9 months ago | 12 comments
A letting agent in North Yorkshire has criticised local authorities over selective licensing schemes, describing them as a “cash cow” that causes landlords to leave the PRS.
Speaking to Teesside Live, Guisborough-based letting agent Alistair Oswin, says “all selective licensing schemes do is push landlords out of the market.”
The site also had views from other contributors, with a councillor blaming landlords for failing to tackle anti-social behaviour.
Councils claim selective licensing schemes address issues such as poor housing conditions and anti-social behaviour.
However, Mr Oswin disagrees and says these schemes are only designed for councils to make a profit.
Mr Oswin told Teesside Live: “Housing associations must also be held accountable. From my perspective, selective licensing is a cash cow for local authorities.
“It drives landlords out of the sector, reduces supply, and pushes up rents.”
However, a councillor in Brotton, claimed landlords are not doing enough when it comes to anti-social behaviour and defended selective licensing schemes.
Councillor Barry Hunt told Teesside Live: “There are persistent issues in the area and it’s just a certain few [tenants] that are causing the bother and we are getting a bit fed up. If a landlord has someone in a property that is continually abusing the situation, they should be held responsible, they are getting the money every week.”
However, a Teesside Live reader points out landlords should not be to blame and the scheme is just another tax for landlords.
The reader says on the site: “If it’s always the same people, then why haven’t they been arrested? This is just passing the buck and blaming landlords, also if it’s just a few, why punish the good landlords?
“All this does is drive them out, resulting in fewer available rental properties & higher rents. It’s always the people at the bottom of the chain (tenants) who lose out. Selective licensing doesn’t work, it’s just yet another tax. Use existing regulations and the law to fix the situation.”
A spokesperson for Redcar and Cleveland council told Teesside Live: “We are currently assessing the data and encouraging residents to report issues to us. If the data tells us that selective licensing is necessary, we will consider it.”
In nearby Middlesbrough, selective licensing schemes are in place in North Ormesby and part of the Newport ward, and have been criticised by landlords who say it is a “private tax” that is forcing them to keep rented homes empty.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Six in 10 landlords have put rents up over the past year
9 months ago | 12 comments
9 months ago | 4 comments
9 months ago | 9 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since February 2025 - Comments: 15
10:09 AM, 29th July 2025, About 8 months ago
Definition of Selective Licencing.
“Legalised THEFT to feed bankrupt councils – Packaged as a scheme when it’s really a TAX
Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 317
10:14 AM, 29th July 2025, About 8 months ago
The whole point of ‘selective licensing’ is it really supposed to be ‘targeted’ in areas of the borough and for 5 YEARS. I.e. NOT continually renewed and expanded borough-wide like HMOs. Dodgy LLs don’t sign up to any schemes anyway. This is total abuse of power from councils.
Included in the RRB is the labour amendment for the councils to do 24 hour property inspections (without notice to the LL being made aware) and councils will generate even more profit from the civil fines their can dish out for small minor issues. MORE ABUSE.
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 88
11:33 PM, 29th July 2025, About 8 months ago
It’s Teesside, as on the side of the River Tees, not Teeside.
Sorry, I’m a northerner 😳