9 months ago | 44 comments
Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy prime minister and housing secretary, has sparked controversy after purchasing a three-bedroom seaside flat in Hove for £800,000.
Newspapers report that the acquisition, made earlier this year, adds to her property portfolio, which already includes a constituency home in Ashton-under-Lyne, valued at £650,000, and access to a grace-and-favour apartment in Westminster’s Admiralty House.
The purchase has drawn sharp criticism from Conservative MPs, who accuse her of hypocrisy given Labour’s recent push to impose higher taxes on second home ownership.
Tory critics, including shadow housing secretary James Cleverly, have raised ‘glaring questions’ about Rayner’s living arrangements, particularly as Labour supports policies like the second-home council tax premium, which doubles the tax on properties not used as primary residences.
This policy, implemented in April, means Rayner’s Hove flat incurs an annual council tax bill of £5,000, which a source close to her confirmed she pays in full.
However, Mr Cleverly questioned whether she has been transparent about paying the same premium on her Admiralty House apartment or if she claims a single-person discount on her constituency home, which could reduce its council tax to £3,682.
Sources close to Rayner defended the purchase and told newspapers that the Hove flat is necessary for her work across several locations, including Westminster, which is more than 50 miles away.
They clarified that the property, bought with a mortgage in May, will not be rented out or used as a holiday let, meaning it is likely to remain empty for at least six months each year. The sources also confirmed that Ms Rayner’s primary residence is her Ashton-under-Lyne home.
This isn’t the first time Ms Rayner’s property purchases have hit the headlines.
She was previously dubbed ‘Two Homes Rayner’ for managing two right-to-buy council properties during her marriage.
Ms Rayner also faced accusations of hypocrisy over her use of the Right-to-Buy scheme, which she later defended proudly.
A recent biography by Lord Ashcroft revealed she made a £48,500 profit selling her former Stockport council house, purchased at a 25% discount in 2007.
The fresh revelations about her Hove flat have reignited Tory demands for clarity on her tax arrangements, with Cleverly saying: “For months, she has dodged correspondence and evaded parliamentary questions. Only now, under pressure, has she been forced to set out part of the picture.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Can UK Landlords survive the ongoing tax raid?
9 months ago | 44 comments
11 months ago | 8 comments
1 year ago | 59 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since January 2022 - Comments: 267
9:32 AM, 27th August 2025, About 8 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Tim Rogers at 26/08/2025 – 15:02
Great comment
I am glad I am not her mortgage lender.
Member Since March 2020 - Comments: 2
9:27 AM, 30th August 2025, About 7 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Keith Wellburn at 27/08/2025 – 08:35
Let’s call it what it is… Punishment Tax
Member Since September 2021 - Comments: 104
10:35 PM, 30th August 2025, About 7 months ago
HMRC have some rules about tax avoidence.
Strict UK anti-avoidance rules, and improper use can lead to significant tax consequences and fines. If there is any justice in this 2 tier Starmer govenment, she should be investigated for tax avoidance, i would have thought, but she is the deputy PM, so it will all be brushed under the carpet, no doubt.
The Commies are all hypocrites, if they are anything!
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5
11:59 AM, 31st August 2025, About 7 months ago
hypocrisy not illegal and a totally meaningless form of embarrassment for this current lot who have no moral compass whatsoever.
It seems she has clearly tried to purposely ‘manoeuvre things around’ so the tax bill is reduced BUT if she has actually lied in the process to get to that outcome, then that is a different matter.
Seems to me that she now has to be clear about her EXACT living arrangements now whether she likes it or not as the fact that taxpayers money is funding the ‘grace and favour’ accommodation, because if nothing else there is also a CT question to clarify. Looks to me like she’s trying to have it every which way in her favour… and the reality is you can’t