2 weeks ago | 1 comments
Hobby landlords are increasingly leaving the PRS because of the Renters’ Rights Act, while other landlords will increase tenant checks and tighten letting criteria, raising questions about rental home access for some potential tenants.
Those are the views of Louisa Sedgwick, the managing director of mortgages at Paragon Bank, who was speaking on a podcast hosted by Tom Bill, the head of UK residential research at Knight Frank.
She said landlord behaviour is shifting ahead of the 1 May start date.
Ms Sedgwick pointed to changes around rent in advance and affordability checks, which are beginning to influence decision-making.
She said: “I think what will happen without a shadow of a doubt, and you are already seeing this, is that the due diligence that landlords will do on any new tenant will be significantly higher than it has been in the past.
“A tenant can now no longer pay rent in advance, and that might have been a way to secure a property if they had a previous poor credit history or they weren’t working or relying on universal credit.”
She added: “We’ll see more vulnerable tenants not being able to secure properties as a result of the Renters’ Rights Act.”
Ms Sedgwick said a combination of tax changes and higher stamp duty is feeding into landlord exits.
She said: “There is absolutely a move towards hobby landlords leaving the sector.
“It just becomes harder, and I think this is kind of the point where landlords say, unless I’m going to do this either as a full-time role or certainly concentrate and focus time and effort on making sure that I can make this a viable business, then I’m actually going to move out of the sector.”
Tom Bill said rental home supply continues to influence conditions.
He said: “The decline in available stock means tenants are competing more intensely in some parts of London.
“Landlords who remain are operating in a market where yields have adjusted alongside weaker sales prices.”
Ms Sedgwick also outlined her involvement in discussions with government and industry bodies during the legislative process.
She said: “My feeling was that this was in the Labour Party manifesto, and as such, they were going to implement it.
“So, regardless of whether or not they understood and were listening, I think that they’d reached the point where there was just no going back on this particular change in legislation.”
Further changes to rented homes will come with the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standard requirements, targeting an EPC C rating by 2030.
Ms Sedgwick said: “This particular change in legislation I think is going to be bigger and potentially more demanding because I don’t believe we’ve got the infrastructure to support it.”
She continued: “We’re talking 1,800 properties per day that will need to be upgraded by October 2030.
“We don’t have the tradespeople because they’re busy building the 1.5 million homes that have been committed to from this government.”
She said the sector is shifting in structure, adding: “You’ve seen the move towards larger apartment blocks with concierges and gyms that have been built by insurance and investment companies.
“It is going to be a community of landlords that do this as part of their everyday roles as opposed to doing this just as a hobby or off the side of the desk.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
2 weeks ago | 1 comments
2 weeks ago | 5 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 205
8:37 PM, 22nd April 2026, About 3 days ago
Reply to the comment left by BobbyBisto at 22/04/2026 – 16:53
The Act and all the politicisation of property and renting is clearly designed to gradually force “undesirable” private landlords out and have them replaced by proper entities like larger companies and corporations.
You only need to look at the level of fines being threatened, which are way beyond what a private citizen is subjected to in any other situation, and much more like those levied on corporations. It’s a clear message to get out or risk financial ruin.
If that doesn’t convince you, consider the constant dehumanisation and demonisation of “greedy landlords” characterised as ruthlessly and arbitrarily depriving people of their homes when they just want or need to regain possession of their own private property.
If you look at the way Nazi propaganda was aimed at Jews amassing fortunes, taking jobs away from ordinary Germans and other undesirable activities, the parallels are quite similar. Hopefully they won’t be marching us off to the gas chambers any time soon, but we are getting dangerously close to state confiscation which did happen. And in case anyone was wondering, my ancestors on my grandmother’s side were Jewish and fled persecution..
Member Since August 2019 - Comments: 14
2:52 PM, 25th April 2026, About 1 hour ago
Nothing “Hobby” about landlords. It’s a business and not an investments as HMRC have deemed.
What other investments do you pay ad-hoc, unknown and often large costs and charges towards that you can’t liquidate easily.
Also the term landlord should be changed. It’s too feudal and medieval. With lease properties we are not even the landlords. Something like Housing Provider would be more apt… But doesn’t carry the same impact for GenRent and co.