1 year ago | 11 comments
A charity has urged the government to reverse the freeze on the Local Housing Allowance (LHA) to support low-income renters.
The Salvation Army claimed in a poll of 1,000 adults, nearly half (48%) fear an extra £100 expense would leave them unable to pay their rent or mortgage.
The charity has also called for the government to address the shortage of social homes.
The Conservative government announced an end to the four-year freeze to LHA rates in 2023; however, the Labour government froze the LHA rates again during the Budget last year.
Previously, Housing Secretary Angela Rayner, rejected calls to unfreeze LHA, emphasising that the solution was to “not give money to private landlords” and focus instead on building more homes.
However, The Salvation Army claimed the freezing of LHA means it “does not reflect the true cost of renting in today’s market”, where they claim rents have soared on average by 7.7% in the UK in the last year.
A poll by the charity 48% of adults fear an extra £100 expense would leave them unable to pay their rent or mortgage.
The Salvation Army’s Captain John Clifton said: “When nearly half of people are so financially fragile that they are living in fear of a £100 bill, something has gone very wrong, and the government must take notice.
“There are already over a hundred thousand people in the UK without a proper home. To protect people who are struggling financially, we urge the government to unfreeze housing benefit or risk pushing thousands more over the cliff edge into homelessness.”
The Salvation Army has urged the government to lift the freeze on LHA rates, which they say “would help people claiming Universal Credit or housing benefit afford at least three in every ten of the most affordable properties in their area”.
The Salvation Army has also urged the Department of Work and Pensions to remove the five-week wait for the first Universal Credit payment for new claimants.
The charity has also asked the government to tackle the shortage of affordable housing.
The charity said: “The UK government must address the shortage of affordable housing, especially social housing, so that people on low incomes who are trapped in unsuitable, temporary accommodation can afford a stable home.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
1 year ago | 11 comments
1 year ago | 1 comments
1 year ago | 3 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2197 - Articles: 2
11:02 AM, 19th August 2025, About 8 months ago
When Angela Rayner started talking about private landlords taking money from the public purse I realised just how bad this was and resolved not to be one of the errant landlords. All my government funded tenants are gradually being evicted and no longer will I take anyone who cannot pay the rent from their earned income. I do not wish to remain one of the scrounging landlords funded from the public purse and would urge others to follow suit.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3528 - Articles: 5
2:08 PM, 19th August 2025, About 8 months ago
Low income or ‘no earned income’?
Housing associations/shared ownership options are perfect for low income, and social housing for those reliant on benefits.
The private sector is one which is based on affordability. If you can’t its never going to be an option.
With the government going hell to leather on pushing for increasing standards in the PRS (and therefore increasing costs), the bar is going to be raised, and even more will be locked out of gaining private accommodation – ironically all at the governments behest and ultimate cost.