changes made.

    Usually I determine this by looking at what similar properties provide and what the going rent is to make my property attractive to the same client base. Decisions are made accordingly. Why would I make any upgrades that make no return on investment? What am I – a charity?

    If I am forced to make these changes then the cost is simply going to be forced onto the tenants via a rent increase.

    You don’t need the RRB – the reality is current tenants will have secure tenancies by default of them not affording to be able to move anywhere else!

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5

    2:41 PM, 4th August 2025, About 8 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Billy Gunn at 31/07/2025 – 05:39
    then not a lot of people will be moving at all then, slowing up even more property turnover – which is exactly what the government needs to happen.

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1999

    4:02 PM, 4th August 2025, About 8 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by G H at 02/08/2025 – 08:31
    My prediction would be that if the RRB goes ahead in its present form then the cost of rent insurance would go up because the risk of being unable to remove non-paying tenants would be higher.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles