Jacob Rees-Mogg recognises damage done by the Treasury
It is now clear that the Treasury, under George Osborne’s stewardship, made some catastrophically bad decisions with the twin aims of courting popular opinion by appearing to go for the ‘nobs’ and also of raising money towards his manic deficit reduction quest.
As part of this he imposed a large extra burden of stamp duty at the top of the market. This is now being shown to have failed abysmally.![]()
The Times has just reported:
‘Jacob Rees-Mogg, Conservative MP for North East Somerset, said the high rate was costing the Treasury “hundreds of millions”. “This has damaging knock-on effects on a range of businesses and no beneficiaries,” he said.’
I believe we should take advantage of Jacob Rees-Mogg’s interest in this and get his attention firmly fixed on Section 24. He has a strong public profile and could be a powerful ally.
I am urging everyone who reads this to send Jacob an email outlining the effects that are and will be caused by Section 24. This is the address that can be used >> [email protected]
I suggest you send him a link to my report >> https://www.property118.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/6G0YKMd1Wf.pdf
Also make one or two points in the email to grab his attention, bearing in mind that shorter emails are more likely to be read.
You might also want to send one to Andrew Tyrie on the Treasury Select Committee as he also strikes me as too intelligent and hopefully too decent to repeat the sophistry on the Treasury on this.
His email address is: [email protected]
Please post any responses in the comments section below
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Serviced apartment stamp duty in Edinburgh?
Member Since January 2011 - Comments: 12193 - Articles: 1395
5:05 PM, 25th February 2017, About 9 years ago
Please post the link which appears to be missing from “see questions 45 and 46 here”
.
Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 1013
5:23 PM, 25th February 2017, About 9 years ago
Here’s the link from my reply:
. http://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/treasury-committee/housing-policy/oral/44218.html
Member Since January 2011 - Comments: 12193 - Articles: 1395
5:47 PM, 25th February 2017, About 9 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “Barry Fitzpatrick” at “25/02/2017 – 17:23“:
Thanks Barry 🙂
.
Member Since June 2013 - Comments: 179
11:21 PM, 26th February 2017, About 9 years ago
Sent to both