2 years ago | 5 comments
Research reveals that 41% of properties sold under Right to Buy are now privately rented – that’s around 820,000 homes.
And since 2015, another 109,000 former council homes are now in the private rented sector (PRS), the New Economics Foundation (NEF) says.
It warns that the sales are a key factor behind the dwindling availability of social housing.
The organisation also says that since Right to Buy was introduced in 1980, the proportion of social renters has nearly halved – the English Housing Survey says it has fallen from 31% to 16% in 2022/23.
Hollie Wright, an assistant researcher at the NEF, said: “While many have benefited from it, we need to be honest about the devastating impact the Right to Buy scheme has had on our housing system.
“There are millions of people in this country who are denied access to safe, affordable, secure social homes, partly because of Right to Buy.”
She adds: “It’s time to give local councils the powers they need to reverse the damage Right to Buy has done in their communities and give them the tools to tackle the housing crisis.”
The NEF is also revealing which councils have a high percentage of homes sold under Right to Buy which are now in the PRS, they are:
The organisation says that forcing a council to sell a home at a discount means they struggle to build new council homes.
While Right to Buy is aimed at boosting homeownership, the NEF report suggests it’s failing in this aspect as well.
The research found a near-equal number of additional homes sold under Right to Buy compared to the number of ex-council properties now in private rentals between 2014 and 2023.
Conor O’Shea, Generation Rent’s policy and public affairs manager, said: “It is no surprise that the haemorrhaging of homes from the social sector to the hands of private landlords has been a failure for those who actually live there.
“More than a million households are waiting for a council home, while paying much higher rents to private landlords, often for homes in a much poorer condition than they’d have in social housing.”
NEF is recommending that Westminster devolves more power to local councils so they can:
NEF also says that the Treasury should amend rules to make it easier for councils to use finance the building of replacement council homes.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Do we legally have to pay for our tenants' tree to be felled?Next Article
Waiting time for a bailiff in Ilford?
2 years ago | 5 comments
2 years ago | 3 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2025
10:09 AM, 21st May 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Marlena Topple at 20/05/2024 – 11:42
I see what you are saying. However, renting a property for perhaps 1/3 of what the going rate would be for a given an area then being given the ‘right’ to buy that asset that you rented at a discount at a purchase price that itself receives a 35%-50% discount is beyond barking whether you reinvest that money in housing or not.