1 month ago
Hello, My lender is seeking to impose monthly fines for breaching my mortgage conditions, following the local council’s decision that three unrelated sharers now constitute an HMO, even though it’s a modest 3-bed terraced house with no bedroom locks.
The previous threshold, when I took out the mortgage, was four. My lender doesn’t do HMO properties.
This is a case of government changes to the law forcing landlords into an involuntary breach.
Is that fair?
Does anybody else face the same problem?
Thank you,
Richard
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Government unveils far-reaching home buying and selling reformsNext Article
Right to Rent guidance too long claims Propertymark
1 month ago
1 month ago
2 months ago | 1 comments
Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 7
4:59 PM, 25th June 2026, About 4 weeks ago
Good news
Hope that’s the lash you hear from them
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 633
5:21 PM, 25th June 2026, About 4 weeks ago
Lets hope they don’t move the goalposts again and that this is the last time you will hear from them.
Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 239
1:14 AM, 12th July 2026, About 1 week ago
When your current deal expires, move to another lender that is more flexible. TMW seems to be the best in that regard. They still count up to 4 unrelated tenants on individual tenancies as a standard let. They also have some of the lowest rates on the market. Downside is that they also support many of the anti-landlord tenant activist groups through the Nationwide Foundation.