10:20 AM, 11th November 2014, About 7 years ago 1
As non-professional Directors of freehold property management company, we accepted a condition of our purchase that we use “reasonable endeavours” to recover outstanding service charge debts on behalf of the administrators.
The outstanding debt remains with a professional leaseholder who countered this by taking us to the LVT for over-payment of service charges. On two occasions that company has been successful, and credits have been given to all leaseholders. However, at the 2nd LVT application the two sides cannot agree on what payments have already been made. Things were made more complicated by a changeover of property management company just before the first LVT.
As the Directors have not complied with the LVT decision, the claimant has now applied through the county court for implementation of the LVT decision. A large amount of money has been spent on legal and accountancy fees which has not been allowed from service charges. The Directors want to defend their position and bring to the County Court’s attention the fact that the claimant who is owed money is part of the original development company that accrued debt in the first place before going into administration.
The Directors need to find a cost effective solution as soon as possible. Their original Solicitors feel it is a case worth defending.
What do you think as a principle?
Can the County court be used as a place for appeal?
This time witnesses would be subpoenaed to substantiate the disputed payments.
Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.
Advice and implementation provided by a practising Barrister-At-Law with £10,000,000 of Professional Indemnity InsuranceBook Now
Next ArticleCan you sell a house within 6 months of purchase?
|“Account”||means an account required to access and/or use certain areas and features of Our Site;|
|“Cookie”||means a small text file placed on your computer or device by Our Site when you visit certain parts of Our Site and/or when you use certain features of Our Site. Details of the Cookies used by Our Site are set out in section 13, below;|
|“Cookie Law”||means the relevant parts of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003;|
|“personal data”||means any and all data that relates to an identifiable person who can be directly or indirectly identified from that data. In this case, it means personal data that you give to Us via Our Site. This definition shall, where applicable, incorporate the definitions provided in the EU Regulation 2016/679 – the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”); and|
|“We/Us/Our”||Means Property118 Ltd , a limited company registered in England under company number 10295964, whose registered address is 1st Floor, Woburn House, 84 St Benedicts Street, Norwich, NR2 4AB.|
|Name of Cookie||Purpose||Strictly Necessary|
|JSESSIONID||Used only to collect performance data, with any identifiable data obfuscated||No|
|__cfduid||This cookie is strictly necessary for Cloudflare's security features and cannot be turned off.||Yes|
|Name of Cookie||First / Third Party||Provider||Purpose|
|__utma, __utmb, __utmc, __utmt, __utmz||First||Helps to understand how their visitors engage with our website|
|_fbp||First||Helps to understand how their visitors engage with our website|