10 months ago | 21 comments
Angela Rayner has rejected calls to unfreeze the local housing allowance (LHA) arguing that increasing LHA rates would simply funnel more money to landlords.
In a Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee (HCLG) session on the spending review, Housing Secretary Angela Rayner rejected calls to unfreeze the Local Housing Allowance, emphasising that the solution was to “not give money to private landlords” and focus instead on building more homes.
Ms Rayner also accused landlords of evicting families without excuse, then hiking rents and putting someone else in their place.
Florence Eshalomi, chair of the HCLG, questioned Ms Rayner over the government’s stance on the Local Housing Allowance and said the freeze was pushing families into poverty. She asked whether a case was being made to review the allowance.
The Conservative government announced an end to the four-year freeze to LHA rates in 2023; however, the Labour government froze the LHA rates again during the Budget last year.
Ms Rayner swerved Ms Eshalomi’s question and claimed the government is working to alleviate the pressures on homelessness, adding that it is spending £34 billion per year on housing support, including £12 billion in the private rented sector.
However, Ms Rayner blamed landlords for benefiting from Local Housing Allowance payments.
She told the committee: “In the longer term, the only way we are going to fix this crisis is not by giving more money to private landlords for people who should be in social housing; we need to have a social housing revolution.
“That is why I have been so bold as to push for the biggest increase in the Affordable Homes Programme, alongside the rent convergence.”
Ms Eshalomi then fired back at Ms Rayner and asked: “Whether the local housing allowance freeze is a political choice by the government to push children into poverty.”
Ms Rayner again talked about the government’s funding commitment to housing support, but then repeated that private landlords were to blame.
She said: “We are investing by putting money into local housing allowance, but the truth is that the way to fix the problem is not by having significant rent increases under private landlords who put social tenants in private accommodation.
“The way to fix the problem is to have more social housing for people who desperately need it.”
Ms Eshalomi pointed out that even the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) has spoken of the impact of the local housing allowance. The NRLA has extensively campaigned to restore the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rates to the 30th percentile of local market rents.
Ms Rayner argued the government was building 1.5 million homes to tackle the crisis, but Ms Eshalomi said: “We can’t build homes fast enough. In the interim, they are renting in the private rented sector, but a lot of them are not able to rent locally because of the freeze on the local housing allowance.”
Ms Rayner again did not answer the question and, once again, blamed landlords, saying: “Again, on top of that, we have the Renters’ Rights Bill, with its protections, and the extra money we set aside for homelessness prevention.
“Local councils can look at some of that for ways to prevent homelessness and at section 21 no-fault evictions, along with other challenges that families face that lead them into homelessness in the first place.
“We have seen landlords evict families, with no excuse, and then ramp up the rent and put somebody in. That is because the housing market is in such a dire situation. We have taken measures to try to prevent some of those egregious practices, as the same time as building the homes that we need.”
Despite Ms Rayner’s claim landlords evict for no reason, the English Housing Survey Private Rented Sector report for 2021-2022 reveals that the majority of renters (77%) ended their last tenancy because they wanted to move, not because of eviction.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
CHL and Leeds BS unveil new BTL deals
10 months ago | 21 comments
11 months ago | 14 comments
1 year ago | 59 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5
12:08 PM, 15th July 2025, About 9 months ago
Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 13/07/2025 – 11:49
you don’t rent to benefit tenants. Everyone happy!
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2188 - Articles: 2
12:30 PM, 15th July 2025, About 9 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 15/07/2025 – 12:08
That means I have to discriminate against benefit tenants, which I am quite happy to do as they are a pain in the backside, but it is illegal under the RRB.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1999
12:33 PM, 15th July 2025, About 9 months ago
Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 15/07/2025 – 12:30
I don’t have to discriminate against benefits tenants: My agent just screens them out because there are always plenty of other tenants ahead of them in the queue that satisfy the affordability criteria and incur less risk.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5
10:20 AM, 16th July 2025, About 9 months ago
Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 15/07/2025 – 12:30YOU don’t discriminate. You work within the parameters of what the state have determined they will pay towards a tenants accommodation. It is deemed unaffordable on that basis.