8 months ago | 3 comments
The government has announced changes to rent repayment orders under the Renters’ Rights Act.
New changes include offences for providing false information to the Private Rented Sector (PRS) Database and knowingly or recklessly misusing a possession ground.
The news comes after the government published a list of civil financial penalties, under which landlords could be fined up to £6,000 for discriminating against those on benefits and children.
A rent repayment order is a mechanism where a landlord who has committed an offence can be ordered to repay an amount of rent to the tenant or local authority.
The Renters’ Rights Act guidance, says the Act will extend rent repayment orders which will now include: “To the offences of knowingly or recklessly misusing a possession ground, breach of a restriction on letting or marketing a dwelling-house, continued tenancy reform breach after imposition of a financial penalty, continued breach of landlord redress scheme regulations after imposition of a financial penalty for this breach, provision of false information to the PRS Database when purporting to comply with PRS Database regulations and continued failure to register with the PRS Database after imposition of a financial penalty for this breach.”
Under the new rules, the maximum amount of rent a landlord can be ordered to repay will double from 12 to 24 months. The period in which a tenant or a council can apply for a rent repayment order after an offence has been committed will also be extended from 12 to 24 months.
Rent repayment orders will also apply to superior landlords and company directors, which the government says will “ensure criminal rent-to-rent arrangements can be properly held to account”.
The government has also announced that landlords who have previously been subject to enforcement action for an offence will be required to pay the maximum rent repayment order amount if they commit the same offence again, in a move the government say will crack down on repeat offenders.
The government guidance says: “Where a landlord has been convicted of or received a financial penalty for licensing offences or any of the relevant offences across the Act, they will be required to pay the maximum rent repayment order amount.
“This will ensure the deterrent effect is equally strong across all listed offences and that the deterrent effect is increased for the offences to which this provision did not previously apply.”
Property118 commercial reality check
Many landlords will read this and feel the ground shifting again beneath their feet. That reaction is understandable. The rules are expanding, the penalties are heavier and the margin for error is narrowing. None of this reflects badly on landlords who already act responsibly. It reflects a policy environment that increasingly assumes bad faith and then regulates accordingly.
What landlords should do next
Protect yourself against misunderstanding, not just misconduct. Keep written evidence explaining why possession grounds are used, even when the reason feels obvious. The risk now sits as much in interpretation as in behaviour.
Prepare for the PRS Database before it exists. Even though the database is not yet operational, begin aligning tenancy records, licensing details and ownership information now. When registration becomes mandatory, readiness will matter more than speed.
Clarify accountability across all arrangements. Where companies, directors or superior landlords are involved, document control and responsibility clearly. This is preparation, not admission of fault.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
8 months ago | 3 comments
5 months ago | 24 comments
2 years ago | 2 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2022 - Comments: 89
11:09 AM, 17th December 2025, About 4 months ago
Is it any wonder that I am now receiving an ever increasing number of people asking daily, “have I any properties to rent”, as my landlord is selling up?
Member Since February 2024 - Comments: 69
12:00 PM, 17th December 2025, About 4 months ago
Has anyone heard if Ms Reeves has paid compensation/fine for not knowing her property should have been licensed? If she gets away with it … there could be ‘bother?’
Member Since February 2023 - Comments: 87
12:41 PM, 17th December 2025, About 4 months ago
Why is this criminal government treating us like criminals?
Member Since June 2023 - Comments: 4
6:17 PM, 17th December 2025, About 4 months ago
Just feel landlords are unfairly being punished.
The rules they have come out with are very harsh and impossible.
I understand that the renters reform is to bring about uniformity especially for the rouge landlords out there but we are not all like that.
The vast majority of the landlords take care of their tenants
Just feel like a criminal simply for owning another property
Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 202
10:02 PM, 17th December 2025, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Nee Gill at 17/12/2025 – 18:17
The rules are clearly designed to create a “hostile environment” and a culture of fear amongst ordinary landlords, with penalties that only well-financed “professional” big players would be able to shoulder by reason of their scale.
In other words, it’s all about the corporatisation of the sector, with corporate-sized fines for corporate-sized players.
Member Since November 2025 - Comments: 8
11:58 PM, 17th December 2025, About 4 months ago
It’s basically more pressure on landlords. Rent repayment orders are being widened so tenants and councils can claim back up to 24 months of rent instead of 12, and more things now count as offences including giving wrong info to the PRS database or using the wrong possession ground.
It means paperwork and evidence are going to matter even more, because a small mistake could end up costing a lot. If you use agents or rent to rent setups, everyone involved needs to be clear on who’s responsible for what.
Worth getting ahead of the PRS database now by tightening up records, and making sure any possession notices you serve have a clear paper trail. The rules are getting stricter, so being organised is going to count for a lot.
Member Since July 2023 - Comments: 32
4:47 PM, 18th December 2025, About 4 months ago
As I keep saying one rule for “them” another for us. Lakanal House – 5 dead. Grenfell 72. No one losses their jobs, no fines no corporate manslaughter charges. My tenant has shared with today more images of the damage done by a leak from a council flat over. Almost 12 months after its been reported. Tenant moving out. Court proceedings served and nothing. What hope for me to rerent or sell.
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1438 - Articles: 1
8:57 AM, 20th December 2025, About 4 months ago
About time ALL PRS landlords still in this business issued s21 notices to ALL their tenants on the same date with the same expiry date to make this government wonder what and how they will address 4.7 million families (approx 10m people) potentially homeless on the same day.
No one need follow through and can even let their tenants know they won’t but this government is solely responsible should landlords follow through.