3 years ago | 8 comments
Labour appears to be flirting with the idea of rent controls or capping rent rises and tightening up on the Decent Homes Standard under its Renters’ Charter. The issue has raised its head again recently but for me this charter is a charter for disaster. So, let’s consider what might happen to landlords in England if it looks like Starmer and Co take over power. And my first question is: When should we put rents up? Now or wait for Labour to get in?
Essentially, if the Tories don’t do it first with their Renters (Reform) Bill, Labour has pledged to end Section 21 evictions, extend notice periods and allow tenants to have pets and make alterations to their homes. These policies could have a significant impact on your income and your rights as a landlord.
None of these ideas is good news and will cost us whatever happens – and that’s not taking into account the struggles that will come to evict a non-paying tenant.
So, why should you put up your rent now and not wait for Labour? Let me explain:
So, I mentioned the rate rises are making BTL mortgages very expensive. Most landlords will have equity to help, but there will be lots of landlords that don’t have a business model geared up to higher mortgage payments. We can criticise them all we want but some landlords have entered the sector on a wing and a prayer and are likely to be found out. But if you are thinking of selling your rental property, you might want to do it sooner rather than later because:
It should come as no surprise that I believe that landlords should raise their rents now, if they can, and not wait for a Labour government. Labour’s policies could reduce your income and rights as a landlord and make it harder for you to sell your property in the future.
By raising your rents now, you are getting in before Labour inevitably brings in its shortsighted rent caps and you could sell up to maximise your profit and minimise your exposure to Labour’s plans.
Whatever happens, it’s the tenant that will pay the price with higher rents and fewer property choices. It’s always the tenant that pays in the end, but no-one will care as politicians, the media and tenant groups turn the private rented sector into a political football. No-one is listening to us – putting up rents to market rates and see the number of homes to rent dwindle might just make our critics take a step back.
I never thought I would be crossing my fingers in the hope that the current crop of no-hopers, slippery buffoons and anti-landlord Conservatives would get re-elected – it’s a long shot and I’m hoping that a Labour Party bereft of appealing ideas and one of the dullest political leaders of all time will still fall at the final hurdle.
Until next time,
The Landlord Crusader
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Properties Urgently Required – Exclusive P118 members dealNext Article
What is a "mixed" partnership?
3 years ago | 8 comments
3 years ago | 1 comments
3 years ago | 7 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since July 2023 - Comments: 1
9:40 AM, 14th July 2023, About 3 years ago
You left out the fact ( an important one) that the money to buy,is drying up, soon it will be non existing.
The treasury want to curtail inflation,their only tool,is higher interest rates, they have also ( in my opinion) told banks to stop refinancing property, ( Ive been in this business and many more through every recession since WW11,started when I was 19years old) they always start,by making finance ” difficult” to obtain and only stop when they make it ” impossible” to obtain, we are a little way off that yet,but getting there.
Good luck with selling up,with all the media attention focused on the downsides of being a landlord.
Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 508
9:58 AM, 14th July 2023, About 3 years ago
Is there any provision to indemnify the landlord against any claim arising from a legally ‘permitted’ alteration by a tenant that leads directly to a damages claim from a visitor or a superior landlord? I bet that answers are Not thought of and No?
Member Since August 2017 - Comments: 149
12:00 PM, 14th July 2023, About 3 years ago
As always a very good article from Landlord Crusader. Thank you.
What Labour is talking about is worrying, although there have been mixed messages as you will see if you compare “Labour’s New Deal on Housing”:
https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Housing-Mini-Manifesto.pdf
…with recent statements by Rachel Reeves:
https://order-order.com/2023/07/05/watch-rachel-reeves-reverses-labours-rent-control-support-denies-u-turn/
However, some landlords like myself cannot easily exit the market because we bought back in the 1990s and would face punishing levels of Capital Gains Tax on properties held in our names because there is no indexation allowance for these properties, in contrast to those held in limited companies.
For landlords with low gearing, the rapid increase in rents and low voids that results from political meddling driving out other landlords is a positive. I’ve added extra bedrooms and invested heavily to raise standards and believe that residential property can be made to work, although I’m expecting house prices to fall substantially over the next couple of years. The alternative investments aren’t great either – I wouldn’t touch cryptocurrencies with a barge pole and UK equities haven’t performed particularly well.
But when people ask me if they should invest now, I always say don’t.
Member Since November 2022 - Comments: 6
10:18 PM, 14th July 2023, About 3 years ago
Speculating on a think tank is not good. You have to see the actual policies and not base so much on speculation.
Conservatives have been a disaster for small and medium landlords. They have transferred wealth upwards in every sector of British society and they are just getting it on for smaller landlords who dare to have aspiration.
Wealthy and corporatuon based landlords who do not rely on a mortgages are massing wealth like never before and this is by design. Vote them out and watch Labour balance out the wealth transfer and actual build houses.
Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1506
12:42 PM, 16th July 2023, About 3 years ago
I can’t see what all the hoo ha is all about letting tenants have pets. Most of my tenants have cats or dogs and they cause no issues at all.
As for modifications to the property I did have a tenant who wanted to build a ramp and put up a handrail by the front step. I told him no, so he left.
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 617
4:27 PM, 16th July 2023, About 3 years ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 16/07/2023 – 12:42
I currently have 2 long term tenants who have small pet dogs which they have owned for several years and they are not a problem.
However I will not have tenants with pets again after the awful mess and damage left behind when a couple with a dog vacated a property last year.
It was horrendous and cost thousands of pounds to rectify.
There is no way of predicting who will be responsible pet owners.
So why would I take the same risk again when it could result in costing lots of dosh?