Planning reforms alone will not fix housing crisis – Propertymark

Planning reforms alone will not fix housing crisis – Propertymark

Model house, calculator and magnifying glass on planning maps illustrating UK housing development and costs
12:01 AM, 11th February 2026, 2 months ago 2

An industry body has warned the government that planning reforms alone will not be enough to deliver 1.5 million homes.

Propertymark’s Meeting UK House Demand position paper sets out recommendations for policymakers, including empowering councils to build more homes and supporting smaller developers in development planning.

The Labour government promised in its manifesto to build 1.5 million homes by the end of this Parliament.

Planning reform is not the sole reason the UK is failing to build enough homes

Propertymark warns the scale of the housing shortage has seen more than 1 million people stuck on social housing waiting lists.

In some areas of England, such as Westminster, families would have to wait 107 years before they would have access to a social home with three or more bedrooms.

The industry body claims with demand for social housing at record highs, people are turning to the private rented sector (PRS).

However, Propertymark says a lack of supply and high demand in the PRS has seen average rent costs across England have risen faster than real wage growth.

Timothy Douglas, head of policy and campaigns at Propertymark, says planning reforms alone will not solve the housing crisis.

He said: “There is no doubt that the planning system needs reform, but it is not the sole reason the UK is failing to build enough homes. For decades, homes were delivered at scale under the same planning framework because local authorities were building, skills were available, and developments were incentivised to progress quickly.

“If we continue to treat planning reform as the single solution, we risk ignoring the wider structural problems that are holding back delivery. To genuinely meet housing demand, governments across the UK must take a more holistic approach that supports builders, councils, and communities alike.”

Councils must build more homes

Propertymark recommends that local authorities take a greater role in building homes. According to their position paper, the number of council-built homes has dropped dramatically, from 85% in 1951 to just 0.06% in 2004, and, despite recent increases, councils still accounted for only 2.2% of homes in 2023.

Propertymark says councils should explore ways to build more homes, particularly affordable housing, which could help ease pressure on the private rented sector.

Propertymark also calls for a streamlined planning process and financial incentives for small and medium-sized enterprises to encourage new start-ups and greater involvement of smaller firms in development projects. They say local authorities should set clear, local schemes for planning delegation that benefit residents and speed up planning decisions.

Propertymark also urges the government to launch a national recruitment and skills campaign to address the construction worker shortage and recommends that councils review stalled projects, issuing binding resolutions for major delays, with large or critical developments referred to the Secretary of State.

The industry body warns that without action, the UK will continue to fall short of its housing targets, regardless of how streamlined the planning system becomes.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since March 2022 - Comments: 365

    2:22 PM, 11th February 2026, About 2 months ago

    You can give developers as much land as you want but they will only build if it is commercially viable for them. This means they are only interested in top spec, top end property to sell to well off people, nothing affordable for the rest of the population.
    Our local Labour Council is fighting back a bit denying planning permission based on housing density. They have turned down applications with low housing density (ie high end houses) and told developers they will get permission if more houses are built on a site to meet targets and presumably on the assumption that the more crowded in the houses are, the cheaper they will be.
    Underlying this is the Council’s desperate need to get any houses at all built, so it will be interesting if the developers or the council cave in first.

  • Member Since December 2024 - Comments: 62

    10:16 AM, 12th February 2026, About 2 months ago

    There is a long list of things against developers:
    1. Nimbys
    2. Affordable housing s.106
    3. Community Infrastructure Levy
    4. Nutrient neutrality
    5. Biodiversity net gain
    6. No skilled labour
    7. Build cost inflation
    8. CGT
    9. UK Govt
    10. District councils
    11. Parish councils

    How are you supposed to build and make a profit against this backdrop?

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles