10 months ago | 3 comments
The Housing Minister has confirmed councils should not profit from selective licensing fees, despite a council landing itself in hot water over mishandling of fees.
Matthew Pennycook has warned councils “not to use selective licensing fees to fund other local authority services,” emphasising that fees must be ringfenced for running the schemes alone.
However, a previous report by Property118, reveals Nottingham City Council spent millions of pounds on selective licensing and failed to ringfence the scheme.
In a written question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, Shadow Housing Secretary Kevin Hollinrake asked: “Whether revenues from selective licensing charges on private rented sector landlords (a) are ringfenced and (b) can be applied to the general revenue account; and whether councils can charge above cost recovery.”
In response, Mr Pennycook confirmed councils should not profit from selective licensing fees.
He said: “Selective licensing fees paid by landlords to local authorities should only be used to cover the costs of running schemes.
“Local authorities are not expected to profit from licensing, nor should they use licensing revenues to fund other local authority services.”
Despite Mr Pennycook’s warning, Nottingham City Council had failed to properly ringfence selective licensing fees for years, and only began doing so in 2024.
Previously, Property118 reported, the council published a report by accounting firm Ernst and Young (EY) who accused the council of “inappropriate financial activity”.
The damning report revealed selective licensing fees were only properly ringfenced in 2024.
The report revealed one of the main sources of licensing income for the council is selective licensing.
According to its annual expenditure report, the council spent a whopping £4.2 million on selective licensing between 2020/1 and another £2.8 million in 2021/22.
The council in a statement claimed the report: “It is important to be clear there is nothing specifically identified within the samples tested in the assessment that suggests any allocated funds have been misspent or funding has not been used for its overall intended purpose.
“The council has been open about the nature and seriousness of the assessment’s findings.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Paragon Bank celebrates 30 years of pioneering landlord mortgagesNext Article
Unintended benefit of removing s21?
10 months ago | 3 comments
10 months ago | 5 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 1013
6:15 PM, 21st July 2025, About 9 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Neil P at 21/07/2025 – 18:05One of many creative accounting ploys to shift costs into the selective licensing pot.
Member Since May 2023 - Comments: 225
8:55 AM, 14th August 2025, About 8 months ago
SL is a government scam to make tenants pay for councils housing responsibilities that central government does not want to fund.