Inheriting Properties with Buy to Let Mortgages
My father recently passed away leaving 11 properties, all with mortgages with an average of around 85% remaining to pay. My siblings and I have little to no knowledge of this area. ![]()
A couple of the properties mortgages are up in 2016, which at that time, as understand it, will need to either be paid off or transferred into new ownership and new mortgages issued. The solicitor believes that the mortgages are likely to now be frozen for 6 months after which time you have around 2 years before the mortgage companies like to see the properties transferred into the beneficiaries names, new mortgages issued or sold and mortgages repaid. We are currently deciding whether we would like to keep them and earn an income from them or whether they should be sold. We’re all leaning towards keeping them, is there a chance we might be forced to sell by the mortgage company? Do you have any information you could provide on how this process works?
The lender obviously has the option to allow the beneficiaries to take on the loan, but how does this normally work – would they have to apply as you do normally for a mortgage? Is there a better way to do it? I presume the income from the individuals and the income from the properties would be taken into consideration, would it be better if there are more people jointly applying, or in this incidence does it not matter? There’s also the decision about whether we keep them jointly (possibley in a LTD company) or split them up between ourselves
Anyway, a lot of questions that we do not have the answers to at the moment.
If you have any experience in this area and are able to shed any light it would greatly appreciated.
Many thanks
David Pearson
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Buying an unregistered property with no deedsNext Article
6 months rent paid in advance refund
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 1434
3:33 PM, 2nd April 2015, About 11 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “Mark Alexander” at “01/04/2015 – 19:31“:
The advice makes sense either way. Advice was “get as high a valuation as possible whilst keeping estate value below IHT threshold”.
Member Since January 2011 - Comments: 12211 - Articles: 1406
3:48 PM, 2nd April 2015, About 11 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “Michael Barnes” at “02/04/2015 – 15:33“:
If the estate value is below the IHT threshold then I agree.
However, if the estate value is higher than the IHT threshold then a lower valuation would be far better. This is because IHT is currently 40 in the £1 whereas the maximum CGT is 28% and will only ever be payable if the asset is sold during the life of the beneficiary, i.e. it may never be payable and even if it is, at current rates it would be at least 12p in the £1 less.
.