1 year ago | 2 comments
A landlord has won a rare tribunal hearing and escaped being hit with a £29,000 rent repayment order (RRO).
It comes after tenants launched an unsuccessful challenge with support from Justice for Tenants, a tenant advocacy and advice service.
The ruling at the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber), dismissed the tenants’ accusations entirely.
The tribunal highlighted administrative blunders by the London Borough of Southwark as the root cause of the dispute.
The landlord, backed by Des Taylor, the co-founder of Landlord Licensing & Defence, faced the tenants’ allegations despite having met all legal requirements.
Evidence showed he had submitted an HMO licence application and payment in December 2018.
Southwark Council mismanaged this as the paperwork was never properly logged, leaving the landlord vulnerable to tenant claims.
When challenged, the council’s licensing team admitted he had, in fact, complied.
Speaking after the ruling, Mr Taylor said: “This was an appalling case of a landlord being dragged through a legal process for something they had already complied with.
“Had it not been for our forensic case preparation and the ability to demonstrate Southwark’s failures, this landlord could have suffered an unjust financial penalty.”
He added: “The tribunal’s ruling makes it clear that the allegations were entirely without merit.”
Undeterred by the council’s clarification, Mr Taylor says the tenants pressed ahead with legal action, leaning on flawed council data.
The tribunal uncovered numerous discrepancies in their arguments, describing their grievances as trivial and poorly supported.
Allegations of substandard property conditions were deemed overstated, and their licensing complaints collapsed following Southwark’s own admissions.
Consequently, the landlord avoided a hefty RRO financial penalty.
Mr Taylor says the case exposes the perils landlords face when local authorities fail in their duties, sparking unwarranted legal fights.
It also emphasises the value of skilled advocacy in navigating RRO disputes.
Landlord Licensing & Defence has a track record of more than 450 cases, including a landmark win that has shaped legal rulings more than 1,000 times.
He warns that councils, stretched thin by limited resources, often direct tenants to groups like Justice for Tenants, inadvertently fuelling RRO applications.
This then turns local authorities into unwitting promoters of tenant claims, heightening risks for landlords and underscoring the need for expert protection.
The tribunal voiced its dismay at Southwark Council’s contradictory records, which misled the tenants into pursuing their claim.
It also refused to award the tenants any costs, cementing the fragility of their position.
Mr Taylor is now urging that landlords access a professional consultation when it comes to legal action involving RROs rather than having direct engagement with claimants.
He adds that understanding key evidence can make or break a defence.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Next Article
Councils reap £327m from landlord licensing fees
1 year ago | 2 comments
1 year ago | 14 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since November 2017 - Comments: 261
1:54 PM, 17th March 2025, About 1 year ago
It’s good that for once reason prevailed.
Out of interest, is this a situation where costs are awarded? If so, who would bear them, the council for their failings or those who instigated the legal action? If the later, then would that include the ‘Justice for Tenants’ who evidently misadvised.
Member Since October 2024 - Comments: 49
2:11 PM, 17th March 2025, About 1 year ago
Councils are 80% overmanned,top heavy and incompetently run by economic illiterates.
What seems to be forgotten in all of this is opportunity cost and the value of a landlord’s time.
Landlords are businesspeople and have other things to do and may well have other business interests that they need to work on.
If they are stuck in a Tribunal they are losing time and money which is not compensated for.
The best thing small landlords can do is sell up move into better investments and put troublesome tenants to the sword…they are not Social Workers or people of the cloth or ” God botherers”.
Member Since April 2023 - Comments: 88
10:03 AM, 22nd March 2025, About 1 year ago
Firstly congratulations to Mr Taylor on exposing this disgraceful practice by Southwark Council which they shamelessly referred to as an ‘administrative error’!
It is NOT an ‘error’ but an example of the culture of maladministration and oftentimes malfeasance prevalent in Southwark council and I would argue, most local authorities in their statutory housing options/ homeless service provision.
I say this as one who has challenged Southwark a number of times over their abrogation of the Homeless Reduction Act 2017 and also from the context of years of experience of working in numerous local authorities housing options and homeless teams.
I ceased working in local authorities because quite frankly the culture of arrogance, discrimination and maladministration was a putrid stench I could not stomach and was exhausted in trying to cleanse.
I now volunteer as an independent housing adviser to prs landlords and tenants to ensure both are fully aware of their respective statutory tenancy responsibilities and to help mediate with issues.
I would wholeheartedly support a landlord organization that sought to scrutinize local authorities administration of their statutory housing duties as it is beyond disgraceful that too many of these PUBLIC AUTHORITIES are getting away with maladministration and sometimes malfeasance, with little or no penalties!
This exposé of Southwark Council’s ‘administrative error ‘ is the tip of the iceberg!…