8 months ago | 3 comments
The Scottish government’s focus on bringing empty and second homes back into use will not solve the nation’s housing crisis, one property expert says.
David Alexander, the chief executive of Scotland’s largest lettings and estate agency, DJ Alexander Ltd, says the efforts are commendable but won’t tackle the urgent need for homes.
His comments come after Housing Secretary Mairi McAllan announced measures to tackle ‘unacceptable’ levels of empty homes across Scotland.
She pledged funding for additional empty homes officers, who will work under the Scottish Empty Homes Partnership (SEHP) to identify and encourage owners to bring unused properties to market.
Ms McAllan stated: “Bringing homes back into use is a vital part of our plan to tackle the housing emergency – when too many families are struggling to find somewhere to live, it is unacceptable to me that so many houses are lying empty for long periods.”
The SEHP, supported by a £2m annual Scottish Government investment, has facilitated the return of nearly 11,000 homes to use over the past 15 years.
According to SEHP data for 2023/24, 46,217 homes were vacant for at least six months, with 28,280 empty for over a year.
Highland reported the highest number of long-term vacant properties at 3,334, followed by Edinburgh (2,751) and Aberdeen (2,615).
In contrast, East Renfrewshire recorded just 62 homes vacant for six months, with no data for longer periods, while Clackmannanshire and East Dunbartonshire had 102 and 220 homes empty for over a year, respectively.
However, SEHP notes that reasons for prolonged vacancies vary, including challenges contacting owners, ongoing repairs, financial constraints, inheritance issues or legal delays.
Some owners are undecided about their property’s future, while others are unwilling to sell or rent.
The debate also touches on second homes, often cited as a factor in housing shortages.
Yet, recent Scottish Government figures reveal a 10% drop in second homes to 21,606 in 2024, the largest decline in a decade.
These properties now represent just 1% of Scotland’s housing stock.
Mr Alexander said: “There is little doubt that regenerating and reviving homes which have been empty for a substantial period of time can be beneficial for an area.
“A property that is an eyesore in a village, town or city can only be improved by renovation.”
However, he warns that focusing on the 28,280 homes vacant for over a year misses the broader issue.
He added: “Even if all of these houses are put on the market immediately, this will do little to alleviate the accumulated problems the country currently faces.”
Mr Alexander highlighted that vacancies often stem from legitimate reasons, such as owners being abroad, in hospital, or dealing with complex estate settlements.
He also expressed concern that targeting empty and second homes distracts from the critical need to boost housebuilding.
Mr Alexander said: “While the aims may be laudable, this is not the solution to the current housing emergency.
“The answer is to increase the volume of new home building which would resolve our current housing issues long before reducing the number of empty and second homes and holiday lets would make a small dent in the overall shortages.
“These are sticking plaster solutions to a gaping wound problem.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Tenant in arrears left for Dublin?Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1979
11:31 AM, 11th July 2025, About 8 months ago
This government often does ‘Miss The Wider Issue’ because it’s living in a 1970s bubble of its own making.
The Daily Mail just reported that the wealthy are starting to shun Sandbanks (the fourth most expensive place in the world to buy a house and Britain’s most expensive post code). Estate agents and developers have revealed a staggering drop in demand and that the Sandbanks bubble has burst with the blame levelled at Keir Starmer’s door.
The government needs to understand that they are competing with the likes of Monaco, Italy and elsewhere for wealthy people who pay a lot of tax. Even with merely ordinary people who just have pensions that Rachel Reeves has now included in the IHT net, these ordinary working people (e.g. plumbers) can take their pensions to Cyprus or Portugual and spend them there.
Because even small businesses do their business online or “work from home” small businesses can also go offshore: It’s not 1974 when Denis Healey came to power; even Denis Healey proved that taxing rock stars and film stars makes them relocate to places that want them, because they want their tax revenues, including taxing their consumption as they spend their wealth.
If Scotland targets buy-to-let investors they will invest in England, and if Angela Raynor or Ed Miliband attack investors in England then they will invest in something else other than housing. That’s market economics; the housing crisis is something that government has CREATED.
Keir Starmer keeps banging on about AI but the best case for using AI is in our rail network and the NHS to get the bill for these public services down.
Rachel Reeves is trying to bring about economic recovery by trying to force UK pension fundss to invest in UK businesses: But they’d do more to bring about economic recovery if they stopped attacking the residential housing market.