11 months ago | 2 comments
Landlords who make a minor selective licensing mistake, such as missing a renewal notice, can be plunged into severe financial distress, with penalties reaching astronomical sums, one expert warns.
Local councils, which are intensifying their enforcement of selective licensing schemes, are imposing hefty fines that threaten landlords’ economic stability.
Phil Turtle, a property compliance specialist at Landlord Licensing & Defence, highlights the dire consequences of non-compliance.
He said: “Forgetting to renew a selective licence isn’t just a slap on the wrist – it can be a financial catastrophe.
“I’ve seen landlords lose everything because they didn’t have a system in place to track compliance.
“One missed deadline can cost you £105,000, and if you’re operating through a limited company, that fine could double to £210,000.”
In one case in Waltham Forest, London, a landlord faced a £66,000 penalty for failing to license a house divided into two flats.
Mr Turtle explains: “The council hit the landlord’s limited company with £16,500 per flat and then fined him personally as the sole director another £16,500 per flat.
“That’s £66,000 for a simple oversight – and now he’s forced to sell the property to cover the cost.”
The stakes are even higher for landlords with Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs), Mr Turtle warns.
One landlord, he says, who let an HMO licence expire, incurred a staggering £105,000 in fines.
The penalties included £12,500 for operating without a licence, £17,000 for violating HMO Management Regulation 4, £8,500 for Regulation 7 infractions and £12,500 for breaching Electrical Safety Regulations.
Mr Turtle said: “It started with a missed renewal while the landlord was on holiday.
“By the time the council got involved, the landlord was 18 months unlicensed, tenants were applying for Rent Repayment Orders, and the fines were unavoidable.”
Mr Turtle says that landlords need to be aware that councils are shifting to a stringent, automated enforcement approach, with well-resourced housing officers targeting non-compliant landlords.
That means incomplete paperwork, missing certificates or unrecorded inspections leave landlords vulnerable.
He says: “The councils aren’t here to hold your hand.
“They’re a self-funding operation, and every fine they issue fuels their next investigation.”
Mr Turtle is urging landlords to adopt rigorous compliance systems to monitor licensing deadlines, maintain valid certificates and conduct regular inspections.
He adds: “This isn’t about scaremongering – it’s about reality.
“The laws have been in place for years, and enforcement is only getting sharper. Don’t let a forgotten date cost you your livelihood.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Most Scots back rent controls - Poll
11 months ago | 2 comments
11 months ago | 4 comments
11 months ago | 12 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since July 2015 - Comments: 9
3:06 PM, 17th May 2025, About 11 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Paul Cummings at 17/05/2025 – 14:48
Am I mistaken that selective licensing can only be in place for a maximum of 5 years?
If so, then I had paid for the 5 years.
Member Since July 2015 - Comments: 9
3:59 PM, 17th May 2025, About 11 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Paul Cummings at 17/05/2025 – 15:06
And Breathe. Is max of 5 years and I’ve found all my payments.
Note to self. Don’t read article when out and about.
Had totally forgotten the 5 year limit and was stressing I hadn’t renewed. What a Numpty.
Member Since September 2024 - Comments: 95
2:32 PM, 19th May 2025, About 11 months ago
I’ve been wondering why a Tenant/Landlord system which, on the whole, worked very well for decades suddenly needed changing.
It DIDN’T!! But every change made is costing Landlords more and filling the coffers of LA’s and Government.
So basically they don’t give a toss about homeless Tenants or Landlords leaving the sector in droves. As long as they get their money from those of you who stay. Do you think things will improve for you or continue to get worse?
And what do Tenants and Landlords get out of it? FOXTROT ALFA!!!
Member Since November 2018 - Comments: 48
11:38 PM, 19th May 2025, About 11 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Godfrey Jones at 19/05/2025 – 14:32
Yes, they are raking it in re licensing and fines, but they must be spending way more than they will ever receive in housing homeless families.
It never made any sense from a financial point of view. Increase taxation and regulations to put Landlords out of business. Make thousands of families homeless in the process cosing the taxpayer millions. I’m pretty sure if someone in Goverment actually crunched the numbers they would realise that the changes since 2015 have cost the Government and taxpayers millions. And for what benefit?
– thousands of families homeless
– thousands of lanlords forced to sell
– property prices higher than ever
– first time buyers still struggling to get on the ladder
It was mad.
The only people who have benefited are highly paid lawyers, who deal with all the evictions. And rich build to rent companies. Everyone else is suffering, even Government, local and national. It breaks my heart that we have so many children living the whole of their childhood in temporary accommodation. Yet we continually put people in power whose main goal is to make the rich and powerful, more rich and powerful.
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2188 - Articles: 2
6:18 AM, 20th May 2025, About 11 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Zen at 19/05/2025 – 23:38
“Yet we continually put people in power whose main goal is to make the rich and powerful, more rich and powerful.”
Because we have no choice, all the candidates seem to be corrupt.