2 months ago | 10 comments
The government has announced 1,000 new judges and tribunal members are being recruited to cope with increased demand following the Renters’ Rights Act.
In a letter to the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA), Courts Minister Sarah Sackman KC confirmed that the recruitment drive, alongside the courts’ digitisation process, would allow possession claims to be dealt with “swiftly and effectively”.
However, the NRLA warns that the “proof will be in the pudding” when it comes to court capacity.
The latest figures from the Ministry of Justice reveal that landlords issued 23,635 possession claims between April and June 2026, 6% more than the 22,352 claims issued during the same quarter in 2025.
Within that total, accelerated possession claims increased by 16% to 8,569.
Under the Renters’ Rights Act, Section 21 has been abolished, meaning landlords must now rely on one of 37 revised grounds for possession. If tenants then fail to leave the property within the notice period, or challenge the grounds for possession, the case will have to go through the courts.
NRLA chief executive Ben Beadle welcomed the government’s move to boost court capacity but warned that the “proof will be in the pudding” when it comes to whether the courts can cope with increased demand.
He said on the NRLA website: “While we are pleased the Minister is taking our concerns seriously and bolstering capacity in the courts and tribunals service, the proof will be in the pudding.
“Increasing the number of judges and tribunal members is a good start, but what is important to us is that landlords have confidence they can take back possession of their properties in a straightforward and timely manner where they have legitimate reason to do so, something that will depend entirely on how the process works in practice”.
Mr Beadle added: “We also need to know what is happening when it comes to the new body charged with dealing with challenges to proposed rent increases.
“With increasing numbers of tenants expected to do this under the new rules, we need a clear plan in place from the government to prevent the tribunal becoming overwhelmed.
“There also needs to be a clear mechanism by which it can monitor how well the courts are coping with the increased demand.
“We will continue to work closely with the courts and tribunals service to monitor the impact of the act, specifically with regards to wait times, and will remain in close dialogue with ministers and senior civil servants as the digital services are developed.”
In the letter, Ms Sackman confirmed that the court digitisation process would offer an online route for “making and responding to possession claims”, allowing landlords to file documents and receive updates and outcomes virtually.
The new system will replace the existing process, under which courts must process and issue claims using physical documents, increasing the risk of lost paperwork and delays. Ms Sackman said the new service would reduce the chance of mistakes being made.
She said the first stage of the changes will be rolled out by the end of the year, with the full digital rollout still on track for next year.
34 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Previous Article
Ground 4A: next summer's possession is decided this month
2 months ago | 10 comments
1 month ago | 30 comments
2 months ago | 1 comments
Member Since May 2019 - Comments: 127
8:38 AM, 22nd August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Fergus Wilson at 10:02
May be the reason one sees or encounters them on the golf course early afternoons,
Carchester
Member Since September 2023 - Comments: 123
9:07 AM, 22nd August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
The Ella Payne saga took five years to come to court!
If you let through a Letting Agent they will offer a “guaranteed rent” as a trading advantage.
This effectively means no Housing Benefit claimants and no Zero Hours Contract workers.
They will effectively be excluded by the Insurer which underwrites the Rent Guarantee.
It is morally wrong to accept an application costing up to £400 in fees for a “would be” tenant whom you know will be rejected by the underwriter.
What is the answer? Well, that is what we elected Andy Burnham for!
Oh yes, he as not elected but let us not split hairs!
Member Since August 2023 - Comments: 28
11:42 AM, 22nd August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
“Courts Minister Sarah Sackman KC confirmed the recruitment drive” Someone needs to tell the Ministry of Justice this? Their recruitment website this morning says “No current Vacancies”
Member Since September 2023 - Comments: 123
12:21 PM, 22nd August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Steve A at 22/08/2026 – 11:42
I think she was with the blues at the time but is now with the light blues,
If I remember correctly the reds would not allow Andy Burnham to be PM back n February but by July he was flavour of the month.
I do not belong to any political party and do not vote!
One of the vast majority!
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2515
12:48 PM, 22nd August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Fergus Wilson at 22/08/2026 – 12:21
I do not belong to any political party, I have never contributed to any political party (or to any political party leader whether before, during or after being in office) but I do always vote and I submit a postal vote to make sure that I always can, even if I”m travelling.
However, I didn’t vote labour: I also didn’t vote for Gordon Brown and I didn’t vote for Andy Burnham, but then nobody else did either.
Member Since May 2017 - Comments: 823
1:01 PM, 22nd August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Fergus Wilson at 22/08/2026 – 12:21
Why don’t you vote? I think the majority of people on here do vote – mainly to keep the Reds out
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2515
1:51 PM, 23rd August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by JB at 13:01
I do not know why he does not vote. Voting to keep the Reds out is fine but that is not why I vote. I am not a member of any political party and I do not care whether it is a labour government in power. What I care about is not having a labour government that has an overwhelming majority because then the left-wing extremists are not forced to moderate their policies and their legislation. This is how we end up with legislation as stupid as the Labour Renters Rights Act.
Member Since September 2023 - Comments: 123
2:43 PM, 23rd August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
The vast majority of the population do not vote! I am one of the great unwashed. I do not vote.
This forum should be A-political.
I am neither Right Wing nor Left Wing!
As to courtroom accommodation. I live in Kent. The county court at Dover was closed, the county court at Ashford was closed.
The problem appears to be a lack of judges.
The only answer is to jingle the coins!
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2515
10:07 AM, 24th August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
In the UK general election of 2024 voter turnout was 60%. (It had reached 72.2% in the 2016 Brexit referendum).
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1050929/voter-turnout-in-the-uk/
However, nobody voted for Andy Burnham in the 2024 election, washed or unwashed.
Member Since September 2023 - Comments: 123
10:51 AM, 24th August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Mr Burnham lives at
10 Downing Street, London WC1 2AA
Drop him a line. I am sure he will wish to communicate with you.
Always ask a question.
That way someone in the communications office will need to give it some thought.