5 months ago | 1 comments
Landlords continue to wait weeks to gain court hearings to regain possession, as the Renters’ Rights Act could trigger an avalanche of claims.
Under the current Section 21 route, landlords can repossess a property without the need for a court hearing.
However, if a tenant challenges the claim or the application is incomplete, a hearing may be required, which can significantly delay possession.
In response to a written Parliamentary question about how many possession claims relating to Section 21 notices are currently awaiting court hearings and the average waiting time, a government minister admitted landlords can be waiting weeks.
Justice Minister Sarah Sackman said: “A Section 21 notice provides for an accelerated court process, usually without a hearing. However, if the application is not in order or the tenant challenges the claim, a hearing may be scheduled.
“The Civil Procedure Rules stipulate that possession claims should be listed within four to eight weeks of a claim being issued. The most recent published statistics, covering the period July to September 2025 show that the median time from claim to order is 7.6 weeks.
“The government has set out its roadmap for implementing the Renters’ Rights Act 2025. Private landlords will not be able to serve new Section 21 notices on their tenants on or after 1 May 2026.”
The possession order is the court granting the landlord the right to repossess the property, but actual repossession often takes longer, as further steps are required to enforce the order.
The latest Ministry of Justice figures show that the median time from claim to warrant is 15.3 weeks, up from 14 weeks in the same period in 2024, while median time from claim to actual repossession has increased to 27.4 weeks, up from 24.4 weeks.
After 1 May 2026, every case will need to go through a court hearing, and landlords will only be able to seek possession by demonstrating specific grounds.
As previously reported on Property118, the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) warns that the court system is not prepared to handle the expected surge in claims following the abolition of Section 21.
Ben Beadle chief executive of the NRLA said: “This is a disaster waiting to happen.
“If landlords are already facing an almost eight-month wait to legally take possession of their homes at a time when the number of claims is falling, then what can we expect when the inevitable avalanche of claims drops post-Renters’ Rights Bill?
“Ministers have repeatedly claimed that the courts will be “ready” to manage the impact of the Bill, yet all the evidence suggests they are not.
“This isn’t about an increase in landlords wanting to evict tenants, it’s about landlords with legitimate reasons to take back their rental homes being able to do so in a timely manner.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
5 months ago | 1 comments
5 months ago | 14 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since August 2019 - Comments: 66
9:57 AM, 1st December 2025, About 5 months ago
In simple terms I bought my first buy to let as an investment as did many other landlords. It was hands off and managed by an agent with no revenue income but the possibility of capital growth. I believe that George Osbourne at the time could see no reason to give tax relief on pure investments. 25 years later I run my portfolio as a business with all that entails. Personally I can see no argument to apply a section 24 clause to businesses even if they are non trading. However, is it beyond the realms of possibility that the 20% tax credit is phased out over time?
Member Since August 2019 - Comments: 66
10:36 AM, 1st December 2025, About 5 months ago
Reply to the comment left by at 01/12/2025 – 09:57
Incorrectly posted. Should be under the post re section 24.