LHA freeze leaves one million renters facing growing rent shortfall

Frozen LHA support falling behind rising private rents for low-income renters
8:58 AM, 24th September 2026, 3 weeks ago 3
Categories:

More than one million low-income renters face crisis as the gap between rents and benefit support is set to hit a record high, claims a think tank.

The Resolution Foundation is calling on the government to unfreeze Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rates at the Autumn Budget, warning that the growing gap between rents and housing support is putting increasing pressure on low-income renters.

The think tank is calling on the government to unfreeze Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rates at the Autumn Budget.

LHA shortfall will grow over time

According to the think tank’s Saving Private Renters report, fewer than 2% of homes listed for rent in Great Britain could be covered by LHA alone.

The data reveals that low-income families renting a two-bedroom home in inner East London face a typical monthly shortfall of £324, while the shortfall is at least £200 across the rest of London.

The Resolution Foundation says this shortfall will only grow over time because LHA rates were last linked to actual rents in April 2024 and have been frozen ever since. As rents rise, the gap between support and rental costs widens, with the shortfall set to reach a record 23.3% in October this year.

The data also challenges concerns that increasing LHA rates could lead to higher rents, with just 10p of every pound of additional LHA support showing up as higher rents at the bottom of the market.

This mirrors previous research which found that 90% of the 2011 LHA cut fell on tenants, with only around one-tenth reflected in lower rents.

The April 2024 LHA uplift also reduced the number of Universal Credit households in England facing a rent shortfall by more than 150,000, directly benefiting the families it was intended to support.

Relieve the pressure on low-income families in the PRS

The Resolution Foundation says the policy to unfreeze LHA rates would cost £2 billion a year by 2029-30, but benefit more than one million low-income renters.

Stephen Hunsaker, economist at the Resolution Foundation, said the government must unfreeze LHA rates in the Autumn Budget next month.

He said: “The gap between average rents and Local Housing Allowance levels is set to reach a record high this October, and failing to repeg LHA to actual rents in next month’s Budget could lock in a freeze for another year, and see the gap reach 30% by March 2028.

“Rather than primarily benefitting landlords, our new analysis shows that the last time LHA was repegged to local rents in April 2024 it was tenants that benefited, with the fraction of LHA recipients facing a shortfall between their rents and the amount they could claim dropping significantly.

“With many tenants receiving housing support already going without essentials to pay their rent today, the government should restore the automatic annual linking of LHA to relieve the pressure on low-income families in the private rented sector.”

As previously reported by Property118, the government has defended freezing LHA rates, claiming a range of factors were considered before the freeze, including “the challenging fiscal context”.


Share This Article

  • Member Since December 2025 - Comments: 24

    9:48 AM, 24th September 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    They definitely should unfreeze the LHA and pay landlords directly. Also the top up should go to landlords directly. This would alter the situation whereby people on benefits find it almost impossible to find accommodation available for them to rent. From a landlords point of view this would much reduce the problem of rent arrears and make a lot of landlords more interested in investing in property instead of selling up. It would also mean a lot less evictions and massively reduce the backlog of cases courts are having to deal with.

  • Member Since June 2015 - Comments: 366

    10:24 AM, 24th September 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    The LHA is currently woefully inadequate for anyone trying to find a new home. For some long term tenants, landlords have artificially kept rents close to LHA for various reasons. Maybe the tenant is totally hassle free or maybe it’s because charging more would push the landlord into a tax situation where an increase loses them money. Loss of personal allowance, loss of funded childcare, etc. Sometimes it’s a landlords perception that the person is living in poverty purely because they claim UC. The myriad of income disregards makes it incredibly hard to determine a UC tenants ability to pay closer to market rent. One of my UC tenants (elderly gentleman with cancer and mental health issues on UC) couldn’t afford to pay above LHA rent unless he gave up eating. Any rent increase above LHA would cause him huge distress and possibly death. My newest UC tenant (employed single mum, receiving child support) can comfortably afford £250 per month above LHA and still have a very nice lifestyle.

    With all the extra costs coming our way (data base fee, extra 2% tax, all the usual increases for insurance, maintenence, etc) we will have to put rents up. The thing to remember is that we don’t get to keep much or any of the increase. It all goes to cover the increased costs of all the things we are obliged to pay for.
    I didn’t increase rents for any UC tenants last year but it isn’t fair to my self financing tenants to load all the increases onto them. In the coming year it will have to be spread across everyone, regardless of what the government does with LHA.

    The silver lining for the government (or general tax payer) is HMRC will receive a huge chunk of any increase in LHA back as income tax from landlords and additional VAT on the extra money spent by tenants in the wider economy.

  • Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 977

    11:05 AM, 24th September 2026, About 3 weeks ago

    I would love just one of these charities to start worrying about ‘Saving Private Landlords ‘ instead they keep beating the suppliers and ignoring the fundamental truth that without us there will be far fewer houses to rent.


Related Articles