Councils using ‘Intelligence’ to track down low EPC properties and fine £5,00015:08 PM, 29th March 2021
About 2 weeks ago 36
Research by Hamptons Countrywide has revealed that 41,700 buy-to-let Limited Companies were formed last year, which is a new record. In fact, the only category of Limited Company formations to beat this number was online shopping stores.
Property118 has yet to check and confirm these numbers, but it should be relatively straightforward to do via Companies House but the report also suggests that at the end of 2020 there were a total of 228,743 buy to let companies up and running, again an all-time record. More than a third of these buy to let companies are based in London; add in those based in south east England, and this comes to 47 per cent of all BTL companies.
We will now expend upon this research, to see how many of these buy-t0-let Limited Companies have only one class of ordinary A shares, because this is a very good indication to what level of thought has gone into tax-planning.
Ordinarily, shareholders in a company own just one type of shares, called ‘ordinary’ shares. These have:
However, it is possible to create multiple classes of shares so that differing levels of dividends can be declared to each class of shares. From a tax planning perspective, this can be useful for a family business where the shareholders have different levels of income from other sources. Likewise, it is possible to create a class of shares that initially have a nominal initial value, because they have no voting rights, no capital value and no automatic rights to receive dividends. This class of shares is ideal for inheritance tax planning because future growth in the value of the business can be attributed to them, and they can be gifted without tax implications whilst their value is negligible.
The Property118 tax team have put a label on this form of tax planning – “SMART Property Company structuring”.
The good news is that it is never too late, even if you already have an ‘ordinary’ single class of shares structure. It can be modified.
Likewise, if you have been considering the formation of a property company for your future investment acquisitions, please don’t settle for an ordinary ‘off-the-shelf’ property company. A cheap set up could end up costing you dearly in the longer term. Get your foundations right before you start building!
Tell us about your future property investment aspirations by completing our enquiry form and we will be happy to provide you more information about what is possible and even arrange a ‘one-to-one’ recorded video consultation with one of our landlord tax planning consultants and recommended Barristers-At-Law.
This case study explains why so many Buy-To-Let companies have been formed and why 85% + of all new Buy-To-Let mortgage applications are now in the name of a Limited Company, by comparing the tax position of a private landlord against that of a private hotelier.
Let’s assume that both businesses own assets worth £2,000,000 and have 75% LTV mortgages secured on them at an interest rate of 5%. In other words, their annual finance cost bill is £75,000.
Now let’s assume that both businesses make profits after finance costs and all other expenses of £50,000.
The hotelier will pay £7,500 of income tax. This is broken down as follows; £nil on his first £12,500 of net profit and 20% tax on the next £37,500.
However, the private landlord cannot treat his finance costs as a legitimate cost of business in the same way as the hotelier. Accordingly, his tax bill is £27,500. This is because his taxable income is treated as being £125,000 due to being unable to claim his finance costs as business expenses. Furthermore, for every £2 of taxable income over £100,000 he loses £1 of his nil rate tax band. Accordingly, the landlord pays tax at a rate of 20% on the first £37,500 (which equates to £7,500) and then 40% tax on the other £87,500 (which equates to £35,000). This adds up to a whopping £42,500. The government then grant him a tax credit equal to 20% of his finance costs, in other words £15,000 off the £42,500 leaving him with a net £27,500 of tax to pay.
To summarise, the private landlord pays more nearly four times as much tax as the private hotelier, even though their financing costs and business results otherwise produce identical levels of actual profit.
HOWEVER, if both the landlord and the hotelier operated their businesses within a Limited Company structure, they would pay exactly the same amount of tax.
There are, of course, many other reasons for private rental property businesses to consider incorporation. These might include the following:-
It would be remiss of me to point out that incorporation is not a ‘one-size-fits-all’ strategy. In fact, we only recommend it to around 1 in 10 landlords who book landlord tax planning consultations with us. There are several alternatives, especially if you have relatives who are not higher rate tax payers and you are considering business continuity and legacy planning as well as your income tax position. The key point is that you should seek specialist guidance from a Property118 tax planning consultant, who will prepare a bespoke report and recommendations for you before referring you to a Barrister-At-Law to adopt those recommendations as his own professional advice, for which he carry’s professional indemnity insurance of £2,500,000.Show Form To Book A Tax Planning Consultation
If you ever consider transferring your property rental business into a Limited Company (which all landlords absolutely should do) there are four important considerations you must not overlook:-
Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.