7 months ago | 7 comments
The government has declined calls for a full review of the County Court system, despite the Commons Justice Committee condemning what it described as “a dysfunctional operation that has failed to adequately deliver civil justice across England and Wales.”
The Labour government has responded to the committee’s report, claiming a review is not needed, as they do not want a delay, but are taking “practical steps to improve the County Court system.”
The news comes after the government claimed the courts are ready to handle the Renters’ Rights Bill, though the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) warns of an “inevitable avalanche” of possession claims when the bill comes into force.
According to Ministry of Justice data, landlords face the longest wait for possession in over two years.
The average wait for a landlord in the second quarter of this year was 33.8 weeks – almost eight months, up from 32.5 weeks in the first quarter, marking the longest average wait since early 2022, when it peaked at 37.8 weeks.
The Commons Justice Committee report says the current levels of delay in the County Court system is “unacceptable.”
The report says: “Justice delayed is justice denied’ has never been more relevant to the work of the County Court: the current level of delays is unacceptable. Whilst we recognise the pandemic significantly contributed to the backlog in cases, the available data clearly shows it only exacerbated existing trends.
“The rising caseload, and increased delays were in motion before 2020, and post-pandemic there has been little by way of improvement.
“The County Court is a dysfunctional operation that has failed to adequately deliver civil justice across England and Wales. It is the ‘Cinderella service’ of the justice system.”
The Commons Justice Committee recommended a full, urgent, and comprehensive root-and-branch review of the County Court. However, the government says a full review is unnecessary and that it is working on improving the system.
The government says in the report: “Rather than focusing on a root-and-branch review of the County Court, the government is keen to focus on taking tangible and practical steps to improve the operation of the County Court, which will benefit everyday users, without further delay.
“We are already seeing these measures bear fruit with improvements to the timeliness of claims that got to trial, improving call waiting times, growth in small claims mediation, and further improvements to case management and file transfer systems.”
The government claims new digital services will provide support in accessing “swifter access to justice with reduced processing time” and “a new digital possession service for all possession claims in England and Wales.”
However, David Smith, property litigation partner at Spector Constant & Williams, says the government’s response to the report does not address the issues in the County Court system and warns that with the Renters’ Rights Bill approaching, the court system must be prepared:
He said: “The government’s response feels more like an effort to keep the lights on than a real attempt to fix deep-rooted issues in the civil justice system.
“While digitisation has its place, it cannot by itself address the fundamental resourcing and structural problems the County Court faces. With the Renters’ Rights Bill set to increase workloads further, there’s an urgent need for more decisive action to build confidence and ensure the system can cope with what’s coming.
“The legal profession will be watching closely to see whether the government’s current programme of reforms can deliver meaningful improvement, or whether, as many fear, a more comprehensive review will soon prove unavoidable.”
Timothy Douglas, head of policy and campaigns at Propertymark, tells Property118 that the government must do more to speed up the court system, warning that the Renters’ Rights Bill threatens to overwhelm it.
He said: “The House of Commons Justice Committee’s report highlights the growing pressures on the County Court system, pressures that will only intensify with the introduction of the Renters’ Rights Bill.
“Court delays are already impacting agents, landlords, and tenants, with possession claims and dispute resolution taking far too long. The Bill, while aiming to strengthen the rights of renters, risks overwhelming a justice system that is under-resourced and already operating at capacity.”
He adds: “Letting agents want to see the tenancy reforms matched with urgent investment in County Court infrastructure, particularly in staffing, digital case management, and regional capacity, as well as a greater use of High Court enforcement to help tackle delays. These are all issues Propertymark outlined in our written evidence to the Committee.
“As a matter of urgency, the UK government must put in place procedures to improve and speed up the court procedure for possession claims, and this should be achieved with consultation with service users such as private landlords, letting agents, and tenants.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Malicious vs Accidental Damage in Landlord Insurance
7 months ago | 7 comments
12 months ago | 6 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since February 2018 - Comments: 627
9:52 AM, 21st October 2025, About 6 months ago
The growing dysfunctionallity of the workings of the state isn’t an accident, it’s a plan and was written in a ‘progress report’ given at a conference in Basle in 1895, it is quite specific, it talks of ‘meddling with that which worked’ so that it no longer does, not a dead stop but rather like grit in a gear box or one broken tooth in a mechanical clock, what happens, ultimately chaos and again it talks of being ‘swept into the raging whirlpool of anarchy’ followed by the ‘Jack in a box’ appearance of the saviour, a false saviour of course, the wolf in sheep’s clothing.
Translated into Russian and then English (an original is in the British Museum) it has of course been marginalised, sidelined, and denigrated ever since.
Member Since January 2022 - Comments: 267
10:43 AM, 21st October 2025, About 6 months ago
What a negative way of managing this country? No wonder uk is going backwards if mediocrity is the new Standard to aim for!
I am now seriously thinking of selling my 5 remaining B2Ls as the support and thanks one receives is zero and the rules and regulations one needs to follow are more challenging and any wrong doing will be difficult to resolve quickly.
This will make the private rental sector even smaller.
Member Since October 2019 - Comments: 398
11:30 AM, 21st October 2025, About 6 months ago
Yet another trick, all engineered! The courts drag on for months ‘thus’ deferring homeless tenants to a later date, clever!
Member Since November 2022 - Comments: 67
11:37 AM, 21st October 2025, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by moneymanager at 21/10/2025 – 09:52
Agree, we are farmed like animals in a “system” that gives the illusion of justice. I just hope this ai thing slaps them in the face and they find they are pushed out of authority as it would do a much better job. So long as our god-given and civil rights are upheld by the algorithm.
Member Since February 2018 - Comments: 627
12:22 PM, 21st October 2025, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by howdidigethere at 21/10/2025 – 11:37
‘farmed like animals in a system’, careful now, referring to us as ‘cattle’, as some do, could see all manner of opprobrium heaped on your head, just for pointing out the truth
Member Since October 2025 - Comments: 1
12:23 PM, 21st October 2025, About 6 months ago
I am selling my remaining properties as the tenants move on. Currently, on one property in NW London , I am owed 10 month’s rent, £20,000. I have progressed a Section 8 in the fastest way allowed and I still do not have a Bailiff’s eviction date from either the County Court or the High Court. As an investment, residential rentals have become very high risk.
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1443 - Articles: 1
12:25 PM, 21st October 2025, About 6 months ago
The longer the backlog on s21 and s8 Possession Orders and the follow up Bailiffs Orders, Local Authorities wont have to assist with housing for months and months.
What is the stance re mortgage providers? Are they delaying repossessions too? Or don’t give a monkeys as since 1989 borrowers are liable for repayment.
Member Since March 2019 - Comments: 16
2:11 PM, 21st October 2025, About 6 months ago
Served Section 8 in January and waited forever for Bailiff’s eviction date which is finally happening tomorrow, so after 10 months and after a year of tenat being sponsored by myself via free roof over his head… And even after tomorrow I will need to keep his stuff for another 2 weeks instead of booking a direct trip to skip… This impotent system is a joke, but it’s more to cry than to laugh…
Member Since October 2024 - Comments: 194
4:17 PM, 21st October 2025, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by JeggNegg at 21/10/2025 – 10:43
Selling would work to reduce the rental stock if you sell to the owner/occupier.
I am in the process of conveyancing a sale to an owner/occupier. One less for the rental stock.
The other 4 to sale within the next 8 months with tenants to the investors. If this does not sale then may have to wait when properties are empty.
2 more in about 2 years when the fixed rate completes.
Member Since October 2024 - Comments: 194
4:22 PM, 21st October 2025, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Joanna at 21/10/2025 – 14:11
This government policy is teaching tenants not to be responsible or liable for anything at all.
It is the government ‘s task to train the tenants. “Right to rent” does not help sufficiently. Most tenants don’t read this guidelines or the tenancy agreement.
They are not responsible people and government wants us to moneycodle them.
Some sections of our society will never ever be responsible for their actions.
Parents or teachers are not allowed to reprimand young children.