3 months ago | 14 comments
Just another day and another government hammer blow to private landlords. Confirmation that all private (and social) landlords must bring their properties up to the Decent Homes Standard (DHS) by 2035. Yes, it might only be a decade away and Generation Rent has called out the government for ‘dragging their feet’.
It insists that millions of renters will stay trapped in poor-quality homes but let’s flip the tired old script: for small private landlords, this isn’t a delay. It’s just one more item on a death-by-a-thousand-cuts list that’s already driving many of us out of the market.
Hot on the heels of the EPC C mandate by 2030 (as noted in the Warm Homes Plan), the DHS piles on requirements that sound reasonable until you tally the costs.
Homes must be in reasonable repair, free from serious hazards like untreated damp and mould, provide adequate thermal comfort and include child-resistant window restrictors.
Landlords must ensure basics like a properly laid-out kitchen (which will be less than 20 years old), bathroom (less than 30 years old) and protection from external noise.
Fail to fix the damp? That’s a non-decent property. Fail any category? That’s potential enforcement action with a hefty fine.
Leaving aside the fact that most landlords offer quality homes and would be mortified if they were accused otherwise, my concern is that private landlords are being held to a higher standard than homeowners.
For example, mine, and I’m guessing your children survived without child-resistant restrictors on every window.
So why focus on private and social landlords for this?
But 2035 feels distant compared to the real PRS killer: the Renters’ Rights Act kicking in from 1 May 2026.
Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions will be gone. Fixed term assured shorthold tenancies will be abolished.
Joint-and-several contracts with sharers? One leaves, the contract fractures so good luck replacing someone easily.
Your old agreements become void, replaced by a system stacked against you.
Then come the penalties: civil fines up to £40,000 (or even £7,000 per breach in some cases) for failing compliance on a growing list of ‘must-dos’ and ‘must-nots’.
Crikey, give the council officer a sly glance and you’ll be paying up.
The Act is money-spinner designed to cripple small landlords.
I’m fed up with being portrayed in this way without acknowledging that some tenants contribute to the home’s squalor through their own neglect.
And don’t get me started on the state of council and social housing.
Now there’s a ticking expensive bomb that taxpayers will have to foot to meet the Decent Homes Standard.
This isn’t about decency; it’s discrimination wrapped in virtue-signalling.
Small landlords, those are the traditional ones who built portfolios over decades, providing the bulk of rental stock, now face being robbed blind before retirement.
Mind you, Labour are making a good fist of abusing us while alive and setting up for asset grabs after death.
By 2035, will any small landlords remain in the PRS? I think it’s doubtful.
We’re going the same way as small shopkeepers, once the backbone of what was a great nation.
Most of us will be gone by 2030, forced out by EPC upgrades, DHS works, impossible compliance and the risk of massive fines or tribunal losses.
Rental properties will sit empty or shift to corporate hands, rents will rise to cover it all, and supply will shrink.
Labour is effectively worsening the housing crisis it’s claiming to fix.
Generation Rent can complain about 2035 being too far away all they want but for those of us still here, it feels like a date chosen because by then the argument will be moot.
The traditional landlord will be gone. Retired, sold up, bankrupted or simply exhausted.
Standards matter. Decent homes matter; we get that. It’s what we are proud to offer.
But decency also includes fairness, proportionality and honesty.
Instead, what we have now is more punishment dressed up as policy.
By all means, ask for better homes but don’t pretend this is not also about who is allowed to provide them.
Until next time,
The Landlord Crusader
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
3 months ago | 14 comments
3 months ago | 13 comments
3 months ago | 34 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since January 2025 - Comments: 57
12:41 PM, 30th January 2026, About 3 months ago
I believe the age limit will be removed under the new DHS.
The new DHS will not be the same as the current DHS that applies to social housing
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 281
12:50 PM, 30th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Nobody is going to be telling me about the age of kitchens and bathrooms in rental property when I choose to retain a lovely 1948 bathroom in my Victorian home and my second home, a 1988 built flat retains its 1988 oak kitchen which I have no plans to replace.
The decent homes standard was introduced to help guilde local authorities in implementing bulk improvement programmes twenty five years ago – before the days of EPCs when many would have had back boiler CH ( only 60 odd % efficient ) or perhaps even none at all and kitchens perhaps dating back to the late 1960s. Also bearing in mind many post war council houses were built at scale, quickly and down to a budget in an era when material shortages lasted until well into the 1950s.
Only a bunch of dreamers with no practical experience of anything could twenty five years on, against a back drop af a minimum EPC of C anyway, think this is a sensible approach to individual properties operated by small scale landlords – often in properties where tenants are happy with their homes, their rent and their landlord and don’t want disruption of major refitting.
The punchline is – which class of landlords generally don’t even carpet or decorate properties for their incoming tenants – local authority / housing associations or us as private landlords?
I’m nearly out now so 2035 doesn’t bother me but the principle will further disadvantage more tenants (or those who cannot even find a tenancy unless they want or are affluent enough to sign up for a built to rent with Lloyds Bank, BlackRock etc).
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 781
2:57 PM, 30th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Is there even a definition of ‘protection against external noise’ will this be another assessment requirement???
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1587
8:16 PM, 30th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Read the new guide. No arbitrary age limits on kitchens and bathrooms.
We shouldn’t be letting indecent homes.
Member Since January 2025 - Comments: 57
8:33 PM, 30th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 20:16
There were no arbitrary age limits. Under the current DHS, something had to be both older than the age limit AND in disrepair.
If passed the age limit but in good repair than it does not fail and if in disrepair but within age limit then again it does not fail the current DHS.
Under the proposed new DHS, if it is in disrepair then is will automatically fail, regardless of age, so in fact in will be a stricter rule.
Member Since January 2025 - Comments: 57
8:41 PM, 30th January 2026, About 3 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 30/01/2026 – 20:16
My main concern is if tenants brings something into disrepair that means it fails the DHS
I’ve done work for letting agents for near 20 years, tenants ruin things, you try to claim from the deposit and yet the DPS say an electric hob has a life expectancy of 5 years so you can’t claim anything for the smashed hob, when we all know hobs last longer than 5 years
I can see many a scenario where tenants trash the property, the powers that be deem it’s not the tenants fault as the they think the items are past their natural shelf life, and then say the landlord has failed the DHS
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 204
6:16 PM, 1st February 2026, About 3 months ago
By 2035 I will be too old to want to hold any more rental houses, so will hopefully be selling them off. to save me giving 40% inheritance tax to the government.
Any repairs needed on my houses are dealt with as quickly as possible and I’ve never had any bad reports from tenants who have left.
Gen Rant and Shelter along with the government are going to be the cause of making people homeless. I’ve no idea where they think people who can not afford a mortgage are going to live once PRS landlords sell up.
Poor quality houses are going to seem a luxury over living in a tent.
Over the next few years more and more landlords will sell up, especially the ones in inner cities where houses are cheap but will never meet the EPC C.
Currently my rents are way below market rates and I should probably increase them. I’ve never had a tenant complain about the quality of the house