2 years ago | 10 comments
In a bid to address the escalating number of migrants crossing the Channel, the Home Office has intensified efforts to secure private rental properties for asylum seekers on lucrative tenancy deals.
The initiative, led by contractor Serco, offers landlords guaranteed five-year leases at full rent, funded by taxpayers, to accommodate the growing number of arrivals.
The deal will also see Serco offering free property management, free utilities and council tax bills and a full repair and maintenance of the property.
Landlords interested in working with Serco should read these previous articles on Property118:
Serco contract was a train wreck!
Should I rent to Serco for 7 years?
However, the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA), says that the government needs to get its act together to encourage landlord investment with a tax and regulatory regime to support them.
Serco manages more than 30,000 asylum seekers across 7,000 properties and is now actively recruiting landlords in regions like the North West, Midlands and East of England.
Promotional materials highlight ‘on-time rent with no arrears’, free property management and coverage of utilities and council tax.
However, the policy has ignited controversy with critics, including shadow home secretary Chris Philp, who argue it prioritises migrants over British people struggling to find homes to rent.
He told the Telegraph: “This lays bare Labour’s shameful failures. Because they have let in record numbers of illegal immigrants so far this year, via Serco the government is offering better than market terms to landlords to house them.
“This is taking away homes that hard-working, tax-paying Britons who are struggling to find a place to rent need.
“Labour is once again giving a better deal to illegal immigrants than people who have lived, worked and paid tax here all their lives.
“These illegal immigrants should have been sent to Rwanda, not put up in nice flats.”
The NRLA’s chief executive, Ben Beadle, said: “The government’s reliance on the private-rented sector to house those in the greatest need is nothing new. However, the Home Office’s use of private landlords highlights the growing shortage of available homes and the lack of consistency between government departments.
“Whilst half of Whitehall is scrabbling to hit housing targets and find accommodation for potentially homeless households, the other half seems hell-bent on devising ways to dissuade investment in homes.”
He added: “If the Government is serious about meeting housing need, and growing our way out of the current crisis, then it needs to incentivise investment. Landlords need the confidence that both the regulatory and tax regime will allow them to plan and to flourish.
“Without this the market will continue to stagnate, and demand will further outstrip the limited supply of housing available.”
The government’s push follows a record-breaking surge in small boat arrivals, with 9,638 people crossing illegally this year — a 44.5% increase from 2024 and the highest since 2018.
With warmer weather forecast, officials anticipate further spikes.
The Home Office now supports 65,700 asylum seekers, a decade-high, doubling the 31,000 housed in 2014.
Labour’s strategy, building on a Conservative-era policy, targets houses in multiple occupation, family homes and student accommodation to reduce reliance on costly hotels, which house 38,000 asylum seekers at £5.5 million daily. Private rentals cost £14 per night, compared to £145 for hotels.
Sir Keir Starmer, during the last election, vowed to ‘end asylum hotels, saving the taxpayer billions of pounds’.
Councils and charities warn that the scheme inflates rents, sidelining young workers, families and the homeless.
With 1.3 million on social housing waiting lists, one council leader criticised Serco for ‘encouraging landlords to exploit taxpayers’, impacting local services and cohesion.
A housing executive who has advised the government said homes are being denied to local people, adding: “Whether they are long-term residents of the UK or immigrants, they should surely come ahead of asylum seekers and illegal migrants who turn up and demand assistance.”
A Home Office spokesman defended the policy and told the Telegraph: “These arrangements with the private rented sector have been in place for years, including under the previous government.
“We have a statutory duty to support destitute asylum seekers who will not be able to pay for fees such as utilities and council tax.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Next Article
Slower house price growth but sales rise - Zoopla
2 years ago | 10 comments
3 years ago | 17 comments
3 years ago | 28 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 1190
12:14 PM, 28th April 2025, About 12 months ago
Reply to the comment left by David Houghton at 28/04/2025 – 12:04
Ahh yes good point.
Member Since May 2020 - Comments: 17
3:16 PM, 28th April 2025, About 12 months ago
!00% will not be having any of my houses end of
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1999
3:36 PM, 28th April 2025, About 12 months ago
Reply to the comment left by The Property Man at 28/04/2025 – 15:16
I have an open mind about housing anybody that I can be sure will pay me, get on with the neighbours and look after the property. And an asylum seeker might tick those boxes more easily than a social housing tenant. But whether I wanted to or not, neither my insurance company nor my mortgage provider will let me house asylum seekers.
If the figures in the article are right, Serco is already housing 30,000 asylum seekers (out of the total of 65,700 asylum seekers, almost 60% of whom are currently housed in hotels) across 7,000 properties then asylum seekers are already competing against other tenants, including social housing tenants, in the rental market. What the government needs to do is to make it more attractive for landlords to house social housing tenants otherwise these trends are going to fuel a lot of tension.
Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 402
3:59 PM, 28th April 2025, About 12 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Markella Mikkelsen at 28/04/2025 – 11:27
Serco will give their clients a licence. They won’t be tenants. It’s like when you stay in a a hotel you have a license to occupy but not a right to exclude
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5
7:13 PM, 28th April 2025, About 12 months ago
hahahah – first they condemn us, now they need us!
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5
7:31 PM, 28th April 2025, About 12 months ago
Landords with properties in great areas wont want to get involved in this at all. Asset protection.
Landlords with properties in good areas already have to fight off good applicants as the housing shortage deepens and the RRB is edging ever nearer. ( I see more properties will go up for same and more S21’s issued before RRB implementation)
Landlords with properties in not great areas may POSSIBLY be swayed at the vision of 5 years paid rent, and possibly not worry particularly about the state of the property at the end.
Landlords with properties in the shi* areas will see this as a cash cow. An influx of refugees in certain areas wont rock the boat (as heaving already) and especially if the income religion also mirrors the existing. The councils will not get involved for fear of the ‘race card’ being played when it comes to anti social issues and the majority being Labour also will bury their head and hum to themselves, afterall this is 2TK new policy so it must solve the issue!
The only upset I see if if the influx is into white lower class areas – coloured faces stick out like a sore thumb and any housing ‘priority’ over those already on the housing lists wont go down well.
Remember last summers riots Keir? Part 2 cometh I suspect….
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5
7:42 PM, 28th April 2025, About 12 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 28/04/2025 – 10:52
I don’t have any responsibility at all to house anyone the government can’t/wont.
Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 402
7:51 PM, 28th April 2025, About 12 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 28/04/2025 – 19:31
Yep. Let’s make it happen. Do what the government want and let it bring them down
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5
8:05 PM, 28th April 2025, About 12 months ago
Reply to the comment left by David Houghton at 28/04/2025 – 19:51
Like the government themselves leading by example, I will let others deal with the chaos that this WILL undoubtedly cause.
They have already pi$$ed off pensioners, the disabled, those on benefits, and all those that are currently on waiting lists for social housing (soon to be growing ahead of the RRB). All the very same Labour voters that got them in the position of power in the first place….
Lets see what the local elections bring. I see a swing to Reform as a direct result of all of the above. Yes its a protest vote and nothing on the national level BUT its indicative of what what the feeling is all over the country in regard to the Muppet Show currently on a repeat cycle.
Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 1190
8:25 PM, 28th April 2025, About 12 months ago
I can’t see any of this happening as mortgage lenders and insurance companies preclude letting to asylum seekers.