2 years ago | 1 comments
New data from London Councils paints a grim picture of the capital’s homelessness crisis, revealing a shocking 40% increase in monthly spending on temporary accommodation for homeless households last year.
This translates to a staggering £90 million per month.
The report warns of a ‘critical danger’ to borough finances due to skyrocketing homelessness rates and a severe lack of affordable housing.
The situation is being made worse by private landlords quitting the temporary accommodation market, opting for higher returns from private tenants or selling their properties altogether.
The latest figures show a 56.5% rise in ‘notices to quit’ received by boroughs from landlords.
Cllr Darren Rodwell, London Councils’ executive member for regeneration, housing and planning, said: “Homelessness has a devastating impact on individuals and families, while also bringing massive and unsustainable costs to boroughs’ budgets.
“Boroughs work hard to house homeless Londoners. However, London’s ballooning temporary accommodation bill is a critical danger to boroughs’ financial stability.”
He added: “If things go on the way they are, it’s no exaggeration to say these enormous costs pose a bankruptcy risk.
“We’re urging ministers to boost funding support for boroughs grappling with a worsening homelessness crisis.
“Ending the unfair cap on housing benefit subsidy rates for temporary accommodation would relieve much of the pressure on boroughs’ resources, helping us balance the books while providing homelessness support to everyone who needs it.”
Ahead of the upcoming budget, London Councils are urging the government for increased support to help boroughs manage these rising costs and avoid the need for a Section 114 notice, essentially declaring bankruptcy.
A key demand is lifting the ‘unfair’ cap on government funding that subsidises temporary accommodation costs, currently based on outdated 2011 benefit rates and failing to reflect current market realities.
The report further highlights the worsening situation:
The data shows that London accounts for more than half (57%) of England’s homeless households in temporary accommodation.
London’s homelessness crisis has been escalating for years, with the number of households in temporary accommodation almost doubling since 2010.
The Covid-19 pandemic, coupled with the rising cost of living and a turbulent private rented sector, has further exacerbated the issue.
With the current spending trajectory, London is on track to spend more than £1 billion every year on temporary accommodation.
While some government funding is available, it falls short, leaving boroughs facing a projected budget overspend of at least £150 million this year.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
TDS simplifies tenant deposit protection with API integrationNext Article
S21 and breathing space debt respite scheme?Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since September 2021 - Comments: 104
7:44 PM, 28th February 2024, About 2 years ago
The beatings will continue until morale improves, no doubt!
Member Since February 2020 - Comments: 105
10:00 PM, 28th February 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Mick Roberts at 28/02/2024 – 10:59
It will be twisted by somewhere along the lines of ” homelessness skyrockets due to landlords issuing no fault Section 21 notices because of tenants complaining about repairs ” , where really it should read ” homelessness skyrockets as landlords exit owing to relentless , unprovoked attacks from local and central government “
Member Since January 2016 - Comments: 11
1:09 PM, 2nd March 2024, About 2 years ago
Getting rid of Section 24, but clearly stating Section 21 will stay, as well as usin existing laws to prosecute the small number of rogue landlords, rather than introducing more expensive ineffective regulations, would cost nothing, and slow down the Landlord exodus, caused by using the PRS as a political football.
Simple, but, obviously, still too complicated for the current crop of second-rate MPs and Councillors to grasp