Government U-turn as Warm Homes Plan sets EPC C deadline for 2030

Government U-turn as Warm Homes Plan sets EPC C deadline for 2030

EPC energy efficiency rating chart showing a home targeting EPC C by 2030 against a green landscape
9:16 AM, 22nd January 2026, 3 months ago 34
Categories:

The government has U-turned on its plans and scrapped the 2028 deadline for new tenancies to meet EPC C targets, though the cost cap has been reduced.

The government has published its Warm Homes Plan, which will require landlords to ensure their rental properties meet minimum energy-efficiency standards.

Energy Secretary Ed Miliband says the plan will “call time on landlords who don’t meet energy-efficiency standards” and all private rented properties will need to meet EPC C targets by October 2030.

However, the government has yet to clarify how it will work with landlords to achieve these standards, with industry experts warning energy efficiency upgrades will be costly for landlords.

All properties need to meet EPC C targets by October 2030

In a video on X, formerly Twitter, Mr Miliband said the Warm Homes Plan “will call time on private landlords who meet proper energy-efficiency standards.

“If you are a tenant, you deserve to live in a safe, affordable and warm home.”

The government has confirmed under the Warm Homes Plan, all private rented properties will need to meet EPC C targets by October 2030, unless the property has a valid exemption.

Under the plans, landlords will be able to choose between the smart or heat metrics, and the cap on the amount they are expected to invest to meet the new standards will be reduced from £15,000 to £10,000.

The cost cap will be lower where £10,000 would represent 10% or more of a property’s value.

Any spending on energy-efficiency works carried out since October last year will also count towards the planned cap, and the government will deliver a range of finance options, including Boiler Upgrade Scheme (BUS) grants.

Ben Beadle, chief executive of the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA), said: “We have long supported the need to improve the energy efficiency of the rental housing stock. However, the government’s initial proposals were simply unrealistic and had no hope of being delivered within the timescales originally set out.

“The government has clearly listened to our pragmatic proposals to improve its plans, and we look forward to working with it to ensure its ambitions work in practice.”

Proposals are deeply concerning for landlords

However, many industry experts warn that the Warm Homes Plan proposals are deeply concerning for landlords, due to a lack of clear and long-term funding commitments.

Timothy Douglas, head of policy and campaigns at Propertymark, said: “While the ambition of the Warm Homes Plan to improve energy efficiency and tackle fuel poverty is acknowledged, the proposals as they stand are deeply concerning for landlords and agents across both the residential and commercial sectors.

“In the private rented sector, landlords are being asked to deliver, in many cases, substantial and costly upgrades to reach EPC C by 2030, yet this is being imposed without clear, long-term funding commitments, realistic delivery timescales, or sufficient flexibility for older, complex, and hard-to-treat properties.

“A phased and realistic approach would allow landlords to maintain the Decent Homes Standard, manage costs effectively, and contribute meaningfully to the UK Government’s ambition to achieve net zero by 2050.”

A one-size-fits-all approach to energy efficiency will not work

Mr Douglas adds the government has given little details for how commercial landlords will meet EPC B targets by 2030

He said: “Crucially, there remains no clarity on Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards for non-domestic property, despite expectations that commercial landlords will be required to meet EPC B by 2030. The absence of detail on interim targets, exemptions, enforcement, and financial support makes it impossible for landlords to plan responsibly or invest with confidence.

“Propertymark has consistently warned that a one-size-fits-all approach to energy efficiency will not work. Without certainty, genuine flexibility, and practical financial support, there is a serious risk that both residential and commercial landlords will withdraw properties from the market.

“This would reduce supply, drive up costs for tenants and businesses, and ultimately undermine the government’s stated objectives on affordability, energy efficiency, and economic growth.”

Compliance deadline of 2030 for all tenancies is unrealistic

Rob Wall, assistant director (Sustainability), British Property Federation, welcomed the 2030 deadline for private rented properties but warned it is still unrealistic.

He said: “At last we have some clarity on the government’s plans for domestic EPC reform and for new minimum energy efficiency standards for the private rented sector.

“We still believe a compliance deadline of 2030 for all tenancies is unrealistic, but we welcome the proposed transitional measures and the recognition that more consultation is needed to understand how the new EPC regime will work in practice.

“However, the government’s Warm Homes Plan has left commercial buildings out in the cold. The failure to provide any clarity on future minimum energy efficiency standards for the non-domestic private rented sector will do little to arrest the growing sense that Ministers don’t understand or see the case for supporting commercial real estate in its transition to net zero.”

“Further delays to clarifying EPC targets for commercial buildings will have a significant impact on investment and the UK’s competitiveness. While clarity on changes for domestic property will be welcome, the absence of a clear strategy to support the decarbonisation of commercial buildings risks undermining the government’s ability to deliver net zero by 2050.”

Landlords need clear guidance

Landlord organisation iHowz say they welcome the clarity on the 2030 EPC deadline, but due to it being provided at such a late stage, iHowz will push for more generous financial incentives and support to ensure homes can be retrofitted before the 2030 deadline.

Rodney Townson from landlord organisation iHowz said: “It is difficult to assess how many landlords will view this as too onerous, as without sufficient Fabric First Measures, to ensure adequate insulation, many of these measures will not be suitable for flats or other properties without space for the new equipment.

“The Warm Homes Plan presents both challenges and opportunities for landlords, requiring significant investment to meet the upcoming EPC C standard by 2030. While mandatory upgrades add costs, the accompanying government grants through the Boiler Upgrade Scheme and Local Grants offer vital support to install heat pumps and improve insulation, ultimately reducing tenant bills and cutting carbon.

“Our focus must be on ensuring landlords have clear guidance, timely access to these funds, and support to navigate the new EPC regulations, turning this into a shared success for sustainable, affordable, and compliant renting.”


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since January 2025 - Comments: 57

    12:37 AM, 22nd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    So in other words it will never become law as Reform will win the next election and scrap it.

    Only problem being BTL mortgage lenders won’t lend on a D or below on a fixed deal that will go past the proposed date even if it isn’t law, my fixed deal expire summer of 2027 and I presume I won’t manage to get another 5 year fixed for a D

  • Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 317

    7:01 AM, 22nd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    The whole scheme is a duffer. I have Victorian properties so no chance of getting C without harming the the fabric of the building. Internal insulation on walls will not allow the property to ‘breath’ and cause damp and mould in a few years time.

    Even £10K spend is too much ie. You could spend it and still get a D so pointless. The current scheme allows you to get quotes and survey done that if the cost of the improvements do not potentially produce C then you could get exemption for 5 years so you did not need to fork out pointless money.

    NRLA welcome everything but do nothing to help us. Hopefully by 2029 this lot will be out otherwise I’m out.

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5

    9:39 AM, 22nd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    another inevitable U turn….

    The only things this constant drivel does is just add to the reasons why LL’s are leaving the sector. If just one rental at a D or E moves to private/FTB occupation, that’s one less property subject to this ‘EPC min C’ madness – because it simply falls out of the remit and is not counted.

    I suppose the figures could then be massaged to ‘prove’ that by 2029 (election year) there are less properties below the C – allowing Liebour to claim their intervention has ensured more private rentals now meet the min C, standards improved, lowered running costs for tenants and NZ achieved….

    What a load of tosh

  • Member Since October 2023 - Comments: 201

    9:43 AM, 22nd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Milibands statement – “If you are a tenant, you DESERVE to live in a safe, affordable and warm home” is very telling.

    In the past centuries, people had to WORK really hard to provide those things, now they deserve it, just by being born.

    Socialism. It means someone else is doing the providing for you.

  • Member Since August 2015 - Comments: 46

    9:45 AM, 22nd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Crouchender at 22/01/2026 – 07:01
    Not necessarily, i have two victorian properties one was an E rated on the EPC and i thought the same, however i chatted with the assessor prior to his inspection , put in a new boiler, ensured all lightbulbs and thermostatic heating controls and the loft insulation was at the max and got it up to a C. My other is a D and in need of a new EPC shortly so will do the same then. A decent assessor and some common sense is all that is required, solar panels , air source heat pumps ,floor and wall insulation are not advisable or practical affordable solutions for Victorian properties.

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5

    9:53 AM, 22nd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Crouchender at 22/01/2026 – 07:01
    the way this is going there are going to be more properties that come under the £100k valuation …..and so you might not need to meet the max £10k cap.

    The interesting things is you can count any work carried out to ‘improve’ the EPC from Oct 2025.

    So even if you only have say 1 year left on the current EPC and its currently a C, if the metrics are run again in 2027 to get you a new EPC and the rating is LOWER (because the latest methodology in mid 2025 focussed on prioritising electric), you can still count any of these ‘upgrade’ costs (ie you removed a gas boiler and put in a more expensive electric one) towards the total cap – yet the new EPC rating is now a D valid from 2027 – 2037!

  • Member Since February 2024 - Comments: 69

    12:15 PM, 22nd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    First of all, have ‘they’ decided on the ‘new’ elements that will decide into which band the property will be listed under for the ‘new’ EPC system? Have I missed something, but I think it’s still under review so how does anyone know what is going to count or not?

    Secondly, I still have one victorian property to sell because of the difficulty of increasing the EPC value, even though I don’t know what to do to improve it yet? That means 2 of mine which have already been bought by private homemakers, are no longer available for the PRS.
    When will ‘they’ who are in power at the moment really care about renters and increase the LHA rent allowances, which at the moment is a huge barrier against the homeless finding somewhere to rent?

  • Member Since May 2025 - Comments: 74

    2:48 PM, 22nd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Still zero tax relief on expenditure. It will be treated as capital gains relief at disposal.

    Council and social housing still doesn’t need to achieve E let alone C. Double standards.

    In my case the improvements have a break even if 50+ years – of course the tenant benefits from spend not me.

    Disaster. Hopefully a new government will scrap this madness.

  • Member Since January 2016 - Comments: 67

    3:50 PM, 22nd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Complete nonsense and madness that only increase rents for tenants, force landlords to sell up and do little for the environment.
    Sooner we get Red Ed and his bunch of Marxists out, the better. Hopefully, they’ll be long gone before 2030.
    As for Ben Beadle, I really don’t see how he and his NRLA organisation promote the interest of their landlord members.

  • Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5

    4:26 PM, 22nd January 2026, About 3 months ago

    Just looked up the huge ‘Plan’.

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/696f8a3ec0f4afaa9536a0c4/warm-homes-plan-standard-print.pdf

    Page 47 – “A high use electric storage heated household will save £442 through our actions to make electricity cheaper”

    So absolutely NOTHING to do with any benefits derived from a LL paying up to 10K for EPC upgrades required then eh Ed?

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles