2 months ago | 1 comments
The Prime Minister has warned landlords who rent out the “worst-quality homes” will be given warnings and could ultimately face having their properties taken over by councils.
Speaking at the Labour Party conference, Andy Burnham also said he would reform Right to Buy and tackle the empty homes crisis.
The comments come as the government announces plans to strengthen leaseholders’ rights, including tighter regulation of property agents and a cap on fees.
Mr Burnham claimed that too many homes in the private rented sector are in a poor state of repair.
Addressing the Labour Party conference, Mr Burnham said: “You will find rented homes in a poor state of repair on so many British streets. Homes which harm the health of the people living inside them and drag down the streets around them.
“The worst of it is often owned by absent landlords, who are paid through the benefits system but refuse to reinvest in the upkeep of their properties.
“It is time to call an end to this. Landlords who rent out the worst-quality homes will be given warnings to improve them. If they refuse, we will make it much easier for councils to acquire those homes, and we will legislate if necessary.”
Mr Burnham added: “We don’t let people sell food that damages people’s health, so why should we allow it with homes? From now on, we won’t. This is what I mean by taking back control with our communities.”
Mr Burnham added that the government would reform Right to Buy and launch a council housebuilding revolution.
He said: “I am specific about council homes because we need to restore stronger democratic control over our housing stock.
“We will help councils build again and make it affordable by building on unused public land. We will reform Right to Buy, not taking the right away from anyone in an existing home, but removing it from the new homes we build, so they are there for generations to come.”
The news comes as the government have announced councils in England will be able to take control of homes left empty for six months under government plans to cut the current two-year threshold.
Councils will also no longer need to provide evidence relating to anti-social behaviour or community support when seeking an order through the Residential Property Tribunal.
Timothy Douglas, head of policy and campaigns at Propertymark, said further clarity is needed on how the proposals would work in practice.
He said: “Addressing poorly maintained properties should remain a key concern, with local authorities across England working closely with residents, landlords and property agents to understand why properties may fall below the required standard.
“Every case will have different circumstances, so any proposals must be proportionate and recognise the individual circumstances of the property and those living in it.
“Further clarity is needed on how the proposals would work in practice, including carrying out remedial work with a tenant in situ, the responsibilities of different parties, and how properties would be managed if they passed into local authority control or ownership.
“With the new ‘Register Your Rental Property Service’ being implemented for landlords from December, councils will have greater access to information to support targeted, intelligence-led enforcement. The focus should be on making better use of existing tools rather than simply adding another layer of legislation and potentially damaging relationships between good landlords and government.
“Any new proposals should deliver a fair, proportionate and tailored approach that achieves sustainable, long-term outcomes.”
43 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Previous Article
Property sales fall as house price growth slows
2 months ago | 1 comments
2 months ago | 11 comments
2 months ago | 22 comments
Member Since August 2014 - Comments: 184
5:17 PM, 18th October 2026, About 4 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 15:16
I absolutely agree that corporate landlords are taking over the PRS. There may be bumps on the road, due to government incompetence, but i firmly believe that is the plan as everything the government has done since 2015 points in that direction. Tenants who gloat at stitching up their independent landlord are going to wake up one day to find they cannot rent anything as the monopoly corporate landlords demand an impeccable credit history, a well paid steady job and perfect references from all involved, otherwise they will be sleeping in a cardboard box at the bottom of the lake (ref the Four Yorkshiremen) and will wish Rigsby was their landlord.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 32
10:34 AM, 19th October 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Bristol Landlord at 02:46
Sadly that is happening and will end with the lost of our properties and there will be more tenants without a home if we leave our luck to NRLA and that is why we must use any chances like property118 and others offers us in these spaces.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2587
10:43 AM, 19th October 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Bristol Landlord at 18/10/2026 – 17:05
Yes, George Osborne (conservative) probably fired the first big shot.
But as for a soviet-style takeover (the Chinese have done the same in the past) we already almost have that with the bits of labour’s Renters Rights Act that say you can’t discriminate against tenants on benefits or tenants with children because there are big fines if you do. Although it’s unlikely that a Labour and/or Green Party dominated government would do this a government could fix this problem by making it clear in law that landlords are not responsible for assessing whether tenants are on benefits or not so that the housing benefits people could not come and get the money back from you as the landlord. I used to take benefits tenants years ago and had no particular problem with housing benefits tenants apart from for this risk. And all the tenants that I have ever housed have had children. But Labour’s Renters Rights Act makes tenants on benefits and tenants with children even more risky than they were before the Act. Their Act makes things worse and they were told that it would make things worse.