1 month ago | 14 comments
The government has claimed that tribunal-determined rents will protect tenants from falling into rent arrears.
In a Parliamentary written question, Independent MP Iqbal Mohamed asked whether landlords should be required to notify councils and the Department for Work and Pensions when a First-tier Tribunal finds a tenant has been overcharged rent.
The government has announced a £47 fee for tenants challenging a rent increase through the first-tier property tribunal.
In response to Mr Mohamed’s question, housing minister Matthew Pennycook claimed mechanisms are in place to support tenants.
He said: “Where a tenant challenges a proposed rent increase at the Tribunal, any rent increase will be payable only from the start of the next rent period following the date of the Tribunal’s determination.
“This means that, in such circumstances, if the Tribunal determines a rent level below what the landlord proposed, the landlord will not have received any rent above the level determined by the Tribunal. This is intended to protect tenants from falling into rent arrears.”
However, as previously reported by Property118, critics argue the same mechanism could encourage tenants to challenge rent increases simply to delay higher payments.
The mechanism would mean that even unsuccessful challenges could delay higher rent payments for months, leaving landlords in limbo.
Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and head of civil justice in England and Wales, warned the Housing Law Practitioners’ Association that the rules under the Renters’ Rights Act could create “an incentive for tenants to apply to the First Tier Tribunal in respect of every increase in order to delay its implementation”.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
1 month ago | 14 comments
2 months ago | 17 comments
2 months ago | 53 comments
Member Since November 2025 - Comments: 2
8:45 AM, 29th June 2026, About 2 hours ago
Unfortunately, this is going to incentivise me to set the rents as high as I legally can to offset the losses arising from this farce.
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 869
8:47 AM, 29th June 2026, About 2 hours ago
The tribunal was designed to protect tenants from excessive rents – the message here is that they want to suppress rents to a mythical ‘affordable’ level and not market rent.
Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1243
9:40 AM, 29th June 2026, About 48 minutes ago
Reply to the comment left by Simon Kinzley at 29/06/2026 – 08:45
…or use the same rules to the landlords advantage. Set the initial rent above open market level on the basis that if and when the tenant challenges it at the Tribunal, it will take months to get a determination and any lower rent will only apply from that point. I’m not aware of any penalty or costs to the landlord of doing this. Of course if landlords start gaming the system en-masse, Gov’t will be quick to close the loophole.
Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 160
10:18 AM, 29th June 2026, About 9 minutes ago
there are so many variables in determining what is the true market value of a seemingly homogenous item. one two bed flat in a post code can be worth a lot more or less than another. Parking for example is a plus, more efficient heating, decor of common parts, decor of flat. How will tribunal cope with visiting so many flats?