Left-wing think tank claims landlords should face same tax rates as tenants

Left-wing think tank claims landlords should face same tax rates as tenants

House-shaped block with tax letters symbolizing property tax reform
9:01 AM, 24th September 2025, 7 months ago 14
Categories:

Ahead of the Budget, a left-leaning think tank claims “landlords should face the same tax rates as tenants,” calling for changes to Section 24.

In a report, the Resolution Foundation urged Chancellor Rachel Reeves “to level the playing field” with a 2p cut in National Insurance (NI) matched by a 2p rise in income tax, which the think tank estimates could raise £6 billion.

The report comes amid rumours circulating in the media that landlords could be required to pay National Insurance on rental income.

There is no obvious reason why landlords should face lower tax rates than their tenants

The think tank claims, “there is no reason why landlords should face lower tax rates,” and demands a two-point increase in mortgage tax relief.

Section 24 was introduced in the Finance Act 2015 by then-Chancellor George Osborne, removing a landlord’s ability to offset mortgage interest from rental income before calculating tax liability, while allowing only a 20% basic rate deduction.

The report says: “Rental income, taxable savings income and some other minor forms of capital income – which do not attract NI – would face a 2 per cent tax rate rise. Rental income is the most significant element here, but there is no obvious reason why landlords should face lower tax rates than their tenants.

“The main expected economic impact of this particular change (which would also include the mortgage tax relief rate rising by 2 points), would be slightly lower house prices and slightly higher home ownership, with any impact on rents being small.”

As previously reported on Property118, many landlords, including Mick Roberts, one of Nottingham’s largest landlords housing benefit tenants, argue that Section 24, rather than landlords, is responsible for rising rents.

In footnote references, the think tank admits that lower post-tax profits may lead some landlords to sell, but claims, “they can primarily only ultimately sell to tenants, meaning offsetting demand and supply effects within the private rented sector. The ongoing freeze of Local Housing Allowances is a far more relevant consideration for low-income tenants than small changes in landlord taxation.”

Chancellor should do all she can to avoid loading further pain onto workers’ pay packets

The references also claim only unincorporated rental income would be affected “and this would encourage incorporation, but this would be counteracted by our proposal to raise the basic rate of dividend taxation.”

The think tank demands the Chancellor extend employer NI to Limited Liability Partnerships and raise taxes on dividends, where the basic rate is 8.75%, which they claim could raise another £2.5 billion.

Adam Corlett, principal economist at the Resolution Foundation, said: “Policy U-turns, higher borrowing costs and lower productivity growth mean that the Chancellor will need to act to avoid borrowing costs rising even further this autumn. Significant tax rises will be needed for the Chancellor to send a clear signal that the UK’s public finances are under control.

“Any tax rises are likely to be painful but given the fallout from the recent employer NI rise, the Chancellor should do all she can to avoid loading further pain onto workers’ pay packets.

“She can do this by switching our tax base away from employee National Insurance and onto Income Tax, which is paid by a far broader group in society. This should form part of wider efforts to level the playing field on tax, such as ensuring that lawyers and landlords face the same tax rates as their clients and tenants.

“These sensible reforms would raise revenue while doing the least possible harm to workers and the wider economy. And by acting decisively, the Chancellor can turn her full attention back onto securing stronger economic growth.”

Elsewhere, the think tank also calls for applying a carbon charge to long-haul flights and shipping, and reforming Vehicle Excise Duty to account for the road damage, noise and air pollution caused by heavier vehicles.

The full report can be read by clicking here.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since October 2024 - Comments: 188

    9:54 AM, 27th September 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by David100 at 24/09/2025 – 10:43
    I agree the ISA should stay. In fact the annual savings into ISA should be increased in line with inflation. Not that I have been able to save in Isa for a long time.
    Can only do so when offload some properties.

  • Member Since October 2024 - Comments: 188

    10:15 AM, 27th September 2025, About 6 months ago

    A disproportionate amount taxes go to pay the government officials, the MPs and some other civil servants, advisors etc. their expenses for housing in London and elsewhere.
    Nobody mentions this as government is tight lipped about this.
    Anyone who wants to serve in government should be working for the subjects and their welfare.
    It seems as if they are there to fill up their pockets. They are the leechpin of the UK. This is where the cuts should start, not raising taxes.
    I am surprised there are no demonstration or petitions to lower taxes and cut the government officials salaries and expenses. CEO or council heads all pay themselves a huge salary and practically do nothing, not even write their own speeches.
    These articles and persistently knocking the landlords is just not right.
    It is good if a tenant but a property, but one less person or family looking for a rental. But to replace that tenant, there are probably 2 to 3 increase of tenants. The answer is for the government to build but we don’t have unlimited spaces to build.
    Convert some councils and government buildings into housing. The government should house and look after the homeless, DSS or UC, refugees, asylum seekers etc. They need to take responsibility of ensuring maintenance and caring for these properties and these tenants.
    These work should be done with low salaries as they are working for the subjects and taking so much money from us, is just non sensical.
    To me it does not make sense that they persistently criticize LL, when they themselves cannot help anyone.
    Take money from subjects and spend it, when they cannot work for it. Easy money, just spend. More money if over spent on civil duties.

  • Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 46

    10:39 AM, 27th September 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Tiger at 27/09/2025 – 10:15
    It’s deflection, blame someone else and hopefully you don’t get scrutinised yourself. Similar to divide and conquer etc

  • Member Since November 2016 - Comments: 47

    9:46 PM, 28th September 2025, About 6 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Downsize Government at 11:55

    Stuck a bit with the fact that landlords and the retired don’t pay NI and thus it is more difficult to roll the NI contributions into tax rates.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles