1 month ago
Only four in 10 English social landlords reported full compliance with required gas safety checks in 2025/26, compared with 56.9% a year earlier.
Housemark’s early analysis of Tenant Satisfaction Measure (TSM) results put the latest figure at 41.7%.
That’s despite an increase in the proportion of tenants who said their home was safe.
The social landlord data firm also says that satisfaction with home safety rose from 78.4% to 79.3% during the year.
The firm’s chief data officer, Jonathan Cox, said: “These results provide encouraging evidence that investment in homes and core services is starting to translate into improved tenant satisfaction.
“Repairs performance is improving across the sector and we’re beginning to see the link between operational improvements and resident perception.”
He added: “However, the results also show that challenges remain.
Complaints volumes continue to rise and progress on communication and engagement measures is gradual.”
The findings are based on data from 223 registered providers managing 2.7 million homes, equivalent to 64% of England’s social housing stock.
The report provides an early indication of 2025/26 TSM performance before the Regulator of Social Housing publishes the national results later this year.
Overall tenant satisfaction increased from 72.6% to 74.2%.
Housemark estimates that between 50,000 and 100,000 tenants moved from being dissatisfied or neutral into one of the satisfied categories during the year.
Repairs recorded some of the largest increases in satisfaction with repairs rose from 73.6% to 76.2%.
Satisfaction with the time taken to complete work increased from 69.4% to 73.2%.
The proportion of tenants satisfied that their home was well maintained also rose, from 72.3% to 74.5%.
Repairs backlogs fell by 8% compared with the previous year as landlords directed more investment towards existing homes and core services.
Complaint numbers increased during the year, with the median rate for Stage 1 complaints rising by 11.6%.
Stage 2 complaint rates increased by 32.9%.
More than 94% of complaints were handled within target timescales.
Satisfaction with complaints handling increased to 37%, although it remained one of the lowest-scoring TSM measures.
Landlords’ handling of anti-social behaviour received a satisfaction score of 60.0%, which is largely unchanged from the previous year.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Council plans for a £1,050 selective landlord licenceNext Article
Landlords face £3.5bn HHSRS penalty exposure
1 month ago
9 months ago | 54 comments
Member Since August 2024 - Comments: 34
10:39 AM, 4th August 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Did these “social landlords” get fined for non compliance on gas certs ???
If not why not, another case of two tier keir and his mob.
Member Since June 2017 - Comments: 117
5:36 PM, 12th August 2026, About 2 weeks ago
In the private sector, we’d be hoisted from the financial gallows. Maybe social housing tenants are of lower importance to the government, so safety isn’t such an important consideration, So maybe yes, it could be a two tier system, in more ways than one possibly.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3713 - Articles: 5
3:16 PM, 13th August 2026, About 2 weeks ago
That’s despite an increase in the proportion of tenants who said their home was safe
Because social landlords don’t actually tell them what the legal standard is I expect. Shhhhhh.
Member Since June 2017 - Comments: 117
3:40 PM, 13th August 2026, About 2 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 13/08/2026 – 15:16
But the same standards should apply to all landlords. My tenants would never complain at not having to wait in for a gas engineer, but I still instigate the appointment. I can’t see why social housing landlords shouldn’t be held to the same standards & receive the same punishment, fines too.
If not, I can only assume that the wellbeing of social housing tenants is less important than PRS tenants, unless social housing providers are more worthy than we are, so bashing them just isn’t a thing.
One rule, surely?