Loophole that beats HMRC’s IHT tax grab

by Steve Sims

16:12 PM, 7th June 2011
About 7 years ago

Loophole that beats HMRC’s IHT tax grab

Make Text Bigger
Loophole that beats HMRC’s IHT tax grab

Taxpayers who have fallen foul of HM Revenue and Customs policy of checking out property valuations targeting larger inheritance tax payments from estates can fight back with a little known loophole.

Refunds on overpaid inheritance tax (IHT) can be claimed for homes that are worth less than the value on the deceased owner’s date of death.

Taxpayers have to meet four basic conditions to claim the money back from HMRC with interest:

  • They must be an ‘appropriate person’ like an executor
  • The claim is for land or property, like a home
  • The sale at the higher price was within 48 months of the deceased’s death
  • The current value is 1% or £5,000 less than the date of death value (whichever is lowest)

Proving these points switches the lesser value for the date of death value and decreases the amount of IHT due.

Check out how a claim might affect the sale of any other land or property by the estate. If other land or buildings were sold and the prices have gone up, the taxman can ask for more IHT.

Time limits for a claim are six year’s from the date of death.

Claim on Form IHT38, which is available for free download from http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/cto/forms/iht38.pdf

HMRC has reviewed around 10,000 IHT cases and raised £70 million in extra tax after revising property values in the past year.

With falling property values over recent years, anyone who has sold a home and paid IHT should look at reclaiming some of the tax with interest from HMRC.

A HMRC spokesman said: “Only about 3% of estates pay any inheritance tax, but when the value of the property can materially affect the tax payable it’s only right that we confirm the value offered.

“This is not an investigation but a routine check which in the vast majority of cases simply confirms the value offered. This helps to protect both the Exchequer and the taxpayer.”



Comments

21:03 PM, 14th June 2011
About 7 years ago

I think the article is supposed to say sold at a lower price than valued for IHT?

David


Leave Comments

Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.

Forgotten your password?

OR

BECOME A MEMBER

Shelter's website says Section 21 does not cause homelessness

The Landlords Union

Become a Member, it's FREE

Our mission is to facilitate the sharing of best practice amongst UK landlords, tenants and letting agents

Learn More